Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Dub J
Some already know who the good coordinators are. The owners that don't wouldn't be able to sign them on anyway.



maybe you do but the whole reason for this is to help the ones that do not.

What would be the purpose? To burn people at the stake and/or stroke people's e-peens?

Originally posted by bamastrac
I think that each individual can keep update their own page. just have to go by the honor system. if someone is found to intentionally falsifying stats they'll be kicked from the thread and they're name's will go on the wall of shame

the honor system wouldn't work because there would be some that would simply come into the forum and cause problems just for the sake of causing problems. and in all honesty not many people on the game. would be brutally honest about their drawbacks or shortcomings on the game. most coordinators like to think they are very good at their respective craft. when in reality they are in the same boat as myself. we are no where near the upper echelon coordinators. I just don't think the honor system would work for these reasons and a few other reasons as well.

Originally posted by Dub J
What would be the purpose? To burn people at the stake and/or stroke people's e-peens?

nope the point is to simply have readily available information that all agents in GLB could access. my goal isn't to stroke anyones E-peens or have a bunch of childish drama. My goal is to post the simple honest truth concerning all agents. so to the ones thinking they would get as you say burned at the stake. then what have they done wrong to get the impression that would happen to them? on the other side of the coin is that the good owners/ coordinators would get recognized as being fair and trustworthy. basically people would get to understand certain agents are the ones thay would want to deal with. while others they may want to avoid. agenst would also get to see what owners take the time to help teach newby agents how to build and possibly coordinate. while other owners just sign dots and play the games. people could see if a agent has a history of success or failure.

basically it is a gathering of as much information about individual agents that can be gathered from our peers on the game.

Originally posted by Dub J
What would be the purpose? To burn people at the stake and/or stroke people's e-peens?

this is the interwebz, people gonna just make shit up

Originally posted by Spread-em offense
Originally posted by Dub J

What would be the purpose? To burn people at the stake and/or stroke people's e-peens?

this is the interwebz, people gonna just make shit up

that is true but hopefully if that is happening someone will bring it to light and the agents thread can be adjusted. I know this isn't a perfect idea guys seriously. but I am just trying to figure some things outthat we as agents can do to help not only new agents coming into the game. but older agents that have left and start to come back.

my idea is something kinda along the lines of the following example.

someone nominates me for discussion as a owner. a couple of people sy good things and lets on the scale of 1 to 10 they give me a 6 and 7 respectively. well then someone comes in and bad mouths me and says I suck as a owner. well as long as that agent can show that what they are saying is the truth and can prove it. then the bad rating will stand. the key is that for people to actually give someone a bad rating they need to post what the bad rating comes from and show the proof. this should actually limit the amount of BS posts that we see in the forum.

Originally posted by Landry Skins
People can pm you (or another mod) to post a user in the forum. People can then post their comments on them and the mod locks the thread after a week and summarizes the comments.

Or just have people rate and average.

Thats pretty much how it has run in the past for the most part.


Originally posted by hatchman
this is sort of where I am at for the most part right now. I am trying to figure a rating system though something like 1-100 or 1-10 and then after the agent has been in discussions for a week or maybe even 2 weeks. lock the thread and add all the socres together and then simply divide the score by the number of ratings. this would give everyone a overall score that would reflect their success or failures.

Might work but the old way seemed to be more post based or response and go from there.I dont think bringing in a new forum you should dump the old post totally as those owners do come and go and at least you would have something to draw on if they came back saying I was this and that but most may not rememeber me.

Originally posted by MV Thunder
Originally posted by Landry Skins

People can pm you (or another mod) to post a user in the forum. People can then post their comments on them and the mod locks the thread after a week and summarizes the comments.

Or just have people rate and average.

Thats pretty much how it has run in the past for the most part.


Originally posted by hatchman

this is sort of where I am at for the most part right now. I am trying to figure a rating system though something like 1-100 or 1-10 and then after the agent has been in discussions for a week or maybe even 2 weeks. lock the thread and add all the socres together and then simply divide the score by the number of ratings. this would give everyone a overall score that would reflect their success or failures.

Might work but the old way seemed to be more post based or response and go from there.I dont think bringing in a new forum you should dump the old post totally as those owners do come and go and at least you would have something to draw on if they came back saying I was this and that but most may not rememeber me.

the only bad thing about the other forum is it is StevenJ's I really have no way of pulling the info from his forum because he used spread sheets. so pulling any of the real ratings is nearly impossible. I could copy and paste the actual threads but without the ratings they are in reality rather useless.

It could be used for a reference library then? or something near that

Originally posted by Dub J
What would be the purpose? To burn people at the stake and/or stroke people's e-peens?

idk i wouldn't mind getting my e-peens stroked lol.

besides i would think its like a personal achievement page or brag page.

Originally posted by hatchman
the honor system wouldn't work because there would be some that would simply come into the forum and cause problems just for the sake of causing problems. and in all honesty not many people on the game. would be brutally honest about their drawbacks or shortcomings on the game. most coordinators like to think they are very good at their respective craft. when in reality they are in the same boat as myself. we are no where near the upper echelon coordinators. I just don't think the honor system would work for these reasons and a few other reasons as well.

the only think they would be able to jack up is their own page. if someone is causing too much trouble then kick em.

Originally posted by bamastrac
the only think they would be able to jack up is their own page. if someone is causing too much trouble then kick em.

How many people would actually keep up with their own pages though? There isn't a ton of activity the way it is now. So if we went with the system you are suggesting here I just don't see the info making it to the page like it would in other ways.

hey if someone isn't interested in putting in the little bit of effort it take to maintain their own page then it doesn't really matter. GLB isn't going to do it for us.

I could use an e-peen strokin'

lord knows that is only peen strokin I be gettin these days

Originally posted by bamastrac
i think it would be pretty cool to see. of course rating should be based off of level of competition and wins is the easiest way that i could think of.



I think mostly the things really needed is stuff like, team name, seasons owned. Stuff so people, especially new guys to the game, would know they weren't making a mistake. Other stuff could be included I guess, general stuff like has working knowledge of Offense or D.