Warrior General Games

Originally posted by shadeau
I dont know if the title really explains what I want to suggest.

I know GLB has been trying to make coaches for the game and for whatever reason it doesnt fly.

My suggestion is that when a Agent signs up to play this game that person will then have to choose Archetypes for the kind of Owner , Coach , Recruiter , Offensive / Defensive and Special Teams Coordinator ect. That he would like to be if that person chose to be any of these things in the game. Old Agents can be let to choose one , its obviously going to be easier for the older Agents who are already used in these positions to pick whats best for them.

The are many Agents that are just happy being Agents and creating players and thats it but, to those who do want to be Owners or Offensive Coordinators they would have a Archetype set. A team Owner can then choose which way He/She would like to build their team.

Now I think you would only get points to skill up your Archetype only if you are set into that specific position and you wouldnt get points like a created player would, you would get it after a season of experience and maybe every other season. The Archetypes would give your team very small bonuses so as it wouldnt get unfair or out of control. Also like many teams towards the end of the season when they get late into the playoffs , Owners love to add everyone on the team as some kind of GM to get them all Trophies.

That should not count as experience points for those agents. There should be a limit on how many positions can be used on a team so that the Agents that are really running the team earn the skill points to get the bonuses. If the Agents on the team want to get a Trophy GLB should just allow them to get it with out being placed as GMS.





-1

Originally posted by shadeau
Omg , I said new Agents get over that part. ( sometimes I think peeps just want to grab something if anything just to shoot it down ) And if anyone really read it youd see that I didnt know what to properly title this thread , its obviously not what GLB wanted with Coaches. Its about giving Agents who are Coordinators or Owners to give their team a tiny bonus for the Archetypes they have chosen and have the most experience in because of their hard work.

When GLB adds something new to the game they let everyone start over and do it like they did with the players we all created or did everyone forget?

Make it Agents period.

New and Old. Who said the GLB team couldnt make it where it would allow you to switch Archetypes if you would rather be something else?

I also never said that if one Agent runs both the Offense and Defense , he wouldnt get points for it. The closest thing I did mention was that Gms that where added for the sake of getting a trophy shouldnt get points , it should only be given to the Agents that actually ran a certain position.

Its a suggestion that can be worked on and improved. A building point. Someone comes up with an idea and a team works on it to fix the kinks or bugs to make the idea work.





get your panties out of a bunch you made a suggestion and others made feedback on what you posted. if you meant something different you should have added that to the original post instead of getting bent out of shape when people didn't agree with it. we are not in your head we do not know what you are thinking. all we have to go on is what you type and post as a suggestion. and your suggestion clearly stated new agents you didn't mention anything about any of the other stuff you listed in the above post. but even with the new added stuff in the post I quoted of yours I still say -1.

*please contribute to the discussion, without trolling users*

Originally posted by yello1
Hello Kettle!

again you are wrong where have you ever seen me get pissy over someone not agreeing with one of my suggestions. show me where I have done that P.J. and then you can run your yapper that the pot is calling the kettle black. I do not get pissy at all on these forums your P.J. just perceives it that way. seriously Yello1 if you were half as smart as you think you are you would be dangerous.

I'm not really seeing the point of this suggestion.

Originally posted by hatchman
Yello1 if you were half as smart as you think you are you would be dangerous.

Or were you Pot?

Oh and +1 to this wondrous idea again.

Coaches are a part of football and they do have personalities and styles which would be good to model in the game.

Would Pompous be an archtype?

Originally posted by yello1
Or were you Pot?

Oh and +1 to this wondrous idea again.

Coaches are a part of football and they do have personalities and styles which would be good to model in the game.

Would Pompous be an archtype?



again I asked you to show me where I had gotten all pissy like you over someone not agreeing with one of my suggestions. are you working on that or you just gonna come back with your usual BS?

Seriously, you'll both be getting a ban if you don't quit you bickering.

If you want to have it out, go to an appropriate forum, NOT suggestions.

THis is the last warning you'll get.

doobas™

Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by yello1

Or were you Pot?

Oh and +1 to this wondrous idea again.

Coaches are a part of football and they do have personalities and styles which would be good to model in the game.

Would Pompous be an archtype?



again I asked you to show me where I had gotten all pissy like you over someone not agreeing with one of my suggestions. are you working on that or you just gonna come back with your usual BS?

Hatch you constantly flame people, this was the point. Your holier than thou manner of posting in general makes your tossing around the PJA term amusing to me, thats all. The details of any particular exchange are irrelevant to that point.

Its okay, I do it too. I am just hosing your cage a bit.

Did you catch the Soup Nazi in the commercial last night? That wasn't the same actor though.

And this IS a good idea.

Originally posted by doobas
Seriously, you'll both be getting a ban if you don't quit you bickering.

If you want to have it out, go to an appropriate forum, NOT suggestions.

THis is the last warning you'll get.

doobas™

okay to be fair, you posted that while I was typing.

Sorry.

Originally posted by yello1
okay to be fair, you posted that while I was typing.

Sorry.



No worries. Just quit the bickering in this forum, from now on, and we're all good

doobas™

Originally posted by joe
Originally posted by RiverRat2

I am pretty sure we did this already and your side lost.

NO FRIGGIN COACHES

-1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Why?

Wasn't the argument against coaches that the bugs weren't out and there were more important things to do?

Which is fair I suppose. But eventually the bugs will be out as much as they are in any software and the big things will be done.

What would be so wrong about coaches THEN?

Shula, Landry, Lombardi. These are guys who are a part of the on the field game. Why not represent them with something more concrete and on the "field" than the players own personality which rarely makes itself felt in a replay?

Originally posted by doobas
Originally posted by yello1

okay to be fair, you posted that while I was typing.

Sorry.



No worries. Just quit the bickering in this forum, from now on, and we're all good

doobas™

What indian was it that said "I will fight no more forever"?

Probably one of the KC Chiefs or maybe the Redskins.