Warrior General Games

+1... i wouldn't mind the false starts if they weren't so one sided... but there are at least 10 false starts by the offense for every 1 encroachment by the defense.

either scale them so they don't hit lower levels so much or balance them so the O and D are equally penalized

Originally posted by darncat
-1 penalties are part of the game

plus, yr making confidence less important with this decision so IMO its NGH


also, we just finished rookie league, and i don't think there were that much penalties at all-
maybe 2 or 3 a game, tops? its just i have yet to even see the slightest hint of an issue here, ever.

That would be a concise analysis, but considering there are only 2 penalties in "this" game, this being one of them....

it is not stupid. I say it should increase/decrease with your chemistry. So if you have like 40 overall chemistry you will have like an average of 13 penalties or so in the game like dallas cowboys and some of them crucial maybe like a pass interference on 3rd and 7. Automatic first down. or if you have a perfect chemistry, you commit maybe 1 or 2 during the game. i think thats more fair way to deal with chemistry issue, taking from a players ability to play eg 5% decrease in the players ability due to overall team chemistry cheats the players!! Team chemistry shouldnt affect players playing, i think it should affect team chemistry. I mean whats the new QB coming in makes the WR drop balls due to chemistry?? I think thats the stupid idea

I do agree with more varieties of penalties in the game though

Originally posted by Dub J
+1

It is really stupid to have just two penalties in this game. Either have all of them and have a balance between O and D penalties or get rid of them altogether.



Best argument in this thread. Stick to the basics and less sob story telling.

Either remove penalties all together or add them all in..

Yeah, I mean Bort even changed an SA because he abandoned penalties. It's obvious he intended to add all the penalties and never followed through. I just can't stand something done half-assed.

Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
But Bort sitting there with a little button telling Catch "Watch this! hahaha!" is really not doing it for me.
that would be amazing.

i'm almost considering learning computer programming so that i could do that to people, and have some kind of chat or better yet voice response recorded and uploaded to a website.

www.nerdrage.com

+1 to this thread,

and +1 to making freaking encroachments on par with the numerous false starts

Originally posted by Dub J
Yeah, I mean Bort even changed an SA because he abandoned penalties. It's obvious he intended to add all the penalties and never followed through. I just can't stand something done half-assed.



This really sums it up more than any nerdrage I can spew.

False starts seem so out of place and rather cheesy. Just not thought through very well or followed up upon. They did a great job and put a lot of work in to make the sim what it is. The penalty part kind of taints the polished product.

Since the tourney starts day 3 I think entry level builds should at least have a chance to tame the false starts before then. As it is there is little you can do.

Honestly I can not even remember the last time I saw an encroachment. If they are just going to randomly add encroachments without thinking them through as well I really do not want to see them increase.

Originally posted by TJ Spikes

that would be amazing.

i'm almost considering learning computer programming so that i could do that to people, and have some kind of chat or better yet voice response recorded and uploaded to a website.

www.nerdrage.com






It wouldn't take a genius to figure out my four letter response. I imagine it would be pretty funny to an outsider watching me cuss and flail.

is there a peewee nerf for confidence and agility or sumptin?
i only ever hear peewee owners complaining about this...

bort says its purely based on vision but from my vision players some seasons back i have to say that is a total false argument.

i mean like 90 vision and they were false starting twice as much as other teams....no way its purely vision based.

i thought confidence plays a big part too?

idk, i rarely have ever seen more than 2 or 3 of them a game, even at rookie level...