+1. This idea has been floated around for a while now. Doubt it will happen though.
Forum > Suggestions > Allow owners the ability to let their Gm's setup scrims.
Cryptotich
offline
offline
No reason this couldn't be implimented. It's basically the same code letting CO's have the ability.
Originally posted by jk3312
A very good idea and easy to implement. +10000
this must be the flex one pissed of GM will use on useless scrimages if you piss him off one day.
IMO Co-Owner is enough for Scimages... Ask the Owner/Co-Owner for the scrimage and im sure they will have no problem setting it up (Or get your own team in that age group and request it yourself)
-1 to OP
A very good idea and easy to implement. +10000
this must be the flex one pissed of GM will use on useless scrimages if you piss him off one day.
IMO Co-Owner is enough for Scimages... Ask the Owner/Co-Owner for the scrimage and im sure they will have no problem setting it up (Or get your own team in that age group and request it yourself)
-1 to OP
Alky
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cleveland Browns
this must be the flex one pissed of GM will use on useless scrimages if you piss him off one day.
IMO Co-Owner is enough for Scimages... Ask the Owner/Co-Owner for the scrimage and im sure they will have no problem setting it up (Or get your own team in that age group and request it yourself)
-1 to OP
Just an example of why this would be good, especially now that there are instant scrims.
Lets say on my team that I was the D-COORD. I log on and change a few things and move a few of my D lineman around and want to see how my changes did. I can go ahead and quickly setup 4 instant scrims against the same team and see what the overall outcome was and how my new tactics and DC changes worked out. I could run 2 scrims 1 way and 2 scrims the other and see what worked best. I would have quick info at my fingertips.
You never know when people are going to log in so instead of having to wait and guess I could just make it happen.
this must be the flex one pissed of GM will use on useless scrimages if you piss him off one day.
IMO Co-Owner is enough for Scimages... Ask the Owner/Co-Owner for the scrimage and im sure they will have no problem setting it up (Or get your own team in that age group and request it yourself)
-1 to OP
Just an example of why this would be good, especially now that there are instant scrims.
Lets say on my team that I was the D-COORD. I log on and change a few things and move a few of my D lineman around and want to see how my changes did. I can go ahead and quickly setup 4 instant scrims against the same team and see what the overall outcome was and how my new tactics and DC changes worked out. I could run 2 scrims 1 way and 2 scrims the other and see what worked best. I would have quick info at my fingertips.
You never know when people are going to log in so instead of having to wait and guess I could just make it happen.
jk3312
offline
offline
Originally posted by Cleveland Browns
this must be the flex one pissed of GM will use on useless scrimages if you piss him off one day.
IMO Co-Owner is enough for Scimages... Ask the Owner/Co-Owner for the scrimage and im sure they will have no problem setting it up (Or get your own team in that age group and request it yourself)
-1 to OP
Read the OP.... I stated making gms use own flex as an option for this. I do co-own teams, but unless Im mistaken, co-owners cannot schedule scrims either.
this must be the flex one pissed of GM will use on useless scrimages if you piss him off one day.
IMO Co-Owner is enough for Scimages... Ask the Owner/Co-Owner for the scrimage and im sure they will have no problem setting it up (Or get your own team in that age group and request it yourself)
-1 to OP
Read the OP.... I stated making gms use own flex as an option for this. I do co-own teams, but unless Im mistaken, co-owners cannot schedule scrims either.
DTRAIN
offline
offline
Originally posted by jk3312
Read the OP.... I stated making gms use own flex as an option for this. I do co-own teams, but unless Im mistaken, co-owners cannot schedule scrims either.
Co owners can indeed schedule scrims....EXCEPT THE FREE ONE
Read the OP.... I stated making gms use own flex as an option for this. I do co-own teams, but unless Im mistaken, co-owners cannot schedule scrims either.
Co owners can indeed schedule scrims....EXCEPT THE FREE ONE
whodey08
offline
offline
Originally posted by Alky
Just an example of why this would be good, especially now that there are instant scrims.
Lets say on my team that I was the D-COORD. I log on and change a few things and move a few of my D lineman around and want to see how my changes did. I can go ahead and quickly setup 4 instant scrims against the same team and see what the overall outcome was and how my new tactics and DC changes worked out. I could run 2 scrims 1 way and 2 scrims the other and see what worked best. I would have quick info at my fingertips.
You never know when people are going to log in so instead of having to wait and guess I could just make it happen.
Just an example of why this would be good, especially now that there are instant scrims.
Lets say on my team that I was the D-COORD. I log on and change a few things and move a few of my D lineman around and want to see how my changes did. I can go ahead and quickly setup 4 instant scrims against the same team and see what the overall outcome was and how my new tactics and DC changes worked out. I could run 2 scrims 1 way and 2 scrims the other and see what worked best. I would have quick info at my fingertips.
You never know when people are going to log in so instead of having to wait and guess I could just make it happen.
jk3312
offline
offline
Originally posted by DTRAIN
Co owners can indeed schedule scrims....EXCEPT THE FREE ONE
Thanks for the correction, I see that now.
But that still doesnt effect (affect, i get confused
) the OP
Co owners can indeed schedule scrims....EXCEPT THE FREE ONE
Thanks for the correction, I see that now.
But that still doesnt effect (affect, i get confused
) the OPTaySC
offline
offline
Don't like this idea at all.
There is a reason a team has an owner and that the owner can set a co-owner (which should be mutual ownership of sorts), but 2 people are plenty.
-1
There is a reason a team has an owner and that the owner can set a co-owner (which should be mutual ownership of sorts), but 2 people are plenty.
-1
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
