User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > New Formations
Page:
 
Dub J
offline
Link
 
reduce the amount of formations imo
 
Link
 
Originally posted by CDZYO
Would love them (and an I-3WR), but Catch22 has said new formations are happylittletrees.


I don't make the formations
 
mstackpole
offline
Link
 
+1 The more formations the better.
 
darncat
offline
Link
 
2WR same side as well
 
XtremeTony
offline
Link
 
Here are some of my formation suggestions...

Offense
-I formation - Twin
-Pro Set - 3 WR
-Trey (2 WR & TE on 1 side & WR on opposite side.
-Shotgun 2 Backs 3 WR

Defense
-2-4-5 Nickel (something I've been trying to push for many seasons now.
-1-5-5 Nickel
-2-3-6 Dime
 
Link
 
at very least, i think we should have the option to sub a different player in big I defense than a cb. there is only 1 wr so why must i have 2 cbs? also it would be nice if you could line that cb up on the te and move your lbs out wider if you're not blitzing them
 
Robbnva
offline
Link
 
can we add a true wildcat formation while we are at it?
 
Thunder66
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by XtremeTony
Here are some of my formation suggestions...

Offense
-I formation - Twin
-Pro Set - 3 WR
-Trey (2 WR & TE on 1 side & WR on opposite side.
-Shotgun 2 Backs 3 WR


+1

and an Offensive Play Creator whilst were adding things to the wish list.
 
Dr. Brawler
offline
Link
 
+1
 
Bane
Baconologist
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Animus Maximus
at very least, i think we should have the option to sub a different player in big I defense than a cb. there is only 1 wr so why must i have 2 cbs? also it would be nice if you could line that cb up on the te and move your lbs out wider if you're not blitzing them


you can drag the CB2 to other side of field , if you so wish

build some CB's like coverage LB and put them in CB2 custom slot.

that being said, I still +1 this, especially the defense formation.

But it has been stated it is NGTH

ETA: except casual, you cant drag the CB2 over in casual
Edited by Behn on Jan 24, 2012 06:47:38
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Behn
Originally posted by Animus Maximus

at very least, i think we should have the option to sub a different player in big I defense than a cb. there is only 1 wr so why must i have 2 cbs? also it would be nice if you could line that cb up on the te and move your lbs out wider if you're not blitzing them


you can drag the CB2 to other side of field , if you so wish

build some CB's like coverage LB and put them in CB2 custom slot.

that being said, I still +1 this, especially the defense formation.

But it has been stated it is NGTH

ETA: except casual, you cant drag the CB2 over in casual


you can drag him over to the other side of the field, but not the middle. the logic of this confuses me. about the cbs, i don't think it would be a great idea to build a run stopping cb for 7 seasons only to find the build is obsolete by the time he gets to pro which is something i would be very concerned about happening
 
Hethradiah
offline
Link
 
+2
 
merenoise
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Behn
you can drag the CB2 to other side of field , if you so wish

build some CB's like coverage LB and put them in CB2 custom slot.


And watch them get torched on every formation but Big I? No thanks.
 
Bane
Baconologist
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by merenoise
And watch them get torched on every formation but Big I? No thanks.


you must not build good coverage LB's
 
Dr. Showtime
DANG
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by merenoise
And watch them get torched on every formation but Big I? No thanks.


lolwut

if your CBs dont have good tackle skills...
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.