User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > Would Tunnel Vision work for a blitzing LB?
Page:
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
King SA's (at this point from my experiences)

FS > DB > HoS > Blitz = HH
Edited by Homage on Oct 19, 2012 10:02:14
 
whodey08
offline
Link
 
Sidebar question: (not worried about SA's or VA's or how CB blitzing is or anything)

Just generally speaking:

Are blitzing LB's still useless in the current SIM the way they were useless in last season's SIM? Is it worth building a specific blitzing LB for that purpose only with the way things currently are?

Edited by whodey08 on Oct 19, 2012 10:07:58
Edited by whodey08 on Oct 19, 2012 10:07:25
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by whodey08
Sidebar question: (not worried about SA's or VA's or how CB blitzing is or anything)

Just generally speaking:

Are blitzing LB's still useless in the current SIM the way they were useless in last season's SIM? Is it worth building a specific blitzing LB for that purpose only with the way things currently are?



Definitely not useless since pressure actually means something in this sim... but it shouldn't mean as much as it does right now. I'd much rather see sacks/knockdowns etc control the passing game than OMG SOMEONE IS NEAR ME BAD THROW
 
Dr. Showtime
DANG
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by whodey08
Sidebar question: (not worried about SA's or VA's or how CB blitzing is or anything)

Just generally speaking:

Are blitzing LB's still useless in the current SIM the way they were useless in last season's SIM? Is it worth building a specific blitzing LB for that purpose only with the way things currently are?



blitzing is awesome now
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dr. Showtime
blitzing is awesome now

Not as much for LBs, though.
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Homage
I tried it. Don't bother.


That. Especially with the alternatives out there.
 
whodey08
offline
Link
 
They should just get rid of the damn blitzing archtype for a LB then. Gets frustrating seeing a team dominate with a pure blitzing LB so you create one for yourself just so half way thru his career they are rendered useless and have to retire him.
 
Bane
Baconologist
offline
Link
 
Blitzing LB's are great


Just not for blitzing
 
DarkRogue
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by whodey08
They should just get rid of the damn blitzing archtype for a LB then. Gets frustrating seeing a team dominate with a pure blitzing LB so you create one for yourself just so half way thru his career they are rendered useless and have to retire him.


yup....
 
fogie55
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Homage
King SA's (at this point from my experiences)

FS > DB > HoS > Blitz = HH


so where would tunnel vision, relentless pursuit or big sack fit in this hierarchy?

I'd think its something like something like: FS > BS > DB = HoS > TV > Blitz =HH=RP?
 
T2
Killuh
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by fogie55
so where would tunnel vision, relentless pursuit or big sack fit in this hierarchy?

I'd think its something like something like: FS > BS > DB = HoS > TV > Blitz =HH=RP?


Big Sack? Really?
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
BS is pretty far down the list at this point. I'd say DB/HoS are definitely much more important.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Homage
BS is pretty far down the list at this point. I'd say DB/HoS are definitely much more important.

Disguise Blitz now has value for LBs, but I've never been impressed with Head of Steam. Big Sack is definitely nice if you can reach the quarterback since fumbles are a big benefit.
 
Dr. Showtime
DANG
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

Not as much for LBs, though.


blitzing was the best thing to happen to DEs XD
 
fogie55
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by T♠2♠
Big Sack? Really?


arguable whether worth the investment at end of tree, but if used in EQ seems worthwhile... fumbles are so much more rare than they used to be that every one is sacred
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.