Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Dub J
I PM'd Catch about it, tbh.



But I like liars. So I am giving him the benefit of the doubt.

No, I mean I PM'd him yesterday. Obviously should have brought it to his attention sooner via PM.

Originally posted by Dub J
No, I mean I PM'd him yesterday. Obviously should have brought it to his attention sooner via PM.



which I am sure he has gotten well over 50 pms about fixing pee wee. He opens them and doesn't read them and then goes into the forum and bans 15 people and then signs off

Originally posted by AD2K
which I am sure he has gotten well over 50 pms about fixing pee wee. He opens them and doesn't read them and then goes into the forum and bans 15 people and then signs off

15? Sounds like you estimate the unique customer base a bit high.

Originally posted by Catch22
I haven't looked at Pee Wee in a while (and tbh, no one has ever sent me a pm asking me to - if they had I might have done so more sooner) but just glancing through the leagues, it's obvious there is little need for all the Pee Wee leagues we currently have.

What if we just went with a tiered system that worked something like the regular leagues do.

Pee Wee Gold - the 32 best, bottom 8 from each conference (16 total) demote each season to keep things fresh and challenging and to give plenty of opportunity for new teams. Demoting teams go into a Pee Wee Silver #1 or #2 league.

Pee Wee Silver #1/2 - all teams that make second round of playoffs (16 total) promote to Pee Wee Gold. Bottom 4 teams from each conference (8 total) demote to Pee Wee Copper #1 or #2.

Pee Wee Copper #1/2 - all teams that make the conference championship game promote to Pee Wee Silver #1 or #2 (8 total).

That makes for a total of 5 leagues which at 32 teams per league = 160 teams. Currently I think there are approximately 115 non-CPU teams in Pee Wee so this would leave more than enough room for new teams if needed.


Open for discussion but that's a preliminary idea to work with.

This is exactly what peewee needs. Pretty much what Gerr and myself have suggested. It will work. Problem is jury fielding 32 human teams.

Originally posted by Dub J
Not sure how to work that out since it would be odd for the Silvers. If 8 promoted that would mean the 4 conference champions. Not sure about how to work the at-large. Just don't like such a high turnover with only two leagues feeding Gold.

Maybe either use playoff tiebreakers or margin of loss for the conference runner-ups to decide who gets the 4 at-large promotions.





Agreed.

-1

better to just remove peewee leagues completely.

lulz

I would ditch copper completely.
1 Gold and 2 Silvers
Bottom 8 of each conference in Gold demotes (16 teams)
Top 4 in each Silver conference Promotes (16 teams)

Less is more. Less saturation may make for better competition and with all non playoff teams dropping it will make all 3 leagues competitive for teams who want that.

Originally posted by LordEvil
I would ditch copper completely.
1 Gold and 2 Silvers
Bottom 8 of each conference in Gold demotes (16 teams)
Top 4 in each Silver conference Promotes (16 teams)

Less is more. Less saturation may make for better competition and with all non playoff teams dropping it will make all 3 leagues competitive for teams who want that.

Which owners do you recommend stripping of their teams?

Currently 122 human owned PW teams.

3 leagues = 96 teams


You would have to take away a team from 26 users.

Originally posted by Dub J
Currently 122 human owned PW teams.

3 leagues = 96 teams


You would have to take away a team from 26 users.



The ones fielding garbage teams (1-4 players)

FYI after doing the rankings there are 48 teams in silver with 16 or more players on the team and thats it.

......................Players on team
1 …….. 55 …….. Weird Al Yankovic's
2 …….. 55 …….. Randomly Generated
3 …….. 55 …….. Mantis Shrimps
4 …….. 55 …….. Sydney Sharks
5 …….. 55 …….. Wood Village Whistle Pigs
6 …….. 55 …….. New Orleans Pee Wees
7 …….. 55 …….. Whodey's Experiment
8 …….. 55 …….. OffTopica Salvation
9 …….. 55 …….. Steel City Kops
10 …….. 55 …….. LaPorte Bulldogs
11 …….. 55 …….. El Retrι State Jesters
12 …….. 55 …….. Les Chats Noirs
13 …….. 55 …….. Mission Beach Monarchs
14 …….. 55 …….. The Citadel Bulldogs
15 …….. 55 …….. Moe's Tavern
16 …….. 55 …….. St-Truiden Youth Patriots
17 …….. 55 …….. OffTopica Redemption
18 …….. 55 …….. Corleone Hitmen
19 …….. 55 …….. OffTopica Believers
20 …….. 55 …….. Sackville Blitz
21 …….. 55 …….. Stone Mountain Redneck Militia
22 …….. 54 …….. Cincinnati RedruM
23 …….. 54 …….. Indiana Thunderstorm
24 …….. 54 …….. Kill Devil Hill Flyers
25 …….. 54 …….. Dutch Harbor Fisherman
26 …….. 52 …….. Oklahoma Legends
27 …….. 52 …….. Mongolian Horde
28 …….. 51 …….. Domestically Imported Anarchy
29 …….. 50 …….. UWF World Wrestling Champions
30 …….. 50 …….. Boston Teabaggers
31 …….. 49 …….. Texas Talons
32 …….. 49 …….. DIRTY INC.
33 …….. 48 …….. We TouchDown There
34 …….. 48 …….. Cincinnati Stingers
35 …….. 47 …….. Boston Irish
36 …….. 43 …….. Boston Minutemen
37 …….. 43 …….. Mad Dots
38 …….. 43 …….. Oakland Spiked Menace
39 …….. 37 …….. West Baltimore Giants
40 …….. 31 …….. Black Veil Players
41 …….. 16 …….. Team Philly 2
42 …….. 16 …….. Texas Fruit Loops
43 …….. 16 …….. Springfield Elementary
44 …….. 15 …….. San Francisco Toffees
45 …….. 13 …….. Philadelphia All-Madden Team
46 …….. 9 …….. SH Ravens
47 …….. 4 …….. Pee Wee Redskins
48 …….. 4 …….. Rocky Horror
49 …….. 1 …….. Lincoln City Seals
50 …….. 1 …….. SHAOLIN SOLDIERS

Originally posted by LordEvil
The ones fielding garbage teams (1-4 players)

FYI after doing the rankings there are 48 teams in silver with 16 or more players on the team and thats it.

Bort is not going to take away teams people spent flex to buy. NGTH


There are at least half a dozen teams in Gold with CPU rosters as well. My point is, how do you in a fair manner choose who loses their team and who doesn't?