I think it would be easier to defend the crack block than what is used now tbh.
Forum > Suggestions > Using WR to block LB w/ speed on sweep plays and screens
Originally posted by bhall43
I think it would be easier to defend the crack block than what is used now tbh.
After requiring DCs to change a lot of their plays, yeah. I'm kinda anti-screen as I think it moves us towards cheesing. I get that you could create (in real life) an entire offense with a heavy-dose of screens (see Kyle Orton's time at Purdue) but the reality is that in a football game we don't really want to see that. It's just leads to irritation.
I think it would be easier to defend the crack block than what is used now tbh.
After requiring DCs to change a lot of their plays, yeah. I'm kinda anti-screen as I think it moves us towards cheesing. I get that you could create (in real life) an entire offense with a heavy-dose of screens (see Kyle Orton's time at Purdue) but the reality is that in a football game we don't really want to see that. It's just leads to irritation.
bhall43
offline
offline
Would be a small change to the coverage of WR1 and the HB. That being said complicated blocking schemes and GLB don't mix.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
