Originally posted by Greenday4537
If you -1, you alienate a large portion of the user base.
If you +1, you alienate another large portion of the user base.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
I say +1 because a game where you have to wait two days for anything interesting to happen is pretty lame.
I agree with this statement more so than most others. I do disagree however becuase for the one side all your doing is taking away a percentage of agents that may make dots that are potential recruits. Nothing more nothing less.
On the flip side if there is a large enough amount of people that would play the game the other way with games being played daily then I would think that it is a completely different can of worms because they CANT do it the way they want where the other people can.
Basically group A "might" lose a percentage of agents.
Group B would gain a whole new style of play thus making them spend more money on flew faster because seasons would go by quicker making the game more money.
If you -1, you alienate a large portion of the user base.
If you +1, you alienate another large portion of the user base.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
I say +1 because a game where you have to wait two days for anything interesting to happen is pretty lame.
I agree with this statement more so than most others. I do disagree however becuase for the one side all your doing is taking away a percentage of agents that may make dots that are potential recruits. Nothing more nothing less.
On the flip side if there is a large enough amount of people that would play the game the other way with games being played daily then I would think that it is a completely different can of worms because they CANT do it the way they want where the other people can.
Basically group A "might" lose a percentage of agents.
Group B would gain a whole new style of play thus making them spend more money on flew faster because seasons would go by quicker making the game more money.
