User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Motivation Points - a way to put the under utilized Temporary Boost system to work
Page:
 
Outlaw Dogs
offline
Link
 
You are just assuming no one temps boosts, I do it all the time and it's great.
 
Skoll Wolfrun
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by Burger Kang

+1, I can't really see the logic behind having a game feature that is not used.

An alternative suggestion would be to make temporary boost cost less BT so that it may be a more efficient use of the BTs.

Though in long-term dot building I don't see where it would ever be very efficient as a won game means very little in terms of the dot's career, thus why this suggestion makes perfect sense to allow an already existing and as far as I know balanced and fully functioning system to merit more use, but not having to sacrifice long-term success to do so.


Exactly

Really I do not know why you are losing out to McDowalls.


fyp : he is Burger Kang, not King.

As for the OP: I use the temp boost from time to time. But the way training maximizing is available, there is little reason to use it. Rather have the permanent bonuses over the temporary ones.
Edited by Skoll Wolfrun on Mar 16, 2012 17:36:08
 
hatchman
Goat Father
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by yello1
I think he may be saying that if you have 100 players on 50 teams you would be hard pressed to get all the memos of when to boost stats and which stats to boost.

In that limited context he may have a point.

But I do not think its a terribly compelling one.


I think you would be alot better off to stick to arguing your points and stop assuming that you know what everyone else means. seriously your beginning to go back to your pompous ways.
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
You are just assuming no one temps boosts, I do it all the time and it's great.


Well you CANT do it all the time unless you trade away alot of SPs in training to have a large stock pile. Eventually you're gonna run out of BT.

 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by hatchman
I think you would be alot better off to stick to arguing your points and stop assuming that you know what everyone else means. seriously your beginning to go back to your pompous ways.


Nothing pompous in trying to keep the peace.
 
hatchman
Goat Father
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by hatchman

I think you would be alot better off to stick to arguing your points and stop assuming that you know what everyone else means. seriously your beginning to go back to your pompous ways.


Nothing pompous in trying to keep the peace.


do I need to post the definition again?
 
Skinny Lister
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by hatchman
do I need to post the definition again?


Oh no, he may have to leave his bridge unattended for a few minutes to give us a vocabulary lesson-I'm all ears.

Originally posted by yello1
Well you CANT do it all the time unless you trade away alot of SPs in training to have a large stock pile. Eventually you're gonna run out of BT.




Even if you could do it all the time, I think that the system itself has plenty of strategy within itself.

You have to decide which games to use them in, what stats to use them on and what not... I don't feel like the trade for long-term effects for short-term ones is needed when there is plenty of strategy in the proposed system without that.

I feel like making this less of an option and more a core part of the game could only improve the game play, particularly for those people only making a few players.
Edited by Burger Kang on Mar 17, 2012 07:16:58
 
hatchman
Goat Father
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Burger Kang
Originally posted by hatchman

do I need to post the definition again?


Oh no, he may have to leave his bridge unattended for a few minutes to give us a vocabulary lesson-I'm all ears.

Originally posted by yello1

Well you CANT do it all the time unless you trade away alot of SPs in training to have a large stock pile. Eventually you're gonna run out of BT.




Even if you could do it all the time, I think that the system itself has plenty of strategy within itself.

You have to decide which games to use them in, what stats to use them on and what not... I don't feel like the trade for long-term effects for short-term ones is needed when there is plenty of strategy in the proposed system without that.

I feel like making this less of an option and more a core part of the game could only improve the game play, particularly for those people only making a few players.


go back and send us all one of your copy and paste PM's again and then PM block us. I truly enjoyed laughing at you
 
Outlaw Dogs
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs

You are just assuming no one temps boosts, I do it all the time and it's great.


Well you CANT do it all the time unless you trade away alot of SPs in training to have a large stock pile. Eventually you're gonna run out of BT.



I can when I can and want to I don't have to every game but can do it when I can do it. again you are just assuming that you know what everyone in the game is doing which is simply not true.
 
hatchman
Goat Father
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
Originally posted by yello1

Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs


You are just assuming no one temps boosts, I do it all the time and it's great.


Well you CANT do it all the time unless you trade away alot of SPs in training to have a large stock pile. Eventually you're gonna run out of BT.



I can when I can and want to I don't have to every game but can do it when I can do it. again you are just assuming that you know what everyone in the game is doing which is simply not true.


I agree with you here if a team is built decent at all they shouldn't have to use Temp boosts but maybe once or twice a season against teams that are as good as they are or maybe a little better. the people that would be wanting this suggestion implemented are the ones that either are getting beaten by better built players or are just looking to get a freebie edge in some way.
 
Skinny Lister
offline
Link
 
Or, maybe the people who want this suggestion think its a good idea because it turns and already existing system into a more in depth system that allows the dot builder just a tiny bit more choices to make on a daily basis.

I'm aware a lot of people own 100 dots and would consider anything more "to do" a bad thing, but owning only one dot I would for sure find making more choices on a daily basis for my dot to be a positive thing.

I don't care if I lose 200 times over and over because of it that has shit to do with it, I like this suggestion because it is a good idea.
 
Alky
offline
Link
 
I like the idea.


With that being said how the hell did I get a ban from forum posting with the reason being I didnt add to the OP but yet daily on here I see people attack yellow time and time again without anyone getting the ban stick.

Good to see there is favoritism on GLB.

Yello some of your ideas suck and some are good. Please keep posting and for the people who dont like them all you have to do is say your piece and move on. Why troll.
 
Outlaw Dogs
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Alky
I like the idea.


With that being said how the hell did I get a ban from forum posting with the reason being I didnt add to the OP but yet daily on here I see people attack yellow time and time again without anyone getting the ban stick.

Good to see there is favoritism on GLB.

Yello some of your ideas suck and some are good. Please keep posting and for the people who dont like them all you have to do is say your piece and move on. Why troll.


It's not who you know it's who reports you that gets you banned.
 
Ken1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Alky
Yello some of your ideas suck and some are good. Please keep posting and for the people who dont like them all you have to do is say your piece and move on. Why troll.


I'm with you on this. In the past I've probably hated 3/4 of Yello's ideas. Lately, it's been more 50/50. I don't know if that's chance or if one of us is thinking differently. But even when I hated 3/4 of his ideas, I never trolled him.

I like this idea if implemented in a relatively weak form; but if you hate it, say so and, if you want to, say why you hate it. You shouldn't say you hate the guy who posted it.

If his suggestions annoy you so much that you can't stand to even read them, then just skip over threads that show him as the OP. There's no need for it to get personal.
 
ultrajer
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Burger Kang
Or, maybe the people who want this suggestion think its a good idea because it turns and already existing system into a more in depth system that allows the dot builder just a tiny bit more choices to make on a daily basis.

I'm aware a lot of people own 100 dots and would consider anything more "to do" a bad thing, but owning only one dot I would for sure find making more choices on a daily basis for my dot to be a positive thing.

I don't care if I lose 200 times over and over because of it that has shit to do with it, I like this suggestion because it is a good idea.


You sure you only been here 11 days?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.