User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > On Side Kicks
Page:
 
Alky
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by hatchman
-1 from me it would be something that would end up being a can of worms that screwed the sim completely up. there would also be those owners that made the mistake of actually doing the onside kicks in the wrong situations or even everytime they kicked off. so this is a bad idea in my opinion.


Just another person saying not to make a suggestion because they might break the game. Or because idiots can potentially screw up.


If you used this logic then there shouldnt be any suggestions ever.
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Thunder66
I'd want 2 new ST's depth charts though (Onside Kick team and Hands Team (onside return)).


Oh yeah would need their own DCs for sure.

Especially if you use my suggestion that does not consider speed at all.

By the way, I have not played "real" football, just sandlot and college intra-murals. And if we had onside kicks in that I wasn't on the field for them, I only remember regular kicks and returns (and man nothing like full speed collisions without a stitch of gear to spell Ouch! lol). So if anyone has more insight on what would go into skill checks by all means sound off.
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Alky
Just another person saying not to make a suggestion because they might break the game. Or because idiots can potentially screw up.


If you used this logic then there shouldnt be any suggestions ever.


Yeah, the same camp that complained about the "King Me" expansion to Checkers.
 
hatchman
Goat Father
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Alky
Just another person saying not to make a suggestion because they might break the game. Or because idiots can potentially screw up.


If you used this logic then there shouldnt be any suggestions ever.


You really need to stop thinking you know the reasoning behind my opinion. I never said not to make suggestions I just don't agree with this one.
 
Mauler
Tsalagi
offline
Link
 
-1, I would have to side with hatch on this one as before GLB moves forward they really need to fix all the crap that is broke first. This may be a good suggestion at some point in the future, but it has very poor timing to say the least now.
 
Burns1221
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mauler
-1, I would have to side with hatch on this one as before GLB moves forward they really need to fix all the crap that is broke first. This may be a good suggestion at some point in the future, but it has very poor timing to say the least now.


this.
 
Link
 
i dont disagree 100 % but i know if it did happen 99 % of glb would bitch about it. Like they already bitch about everything else.
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mauler
-1, I would have to side with hatch on this one as before GLB moves forward they really need to fix all the crap that is broke first. This may be a good suggestion at some point in the future, but it has very poor timing to say the least now.


As to the validity of your interest in prioritization, I agree.

As to the validity of that being a reason to -1 an idea, I do not.

Firstly, broken game features have their own forum - to wit bugs

Secondly, this is the suggestions forum where suggestions are made as to things it would be nice to add to the game, regardless of timing.

Thirdly, Bort has exhibited a tendency to add features while bug hunting. Probably different people doing these tasks, at least it usually is.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by yello1
As to the validity of your interest in prioritization, I agree.

As to the validity of that being a reason to -1 an idea, I do not.

Firstly, broken game features have their own forum - to wit bugs

Secondly, this is the suggestions forum where suggestions are made as to things it would be nice to add to the game, regardless of timing.

Thirdly, Bort has exhibited a tendency to add features while bug hunting. Probably different people doing these tasks, at least it usually is.


+1
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tigerbloodwinning
i dont disagree 100 % but i know if it did happen 99 % of glb would bitch about it. Like they already bitch about everything else.


Diversity is a good thing.

The more things to btch about the better
 
Link
 
Originally posted by yello1
Diversity is a good thing.

The more things to btch about the better


Good point. I +1
 
ProfessionalKop
Gangstalicious
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tigerbloodwinning
i dont disagree 100 % but i know if it did happen 99 % of glb would bitch about it. Like they already bitch about everything else.


you shut your face. your dot is cut from the mighty morphin power rangers
 
Link
 
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
you shut your face. your dot is cut from the mighty morphin power rangers


BUt your the good 1 %
 
ProfessionalKop
Gangstalicious
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tigerbloodwinning
BUt your the good 1 %


such a sweet talker, youre back on the team.


but seriously for this suggestion, i dont think its a good idea anytime soon until STs is working properly. blockers need to follow their assignments, people need to stay in their lanes, returners need to actually run to holes not people etc etc.


once STs is fixed, additions can be added.
 
tpaterniti
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
I honestly though this thread was about sidekicks. Like Robin or something.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.