Originally posted by jampysos
low level
your knowledge of GLB stops right there, so should your advice
low level
your knowledge of GLB stops right there, so should your advice
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Do dual threat qbs work at higher levels?
Originally posted by Bane
your knowledge of GLB stops right there, so should your advice
Does it?
lolu.
your knowledge of GLB stops right there, so should your advice
Does it?
lolu.
Originally posted by Hagalaz
I've achieved almost everything I set out for. What more success could I have?
And do you disagree that "Most OCs only want pure passes or nearly pure rushers" as I stated?
Also, why do I need to know what every single OC in the game is doing?
And why do I need to measure the "amount of time and work OCs are putting into the game" ?
I made no such statements concerning ALL OCs and I made no such statements concerning the effort they take. A person can have 100% effort rolling a rock downhill instead of up. The ball is still heading the opposite direction even though the effort is the maximum possible.
As usual, expecting people to be logical and making sense here in GLB is like expecting the atlantic ocean to be dry... *sigh*
read your first post dipstick and it answers all of your stupid questions in the post I quoted. people like you just come on here and run your yapper and have no idea where you crapped last.
I've achieved almost everything I set out for. What more success could I have?
And do you disagree that "Most OCs only want pure passes or nearly pure rushers" as I stated?
Also, why do I need to know what every single OC in the game is doing?
And why do I need to measure the "amount of time and work OCs are putting into the game" ?
I made no such statements concerning ALL OCs and I made no such statements concerning the effort they take. A person can have 100% effort rolling a rock downhill instead of up. The ball is still heading the opposite direction even though the effort is the maximum possible.
As usual, expecting people to be logical and making sense here in GLB is like expecting the atlantic ocean to be dry... *sigh*
read your first post dipstick and it answers all of your stupid questions in the post I quoted. people like you just come on here and run your yapper and have no idea where you crapped last.
cernets always destroyed people and were hell to gameplan against so yes they can be incredible but it does take a very active/creative OC to really get teams on their heels and maximize the builds effectiveness
LT56
offline
offline
Originally posted by husker4life
cernets always destroyed people and were hell to gameplan against so yes they can be incredible but it does take a very active/creative OC to really get teams on their heels and maximize the builds effectiveness
this
cernets always destroyed people and were hell to gameplan against so yes they can be incredible but it does take a very active/creative OC to really get teams on their heels and maximize the builds effectiveness
this
VegasABD
offline
offline
Originally posted by hatchman
read your first post dipstick and it answers all of your stupid questions in the post I quoted. people like you just come on here and run your yapper and have no idea where you crapped last.
Hatch is the real....Keep playing your stupid casual, and avoiding the ABD. Hatch, is the biggest douche on GLB.
read your first post dipstick and it answers all of your stupid questions in the post I quoted. people like you just come on here and run your yapper and have no idea where you crapped last.
Hatch is the real
....Keep playing your stupid casual, and avoiding the ABD. Hatch, is the biggest douche on GLB.5STAR
offline
offline
110 throwing is not enough to pass and rush with 130 speed
160 speed is not enough to rush with 80 throwing
sorry doesnt work as mainstream...I tried
160 speed is not enough to rush with 80 throwing
sorry doesnt work as mainstream...I tried
mangelito
offline
offline
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2324899&playoffs=0
During 5 WL seasons (last 2 in decline)
2600+ yards and 18 TDs passing
3600+ yards and 33 TDs rushing (4.2 YPC)
More of a rusher, but still a decent passer. It works, with the right OC.
During 5 WL seasons (last 2 in decline)
2600+ yards and 18 TDs passing
3600+ yards and 33 TDs rushing (4.2 YPC)
More of a rusher, but still a decent passer. It works, with the right OC.
Hagalaz
offline
offline
Originally posted by hatchman
read your first post dipstick and it answers all of your stupid questions in the post I quoted. people like you just come on here and run your yapper and have no idea where you crapped last.
No. Also, stop being illogical and irrational for once and act like a constructive adult in order to get a conversation going that actually helps people instead of just dissing on someone, will you?
I swear, you people have no notion of what's the right thing... I am starting to think I am lucky not to have to deal with people like you professionally, it would be the most frustrating thing ever.
Nonetheless:
Originally posted by mangelito
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2324899&playoffs=0
During 5 WL seasons (last 2 in decline)
2600+ yards and 18 TDs passing
3600+ yards and 33 TDs rushing (4.2 YPC)
More of a rusher, but still a decent passer. It works, with the right OC.
