Warrior General Games

No more difficult than it already is. Actually may finally add something to the game to get people excited again and be able to do something. Game has been really dropping off.

Not hard to make plays and put in an AI to tag though really. Only have to do it once.

NGTH

Originally posted by coreyls18
No more difficult than it already is. Actually may finally add something to the game to get people excited again and be able to do something. Game has been really dropping off.

Not hard to make plays and put in an AI to tag though really. Only have to do it once.

I agree.......I am just imaging some plays like from the Big I formation where you could have a blocking WR, Power HB, Scat FB, Receiving TE, and blocking TE on the field at the same time.....LOL

I would have no idea how to defend that

Yeah as an OC I want to have which linemen I want and which HBs/WRs/TEs that I want in on 3rd down plays. I suggested this last year and got shot down for it. I forgot, we're not replicating football here are we

Originally posted by whodey08
I agree.......I am just imaging some plays like from the Big I formation where you could have a blocking WR, Power HB, Scat FB, Receiving TE, and blocking TE on the field at the same time.....LOL

I would have no idea how to defend that

Here's the thing; if there was more flexibility in the AI's, they could possibly do away with the need to tag most of the time and it would lead to a man-on-on situation where the correct guys are all on the field to guard whichever package is out there. It might just be a matter of intense scouting and defensive play creation based on formations.

When it comes to tagging from what I've seen, 20% know how to do so effectively. The other 80% doesn't have a clue. But even with the point of the Big I Formation, the flexibility of having the exact right players on the field for that formation could do away with the need to tag anybody unless there is also a running QB on the field in that package.

Originally posted by SlashNDash
My personal opinion is that it being a NGTH is just flat out ridiculous. It goes against the archetype system as a whole. Why build a run stuffing DE if you can't try to place him specifically on run plays? What's the point of the pass rushing DT? What's the point of the possession WR, etc..

If you can't place the archetypes into the positions they need to be in, then scrap the archetype system as a whole. The lack of flexibility makes it largely redundant.

u think its realistic to have 2 of everything? cuz thats what will happen 1 offense for running 1 offense for passing 1 defense for stuffing the run 1 defense for stopping the pass.

srsly cmon

This is has been a confirmed ngth thing for awhile.