wat
Forum > Suggestions > Raise Teams Owned Limit
Favre4Ever
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
I have 7 teams and that just aint so.
It just means you hire OCs and DCs to run the teams. More opportunities for more fun for more people.
Anyway its simple economics. Supply has exceeded demand. Demand is artificially capped. Remove the cap to use up the excess supply.
It's so simple, yet you can't seem to grasp it.
GLB creates X number of teams. GLB gets popular. There are more owners than teams available. Bort makes more teams. And more teams. And then allows members to buy more teams. And adds more teams and then more teams. Every year it seem slike there are more leagues on top of leagues, teams on top of teams... The whole system has become diluted and saturated with filth.
Like someone said earlier... there are too many teams out there as is. If anything, they need to reel it back in.
-1 on this suggestion
I have 7 teams and that just aint so.
It just means you hire OCs and DCs to run the teams. More opportunities for more fun for more people.
Anyway its simple economics. Supply has exceeded demand. Demand is artificially capped. Remove the cap to use up the excess supply.
It's so simple, yet you can't seem to grasp it.
GLB creates X number of teams. GLB gets popular. There are more owners than teams available. Bort makes more teams. And more teams. And then allows members to buy more teams. And adds more teams and then more teams. Every year it seem slike there are more leagues on top of leagues, teams on top of teams... The whole system has become diluted and saturated with filth.
Like someone said earlier... there are too many teams out there as is. If anything, they need to reel it back in.
-1 on this suggestion
Originally posted by Favre4Ever
Originally posted by yello1
I have 7 teams and that just aint so.
It just means you hire OCs and DCs to run the teams. More opportunities for more fun for more people.
Anyway its simple economics. Supply has exceeded demand. Demand is artificially capped. Remove the cap to use up the excess supply.
It's so simple, yet you can't seem to grasp it.
GLB creates X number of teams. GLB gets popular. There are more owners than teams available. Bort makes more teams. And more teams. And then allows members to buy more teams. And adds more teams and then more teams. Every year it seem slike there are more leagues on top of leagues, teams on top of teams... The whole system has become diluted and saturated with filth.
Like someone said earlier... there are too many teams out there as is. If anything, they need to reel it back in.
-1 on this suggestion
Its simpler than that.
There are 19 CPU owned teams in Regional and National Pro. Thats unsatisfactory.
Some one should own them.
If you let people own more teams, those teams would not be CPU owned.
QED
Originally posted by yello1
I have 7 teams and that just aint so.
It just means you hire OCs and DCs to run the teams. More opportunities for more fun for more people.
Anyway its simple economics. Supply has exceeded demand. Demand is artificially capped. Remove the cap to use up the excess supply.
It's so simple, yet you can't seem to grasp it.
GLB creates X number of teams. GLB gets popular. There are more owners than teams available. Bort makes more teams. And more teams. And then allows members to buy more teams. And adds more teams and then more teams. Every year it seem slike there are more leagues on top of leagues, teams on top of teams... The whole system has become diluted and saturated with filth.
Like someone said earlier... there are too many teams out there as is. If anything, they need to reel it back in.
-1 on this suggestion
Its simpler than that.
There are 19 CPU owned teams in Regional and National Pro. Thats unsatisfactory.
Some one should own them.
If you let people own more teams, those teams would not be CPU owned.
QED
Moretti
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
Its simpler than that.
There are 19 CPU owned teams in Regional and National Pro. Thats unsatisfactory.
Some one should own them.
If you let people own more teams, those teams would not be CPU owned.
QED
regardless of the ownership are there players available to fill those teams? i doubt it
Its simpler than that.
There are 19 CPU owned teams in Regional and National Pro. Thats unsatisfactory.
Some one should own them.
If you let people own more teams, those teams would not be CPU owned.
QED
regardless of the ownership are there players available to fill those teams? i doubt it
Originally posted by Moretti
Originally posted by yello1
Its simpler than that.
There are 19 CPU owned teams in Regional and National Pro. Thats unsatisfactory.
Some one should own them.
If you let people own more teams, those teams would not be CPU owned.
QED
regardless of the ownership are there players available to fill those teams? i doubt it
The team I had hoisted to National from Regional was able to fill itself in about 48 hours, so was the team that went through that last season, so yeah I think so.
Those teams had players before the owner sold them after all.
Except TEs, stupid big formations made TEs hard to get.
But thats another thread.
Originally posted by yello1
Its simpler than that.
There are 19 CPU owned teams in Regional and National Pro. Thats unsatisfactory.
Some one should own them.
If you let people own more teams, those teams would not be CPU owned.
QED
regardless of the ownership are there players available to fill those teams? i doubt it
The team I had hoisted to National from Regional was able to fill itself in about 48 hours, so was the team that went through that last season, so yeah I think so.
Those teams had players before the owner sold them after all.
Except TEs, stupid big formations made TEs hard to get.
But thats another thread.
spartan822
offline
offline
Originally posted by merenoise
-1 If anything we need to reign in the amount of teams that any one agent can own. Shouldn't be more than 2 of any given type imo.
-1 If anything we need to reign in the amount of teams that any one agent can own. Shouldn't be more than 2 of any given type imo.
Originally posted by yello1
Its simpler than that.
There are 19 CPU owned teams in Regional and National Pro. Thats unsatisfactory.