This is 100% on the spot. They can work, but the biggest challenge isn't building your player, but instead finding an OC that would use the player as he should.
read your first post dipstick and it answers all of your stupid questions in the post I quoted. people like you just come on here and run your yapper and have no idea where you crapped last.
No. Also, stop being illogical and irrational for once and act like a constructive adult in order to get a conversation going that actually helps people instead of just dissing on someone, will you?
I swear, you people have no notion of what's the right thing... I am starting to think I am lucky not to have to deal with people like you professionally, it would be the most frustrating thing ever.
Nonetheless:
Originally posted by mangelito
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2324899&playoffs=0
During 5 WL seasons (last 2 in decline)
2600+ yards and 18 TDs passing
3600+ yards and 33 TDs rushing (4.2 YPC)
More of a rusher, but still a decent passer. It works, with the right OC.
This is 100% on the spot. They can work, but the biggest challenge isn't building your player, but instead finding an OC that would use the player as he should.
Originally posted by VegasABD
Originally posted by hatchman
read your first post dipstick and it answers all of your stupid questions in the post I quoted. people like you just come on here and run your yapper and have no idea where you crapped last.
Hatch is the real....Keep playing your stupid casual, and avoiding the ABD. Hatch, is the biggest douche on GLB.
Not going to waste time arguing with you. but you are a little off as usual last I checked I have a regular AI team that is in the Pros. last time I checked as a owner I have won more trophies as a owner than you have. at higher leagues I might add. and don't even try to count the crap where Hero listed you as a Co-Owner. the ABD never did anything with you as a owner. Hero took over the job and has proved that a good agent running a team will have success. where you try to hang your hat on you being in the Pro's 20 some seasons. but what you do not tell people when you try to brag is that you owned the team when you could buy the team in Pro and keep it there with little to no work. hell your dumbass only made the playoffs I think once as a owner in APL. You were the laughing stock of that league and was never relevant to anything but trying to argue and make retarded bets in the forum. and the hilarious thing is how you would lose a bet then try to either try to backpedal out of it. or try to make some other retarded bet to try to cover the one you lost.
so now Vegas you can do your usual crybaby act. you will come in here and pop off how ABD beat my team. or you will start bringing up crap from when you were part of the DWO or you will try to make some stupid bet. so I will stop you and say don't waste your time. I am done with this childish crap with you. Best of Luck to Hero's team I wish Hero all the best.
Originally posted by hatchman
read your first post dipstick and it answers all of your stupid questions in the post I quoted. people like you just come on here and run your yapper and have no idea where you crapped last.
Hatch is the real
....Keep playing your stupid casual, and avoiding the ABD. Hatch, is the biggest douche on GLB.Not going to waste time arguing with you. but you are a little off as usual last I checked I have a regular AI team that is in the Pros. last time I checked as a owner I have won more trophies as a owner than you have. at higher leagues I might add. and don't even try to count the crap where Hero listed you as a Co-Owner. the ABD never did anything with you as a owner. Hero took over the job and has proved that a good agent running a team will have success. where you try to hang your hat on you being in the Pro's 20 some seasons. but what you do not tell people when you try to brag is that you owned the team when you could buy the team in Pro and keep it there with little to no work. hell your dumbass only made the playoffs I think once as a owner in APL. You were the laughing stock of that league and was never relevant to anything but trying to argue and make retarded bets in the forum. and the hilarious thing is how you would lose a bet then try to either try to backpedal out of it. or try to make some other retarded bet to try to cover the one you lost.
so now Vegas you can do your usual crybaby act. you will come in here and pop off how ABD beat my team. or you will start bringing up crap from when you were part of the DWO or you will try to make some stupid bet. so I will stop you and say don't waste your time. I am done with this childish crap with you. Best of Luck to Hero's team I wish Hero all the best.
Originally posted by Hagalaz
Originally posted by hatchman
read your first post dipstick and it answers all of your stupid questions in the post I quoted. people like you just come on here and run your yapper and have no idea where you crapped last.
No. Also, stop being illogical and irrational for once and act like a constructive adult in order to get a conversation going that actually helps people instead of just dissing on someone, will you?
I swear, you people have no notion of what's the right thing... I am starting to think I am lucky not to have to deal with people like you professionally, it would be the most frustrating thing ever.
Nonetheless:
Originally posted by mangelito
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2324899&playoffs=0
During 5 WL seasons (last 2 in decline)
2600+ yards and 18 TDs passing
3600+ yards and 33 TDs rushing (4.2 YPC)
More of a rusher, but still a decent passer. It works, with the right OC.
This is 100% on the spot. They can work, but the biggest challenge isn't building your player, but instead finding an OC that would use the player as he should.
