User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Dramatically Increase the Chance that the MVP will get the Gear
Page:
 
Guppy, Inc
offline
Link
 
i know there are many cases of the mvp not getting the eq, but the overall % seems to be pretty high in favor of the mvp as is.
 
Alky
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by All American Dude
At lease only dots on playoff teams should be MVP.


 
Deathblade
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tpaterniti
Not losing?


Originally posted by tpaterniti
Exactly. They have their reward.


Statwhore a QB in Canada Pro one season, move him to your WL team next season after he gets the MVP endorsement.
 
Greywolfmeb
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by merenoise
-1 to OP. The entire purpose of changing the EQ was to discourage stat whoring one dot to the exclusion of the other 54. If the dot that wins the MVP is rewarded with the EQ 70% of the time there is no disincentive to stat whore.


This. - 1 to OP
 
merenoise
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by All American Dude
At lease only dots on playoff teams should be MVP.


Now that is a great suggestion.
 
Diamond Spade
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by merenoise
Now that is a great suggestion.


a great suggestion that dies cuz no one can argue against it.
 
vinman
offline
Link
 
Should be the top 3 not top 5
 
beenlurken
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by vinman
Should be the top 3 not top 5


I would agree with this now that K/Ps have their own MVP
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by All American Dude
At lease only dots on playoff teams should be MVP.


 
Greywolfmeb
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by vinman
Should be the top 3 not top 5


 
tautology
offline
Link
 


I think the fairest thing would be to scale it by total flex purchases made by the agent in question.

That would be the best business move.

 
tautology
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tautology
I think the fairest thing would be to scale it by total flex purchases made by the agent in question.

That would be the best business move.



Good idea!

+1
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Deathblade
So...ignore the reason it was changed in the first place?


almost yes
 
Dub J
offline
Link
 
Why do people only quote me in a non-flaming manner when I have a glaring typo?
 
Daveyjones
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Deathblade
So...ignore the reason it was changed in the first place?


Yup...


-1 to OP
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.