You're using spin, bt%x2 and pq% as AEQ pieces right ?
I was aiming my QB to be a bit different, instead of being able to run and pass at once, being able to with a switch of EQ going from one to the other, which will be hell in terms of choosing which pieces of AEQ to use.
I was thinking of the passing kit being 3xAEQ and 1x normal, and the opposite for the rushing kit, being able to switch between pieces of CEQ as well...
Here's what I was thinking so far:
Passing kit:
AEQ1: THR/PQ%
AEQ2: THR/TTS SA
AEQ3: THR/PQ%
EQ1: THR
CEQ: BT%/THR/Pocket passer
Rushing kit:
AEQ1: SPD/BT%
EQ1: SPD
EQ2: SPD
EQ3: SPD
CEQ: BT%/SPD/Scrambler
Aiming at 90ish agility and vision. The objective is not only to test dual-threat but also how much spin and TTS can help break sacks in passing plays.
What do you think JD?
I was aiming my QB to be a bit different, instead of being able to run and pass at once, being able to with a switch of EQ going from one to the other, which will be hell in terms of choosing which pieces of AEQ to use.
I was thinking of the passing kit being 3xAEQ and 1x normal, and the opposite for the rushing kit, being able to switch between pieces of CEQ as well...
Here's what I was thinking so far:
Passing kit:
AEQ1: THR/PQ%
AEQ2: THR/TTS SA
AEQ3: THR/PQ%
EQ1: THR
CEQ: BT%/THR/Pocket passer
Rushing kit:
AEQ1: SPD/BT%
EQ1: SPD
EQ2: SPD
EQ3: SPD
CEQ: BT%/SPD/Scrambler
Aiming at 90ish agility and vision. The objective is not only to test dual-threat but also how much spin and TTS can help break sacks in passing plays.
What do you think JD?






























