Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Uncle Si
Apparently so was the DPC and they patched it and now any offensive weapon/play..so theres really no point in
caring about how overpowered something may be.

how would bort fix this if he put it in the game? mid career be like "oh im switching some minors and majors, so.... sorry about your ruined build that youve been working on for a few months."

by this i mean the hybrid qb arch

Originally posted by Uncle Si
Scrambler:
Major Attributes: Agility, Throwing, Vision
Minor Attributes: Confidence, Speed, Strength, Carrying
Favored Special Abilities: On the Run, Dump Pass
Penalized Special Abilities: Pump Fake, Tight Spiral

So basically a QB that you want to rush 10+ times and be able to break a big run wont be able to also throw the ball 20+ times.
All I did was add Speed into the major attributes.

umm they aren't going to throw another major skill into .67 ALG's. DURR

So it would be .5 ALG's and you are probably worse off with everything except speed. Which is really not a highly important skill at RQB.

There isn't going to be another arch added to the game. The arch's are set. That being said it is possible to build a good duel QB with the right build plan.

The game could really use some fresh plays

^

Originally posted by bhall43
There isn't going to be another arch added to the game. The arch's are set. That being said it is possible to build a good duel QB with the right build plan.

Originally posted by bhall43
umm they aren't going to throw another major skill into .67 ALG's. DURR

So it would be .5 ALG's and you are probably worse off with everything except speed. Which is really not a highly important skill at RQB.

And Hey I understand what youre saying. I was just wondering if there would be a combo build to the position like the others.

Originally posted by Uncle Si
And Hey I understand what youre saying. I was just wondering if there would be a combo build to the position like the others.



That is basically what the scrambler arch is meant for. Not the straight RQB's like you see right now. And like I said...the build can be done...it is just a matter of doing it efficiently enough. Which I believe CerNeT has done a couple times now.

Originally posted by bhall43
Yes
No
No
No

Trips Right is coming? srs?

You have to remember that when the archetypes were being created one of the main considerations was balance. If you create a 'super archetype' with all the majors that the typical user would want, then that's likely going to be an overpowered archetype. We'd all pick that one archetype. There has to be give and take.

The best example is the blitzer LB archetype that was brought up above. Obviously jumping isn't exactly in the top 4 for valuable attributes for that labeled role.

Originally posted by lardaddy
Trips Right is coming? srs?

Nothing is set in stone. But there are a number of formations in the works. But right now the focus is defensively.

Originally posted by Uncle Si
Hey, Im like Aretha Franklin, I dont get no R-S-P-E-C-T around here!

Will there ever be a Trips Right? Or what?
Will there ever be play action/motion? Its been tested.
Will there ever be custom movement for Dline again? GoodNESS
Will there ever be a QB archetype named COMBO/HYBRID? itd be smart

Hey, someone has to crack the whip.

Trips Right would mess up Strong/Weak logic. In every other formation, strong refers to right. Swapping it to left would possibly mess up coding and would lead to potential for confusion.

Play action could be a cool addition. I'd imagine it would be either overpowered or underpowered and tough to balance. Motion could provide some benefits if zones were better but as is really don't offer anything.

Nope. Don't expect free movement on the D Line anytime soon.

Nope. Changing archetyps is NGTH.

Originally posted by Uncle Si

Will there ever be a QB archetype named COMBO/HYBRID? itd be smart

scrambler is already that

Originally posted by bhall43
Yes
No
No
No

yes

u srs?

Originally posted by AirMcMVP
Trips Right would mess up Strong/Weak logic. In every other formation, strong refers to right. Swapping it to left would possibly mess up coding and would lead to potential for confusion.


how hard is it to change the wording so that strong/weak becomes right/left?