Originally posted by bhall43
owner is meaningless in the entire situation.
Reading comprehension = 0?
Maybe you missed fogie's post.
owner is meaningless in the entire situation.
Reading comprehension = 0?
Maybe you missed fogie's post.
Forum > Suggestions > Allow an Option for Player's Tactics like Attribute Sharing
Diamond Spade
offline
offline
Originally posted by BagO'Chips
I'm surprised no one brought this up...the Owner is paying for the team. They are paying for most scrimmages, paying for additional seasons and the initial cost, giving your player a place to play and learn more about the game, giving you XP, and keeping you up to date on training. The owner is pretty much letting you experience GLB imo. The least you can do is open up your builds and tactics, and follow and build guide. Doing this will make you a better player and that's what most of us strive for, greatness. Just my opinion here.
i think it comes down to money. Who spends more the owner or the agent?
even though what u say is true. the amount of money needed to manage a team doesnt compare to the amount of money needed to maintain a player. which is probably y this will not be implemented.
I'm surprised no one brought this up...the Owner is paying for the team. They are paying for most scrimmages, paying for additional seasons and the initial cost, giving your player a place to play and learn more about the game, giving you XP, and keeping you up to date on training. The owner is pretty much letting you experience GLB imo. The least you can do is open up your builds and tactics, and follow and build guide. Doing this will make you a better player and that's what most of us strive for, greatness. Just my opinion here.
i think it comes down to money. Who spends more the owner or the agent?
even though what u say is true. the amount of money needed to manage a team doesnt compare to the amount of money needed to maintain a player. which is probably y this will not be implemented.
whodey08
offline
offline
Its just an option people. No different than the option to share your attributes with team mates or just GM's or noone! If you don't want to share your tactics than don't! But let the option be there for those that don't care. Why do people make the silliest of things into the most complicated of issues. 
BagO'Chips
offline
offline
Originally posted by whodey08
Its just an option people. No different than the option to share your attributes with team mates or just GM's or noone! If you don't want to share your tactics than don't! But let the option be there for those that don't care. Why do people make the silliest of things into the most complicated of issues.
Because it'll start becoming: Oh, you don't want to open your tactics? Off the Depth Chart.
Originally posted by Diamond Spade
i think it comes down to money. Who spends more the owner or the agent?
even though what u say is true. the amount of money needed to manage a team doesnt compare to the amount of money needed to maintain a player. which is probably y this will not be implemented.
It's actually up for vote.
Its just an option people. No different than the option to share your attributes with team mates or just GM's or noone! If you don't want to share your tactics than don't! But let the option be there for those that don't care. Why do people make the silliest of things into the most complicated of issues.
Because it'll start becoming: Oh, you don't want to open your tactics? Off the Depth Chart.
Originally posted by Diamond Spade
i think it comes down to money. Who spends more the owner or the agent?
even though what u say is true. the amount of money needed to manage a team doesnt compare to the amount of money needed to maintain a player. which is probably y this will not be implemented.
It's actually up for vote.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by BagO'Chips
Reading comprehension = 0?
Maybe you missed fogie's post.
Unless the owner is the coordinator, him seeing your tactics is meaningless.
Reading comprehension = 0?
Maybe you missed fogie's post.
Unless the owner is the coordinator, him seeing your tactics is meaningless.
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by BagO'Chips
Because it'll start becoming: Oh, you don't want to open your tactics? Off the Depth Chart.
How is that different from "sharing attributes with GM's or "don't share with anyone" ? That option is still there though....isn't it?
Edited by whodey08 on Oct 22, 2012 09:55:32
BagO'Chips
offline
offline
Originally posted by whodey08
How is that different from "sharing attributes with GM's or "don't share with anyone" ? That option is still there though....isn't it?
Maybe I am understanding this wrong or you are understanding me wrong. You said 'It's only an option'. While it is only an option, if agents decide to keep their tactics unshared, the owner/coordinator will say 'Ok, I'll take you off the depth chart then'.
How is that different from "sharing attributes with GM's or "don't share with anyone" ? That option is still there though....isn't it?
Maybe I am understanding this wrong or you are understanding me wrong. You said 'It's only an option'. While it is only an option, if agents decide to keep their tactics unshared, the owner/coordinator will say 'Ok, I'll take you off the depth chart then'.
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by BagO'Chips
Maybe I am understanding this wrong or you are understanding me wrong. You said 'It's only an option'. While it is only an option, if agents decide to keep their tactics unshared, the owner/coordinator will say 'Ok, I'll take you off the depth chart then'.
They can do that now if you don't share your attributes with GM's but that option is still there for the agent to decide. The agent can select "share with noone" and the owner/coordinator could remove them from the depth chart for not sharing their attributes but that option is there isn't it
Maybe I am understanding this wrong or you are understanding me wrong. You said 'It's only an option'. While it is only an option, if agents decide to keep their tactics unshared, the owner/coordinator will say 'Ok, I'll take you off the depth chart then'.
They can do that now if you don't share your attributes with GM's but that option is still there for the agent to decide. The agent can select "share with noone" and the owner/coordinator could remove them from the depth chart for not sharing their attributes but that option is there isn't it
Edited by whodey08 on Oct 22, 2012 10:03:17
BagO'Chips
offline
offline
Originally posted by whodey08
They can do that now if you don't share your attributes with GM's but that option is still there for the agent to decide.
Yes, I know this. But the point is that the option will become meaningless when it becomes mandatory for it to be open.
They can do that now if you don't share your attributes with GM's but that option is still there for the agent to decide.
Yes, I know this. But the point is that the option will become meaningless when it becomes mandatory for it to be open.
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by BagO'Chips
Yes, I know this. But the point is that the option will become meaningless when it becomes mandatory for it to be open.
Wow....you just don't get it do you
Yes, I know this. But the point is that the option will become meaningless when it becomes mandatory for it to be open.
Wow....you just don't get it do you
whodey08
offline
offline
Why would it be mandatory for it to be open? Because the owner could bench you if you don't?? The owner could bench you if you don't share your attributes with him but that option is still there for the agent to decide. Let the agent have the option to decide if he wants to share tactics just like he has the option to decide if he wants to share his attributes.
Edited by whodey08 on Oct 22, 2012 10:06:05
BagO'Chips
offline
offline
Originally posted by whodey08
Why would it be mandatory for it to be open? Because the owner could bench you if you don't?? The owner could bench you if you don't share your attributes with him but that option is still there for the agent to decide. Let the agent have the option to decide if he ants to share tactics as well.
Originally posted by whodey08
Wow....you just don't get it do you
Why would it be mandatory for it to be open? Because the owner could bench you if you don't?? The owner could bench you if you don't share your attributes with him but that option is still there for the agent to decide. Let the agent have the option to decide if he ants to share tactics as well.
Originally posted by whodey08
Wow....you just don't get it do you
BagO'Chips
offline
offline
I understand what you are saying. Leave it up to the player to be able to open or close his tactics. And that option will be there if this is implemented.
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by BagO'Chips
I understand what you are saying. Leave it up to the player to be able to open or close his tactics. And that option will be there if this is implemented.
There is no reason it shouldn't be implemented is my point. Apparently you think there is reason for it to not be implemented which is where we just have to agree to disagree.
I can't think of one single reason to not allow the agent the option is all.
I understand what you are saying. Leave it up to the player to be able to open or close his tactics. And that option will be there if this is implemented.
There is no reason it shouldn't be implemented is my point. Apparently you think there is reason for it to not be implemented which is where we just have to agree to disagree.
I can't think of one single reason to not allow the agent the option is all.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
