And if this Diamond Valley team isn't very good, the CPU team scales based on their opponent, so wouldn't the CPU team also not be very good?
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > CPU teams winning in the playoffs
i watched like 5 plays, and they were targeting blocking TE's and passing to blocking FB's so clearly they did not put forth a very good effort. /end thread
vladykins
offline
offline
Originally posted by reddogrw
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2384595
means another home game for the team I CFO
Whooooooooa holdonaminute!
There is a team you don't CFO for?
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2384595
means another home game for the team I CFO
Whooooooooa holdonaminute!
There is a team you don't CFO for?
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by gbororats
i watched like 5 plays, and they were targeting blocking TE's and passing to blocking FB's so clearly they did not put forth a very good effort. /end thread
i watched like 5 plays, and they were targeting blocking TE's and passing to blocking FB's so clearly they did not put forth a very good effort. /end thread
hokegoalie
offline
offline
Yo dawg, it's still pretty fucking retarded to go from winning a game in a 34-0 shutout, to losing by 27.
Edited by hokegoalie on Jul 2, 2013 15:57:08
i dont know anyone who has ever gameplanned for a cpu team. even i beat cpu teams without trying.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
i dont know anyone who has ever gameplanned for a cpu team. even i beat cpu teams without trying.
I have no idea how you'd even do it against a genuine CPU team as opposed to a CPU roster run by an active agent.
i dont know anyone who has ever gameplanned for a cpu team. even i beat cpu teams without trying.
I have no idea how you'd even do it against a genuine CPU team as opposed to a CPU roster run by an active agent.
Originally posted by jdbolick
I have no idea how you'd even do it against a genuine CPU team as opposed to a CPU roster run by an active agent.
exactly, they are all RNG
I have no idea how you'd even do it against a genuine CPU team as opposed to a CPU roster run by an active agent.
exactly, they are all RNG
Dub J
offline
offline
Beating a CPU owned by a human is much easier than beating a CPU owned team. That penalty is a motherfucker.
Originally posted by jdbolick
I have no idea how you'd even do it against a genuine CPU team as opposed to a CPU roster run by an active agent.
i really have no idea. some ppl say they spend 5 minutes doing it. i just use the same AI as the previous game. i couldnt care less if i won by 500 or if i win 100-0. either way, it is never close. i seriously dont understand how anyone with a decent roster can lose or come close to losing to a CPU team.
I have no idea how you'd even do it against a genuine CPU team as opposed to a CPU roster run by an active agent.
i really have no idea. some ppl say they spend 5 minutes doing it. i just use the same AI as the previous game. i couldnt care less if i won by 500 or if i win 100-0. either way, it is never close. i seriously dont understand how anyone with a decent roster can lose or come close to losing to a CPU team.
you can start by maybe passing to receiving dots rather than blocking dots, i dont know, just a hunch... im pretty sure i could lose to a CPU team if i tried hard enough
Dub J
offline
offline
Look, GoBots. The guy should NEVER lose to a CPU no matter what. EVER. NEVER FUKEN EVER.
Originally posted by gbororats
you can start by maybe passing to receiving dots rather than blocking dots, i dont know, just a hunch... im pretty sure i could lose to a CPU team if i tried hard enough
im sure i could pass to my BTEs and BFBs and still win. maybe not by a lot but im sure we'd still win.
you can start by maybe passing to receiving dots rather than blocking dots, i dont know, just a hunch... im pretty sure i could lose to a CPU team if i tried hard enough
im sure i could pass to my BTEs and BFBs and still win. maybe not by a lot but im sure we'd still win.
Dub J
offline
offline
If my receiving TE was a hooker and my QB a tranny I'm sure they would get a lot of strange looks.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by gbororats
you can start by maybe passing to receiving dots rather than blocking dots, i dont know, just a hunch... im pretty sure i could lose to a CPU team if i tried hard enough
I posted when you made this comment before precisely because they didn't do either of those things. They passed three times to a combo FB and once to a combo TE. The FB had caught 31 passes during the regular season whereas the TE had admittedly only caught 7, but both were functional parts of the passing game outside of this result. I hope you realize that there is a significant difference between a combo FB/TE and a blocking FB/TE.
you can start by maybe passing to receiving dots rather than blocking dots, i dont know, just a hunch... im pretty sure i could lose to a CPU team if i tried hard enough
I posted
when you made this comment before precisely because they didn't do either of those things. They passed three times to a combo FB and once to a combo TE. The FB had caught 31 passes during the regular season whereas the TE had admittedly only caught 7, but both were functional parts of the passing game outside of this result. I hope you realize that there is a significant difference between a combo FB/TE and a blocking FB/TE.You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