You are funny to say the least. your first post said no OC tries so no OC has success.
but then you agree with Mangelito. maybe I am missing something but your statements just don't make alot of sense. either you can agree that a dual threat can be decent with the right OC doing the job. or you can take your stance that no OC tries so no OC has success. so which statement is the one you are saying I need to be more logical on?
Originally posted by hatchman
read your first post dipstick and it answers all of your stupid questions in the post I quoted. people like you just come on here and run your yapper and have no idea where you crapped last.
No. Also, stop being illogical and irrational for once and act like a constructive adult in order to get a conversation going that actually helps people instead of just dissing on someone, will you?
I swear, you people have no notion of what's the right thing... I am starting to think I am lucky not to have to deal with people like you professionally, it would be the most frustrating thing ever.
Nonetheless:
Originally posted by mangelito
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2324899&playoffs=0
During 5 WL seasons (last 2 in decline)
2600+ yards and 18 TDs passing
3600+ yards and 33 TDs rushing (4.2 YPC)
More of a rusher, but still a decent passer. It works, with the right OC.
This is 100% on the spot. They can work, but the biggest challenge isn't building your player, but instead finding an OC that would use the player as he should.
You are funny to say the least. your first post said no OC tries so no OC has success.
but then you agree with Mangelito. maybe I am missing something but your statements just don't make alot of sense. either you can agree that a dual threat can be decent with the right OC doing the job. or you can take your stance that no OC tries so no OC has success. so which statement is the one you are saying I need to be more logical on?
Hagalaz
offline
offline
Did you maaaaybe read MY ENTIRE POST instead of ONE PHRASE?
Cause ... Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaybe it EXPLAINS things... Maaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyybeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...
*sigh*
Intro: "If no OC tries, no OC succeeds". <- Something catchy to bait people into reading, shock and awe works well.
Overview: "Most OCs are not interested in a dual threat QB." <- Here, facts are more important, but not a lot of detail should be introduced.
Further explanation and evolution: "These OCs would rather have a pure passer than a dual threat." <- Here we denote an issue concerning the mentality of the majority of OCs in this game, which are, for the most part, not interested in dual threats. Yes, there are pearls who are interested in them, and those do well, but there are far more people interested in building a dual threat than OCs interested in having them, which generates a chasm. Normally one would leave a conclusion, but in a forum, this is a bit overkill.
So yes, I do need you to be logical. Not MORE logical, just logical, as you lacked any. Taking one phrase out of context, specially the intro phrase in a post will not get you a full understanding of what the post is about! Duh!
Cause ... Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaybe it EXPLAINS things... Maaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyybeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...
*sigh*
Intro: "If no OC tries, no OC succeeds". <- Something catchy to bait people into reading, shock and awe works well.
Overview: "Most OCs are not interested in a dual threat QB." <- Here, facts are more important, but not a lot of detail should be introduced.
Further explanation and evolution: "These OCs would rather have a pure passer than a dual threat." <- Here we denote an issue concerning the mentality of the majority of OCs in this game, which are, for the most part, not interested in dual threats. Yes, there are pearls who are interested in them, and those do well, but there are far more people interested in building a dual threat than OCs interested in having them, which generates a chasm. Normally one would leave a conclusion, but in a forum, this is a bit overkill.
So yes, I do need you to be logical. Not MORE logical, just logical, as you lacked any. Taking one phrase out of context, specially the intro phrase in a post will not get you a full understanding of what the post is about! Duh!
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by Hagalaz
Since no OC tries, no OC really succeeds.
Most OCs only want pure passes or nearly pure rushers, they never want real dual threats.
Since no OC tries, no OC really succeeds.
Most OCs only want pure passes or nearly pure rushers, they never want real dual threats.
MissingNola
offline
offline
Don't go there with Hagz. He say's he hates these arguments, but I think he actually lives for them. It's like wrestling with a pig; you both get dirty and the pig likes it.
It's not worth it. All he will do is ignore statements he's already made, accuse you of being illogical while not recognizing his own illogical fallacies, and he'll completely misinterpret anything you say or even put words in your mouth to argue against. Then, he'll accuse you of not being nearly as intelligent or logical as he is. It's like pulling a string on a top; he'll just spin in one place for hours while the rest of us try to move on to something more interesting.
It's not worth it. All he will do is ignore statements he's already made, accuse you of being illogical while not recognizing his own illogical fallacies, and he'll completely misinterpret anything you say or even put words in your mouth to argue against. Then, he'll accuse you of not being nearly as intelligent or logical as he is. It's like pulling a string on a top; he'll just spin in one place for hours while the rest of us try to move on to something more interesting.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
