Originally posted by jdbolick
I've already educated you about it ... as long as you do it properly
I'm not sure you're educating anybody in this thread but I'll humour you.
I think the italicized part above is where we differ. You claim there is a definitive way to do things for building .5 major dots, I think there are pretty large differences between how to start a player that needs to be balanced - LB for example, and one that will be less balanced - OL for example.
You spam your build method all over the forum and get irate with people who disagree with you, curtailing intelligent discussion. I think that the very fact that you claim there is a sole, definitive way to build all .5 major dots, regardless of position or use, shows how blinkered you are. I would urge the people reading the forums to be extremely skeptical whenever you post one of your "unquestionable" proofs about how to build, and to consider things in great detail themselves instead.
You gloss over the analysis of entire networks - whole groups of agents who are excellent builders - to bang your lonely drum about this issue. Why not take the time you spend making incorrect posts in the FAQ section to actually analyse this issue for more than a few minutes to come to a proper and detailed conclusion?
I've already educated you about it ... as long as you do it properly
I'm not sure you're educating anybody in this thread but I'll humour you.
I think the italicized part above is where we differ. You claim there is a definitive way to do things for building .5 major dots, I think there are pretty large differences between how to start a player that needs to be balanced - LB for example, and one that will be less balanced - OL for example.
You spam your build method all over the forum and get irate with people who disagree with you, curtailing intelligent discussion. I think that the very fact that you claim there is a sole, definitive way to build all .5 major dots, regardless of position or use, shows how blinkered you are. I would urge the people reading the forums to be extremely skeptical whenever you post one of your "unquestionable" proofs about how to build, and to consider things in great detail themselves instead.
You gloss over the analysis of entire networks - whole groups of agents who are excellent builders - to bang your lonely drum about this issue. Why not take the time you spend making incorrect posts in the FAQ section to actually analyse this issue for more than a few minutes to come to a proper and detailed conclusion?
Edited by mandyross on Oct 2, 2012 15:00:18






























