Warrior General Games

Originally posted by whodey08
No one knows for sure what the OOP is for any position and Bort wants it to remain secret. The assumption is 5% penalty for related positions and 10% or more for unrelated positions.

I'm pretty sure it's more than 5%.

DE at ROLB looks like they get a sudden case of the downs.

I thought that it depended mainly on the Vision of the Player as to how bad the Penalty was. If I'm a FS with 90 Vision, I should be able to Play Nickel without looking stupid,lol.

Originally posted by aaasahi
I never heard OOP between DE/OLB is low..............

Bort said that along time ago. Look in the NFL at how many DE's take there finger's out of the dirt and get stood up at OLB with great success. I.E. D. Ware, Dwight Freeney, Mathias Kiwanuka, Anthony Spencer, Robert Mathias, to name a few.

Originally posted by sehorn31
I thought that it depended mainly on the Vision of the Player as to how bad the Penalty was.

Nope

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
Nope

It should,lol. Vision and how far the switch is. Like if I Play a SS in a Rover Role as a Mike LB in Spread Defense I could see that being more than him Playing FS. Should also depend on the Arch Type I think.

Originally posted by sehorn31
It should,lol. Vision and how far the switch is. Like if I Play a SS in a Rover Role as a Mike LB in Spread Defense I could see that being more than him Playing FS. Should also depend on the Arch Type I think.

Its set up like it is to make sure there is balance between the positions being made and to keep the flex rolling in to GLB. If there was not a major OOP than you would get fast ass 200 flex FB's playing WR, 100 flex Centers playing blocking TE, 200 flex FB's playing HB, and so on and so on. They need people building those 300 flex players and they want to keep things balanced so accept it and move on

this is NGTH

sorry I didn't lock this down sooner... but position penalties are staying as they are etc... mainly because of all of the exploits mentioned above