Some one should own them.
If you let people own more teams, those teams would not be CPU owned.
QED
so basically you are saying that it is better to have shitty teams owned by a agent rather than have shitty teams owned by CPU's. come on there aren't enough freaking players to fill all these teams now. why let people own even more and water down the player pool even more.
seriously Yello1 I have no problem how many teams people own if they are actually competitive. but just owning teams for the sake of saying you own them doesn't work for most people.
Just looking at your teams Yello1 you have 4 teams that are at the Pro level instead of fielding 4 seperate teams. you could combine rosters and field 2 teams with the best builds of those 4 teams. and you could conceivably have a shot at winning championships with those 2 teams. but because you chose to own 4 teams around the same age level you are just watering down the player pool at that level and hurting all 4 of your own teams. so none of the 4 teams will be as good as they conceivably should be. in short by you owning 4 teams in that age level you are hurting not only your chances at winning a championship. but you are screwing the guys that have signed with your teams at that level. because you are hurting those players chances of winning a championship.
and before someone pops off it isn't all about winning those pretty little Gold trophies. I will say this if you aren't interested in winning those pretty little gold trophies then why waste the time and money to build players. If you aren't about winning then why not just focus on doing what you like on this game. like posting in forums or making a ton of suggestions or whatever.
Its simpler than that.
There are 19 CPU owned teams in Regional and National Pro. Thats unsatisfactory.
Some one should own them.
If you let people own more teams, those teams would not be CPU owned.
QED
so basically you are saying that it is better to have shitty teams owned by a agent rather than have shitty teams owned by CPU's. come on there aren't enough freaking players to fill all these teams now. why let people own even more and water down the player pool even more.
seriously Yello1 I have no problem how many teams people own if they are actually competitive. but just owning teams for the sake of saying you own them doesn't work for most people.
Just looking at your teams Yello1 you have 4 teams that are at the Pro level instead of fielding 4 seperate teams. you could combine rosters and field 2 teams with the best builds of those 4 teams. and you could conceivably have a shot at winning championships with those 2 teams. but because you chose to own 4 teams around the same age level you are just watering down the player pool at that level and hurting all 4 of your own teams. so none of the 4 teams will be as good as they conceivably should be. in short by you owning 4 teams in that age level you are hurting not only your chances at winning a championship. but you are screwing the guys that have signed with your teams at that level. because you are hurting those players chances of winning a championship.
and before someone pops off it isn't all about winning those pretty little Gold trophies. I will say this if you aren't interested in winning those pretty little gold trophies then why waste the time and money to build players. If you aren't about winning then why not just focus on doing what you like on this game. like posting in forums or making a ton of suggestions or whatever.
Edited by hatchman on Dec 17, 2011 14:13:54
merenoise
offline
offline
Originally posted by -Achanceb4-
link me someone who had 9 teams.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/home.pl?user_id=39385
link me someone who had 9 teams.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/home.pl?user_id=39385
Originally posted by merenoise
Originally posted by -Achanceb4-
link me someone who had 9 teams.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/home.pl?user_id=39385
and boy all of those teams look somuch better than CPU owned teams
Originally posted by -Achanceb4-
link me someone who had 9 teams.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/home.pl?user_id=39385
and boy all of those teams look somuch better than CPU owned teams
Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by yello1
Its simpler than that.
There are 19 CPU owned teams in Regional and National Pro. Thats unsatisfactory.
Some one should own them.
If you let people own more teams, those teams would not be CPU owned.
QED
so basically you are saying that it is better to have shitty teams owned by a agent rather than have shitty teams owned by CPU's. come on there aren't enough freaking players to fill all these teams now. why let people own even more and water down the player pool even more.
seriously Yello1 I have no problem how many teams people own if they are actually competitive. but just owning teams for the sake of saying you own them doesn't work for most people.
Just looking at your teams Yello1 you have 4 teams that are at the Pro level instead of fielding 4 seperate teams. you could combine rosters and field 2 teams with the best builds of those 4 teams. and you could conceivably have a shot at winning championships with those 2 teams. but because you chose to own 4 teams around the same age level you are just watering down the player pool at that level and hurting all 4 of your own teams. so none of the 4 teams will be as good as they conceivably should be. in short by you owning 4 teams in that age level you are hurting not only your chances at winning a championship. but you are screwing the guys that have signed with your teams at that level. because you are hurting those players chances of winning a championship.
and before someone pops off it isn't all about winning those pretty little Gold trophies. I will say this if you aren't interested in winning those pretty little gold trophies then why waste the time and money to build players. If you aren't about winning then why not just focus on doing what you like on this game. like posting in forums or making a ton of suggestions or whatever.
You are under the mistaken impression that if I don't own those teams they will somehow vanish and not sully our fair game.
But thats not the case.
So long as their are ownerless teams, the cap on team ownership should be expanded. Allow demand to meet supply.
And your premise is not correct, by the way. I HAD just one team at the National Pro level (or any pro) for many seasons, the OTM being in Oceania Pro since S16 and the Grace only going up in S25 and the Word this offseason.
Players are like a gas, they will fill the volume.
Originally posted by yello1
Its simpler than that.
There are 19 CPU owned teams in Regional and National Pro. Thats unsatisfactory.
Some one should own them.
If you let people own more teams, those teams would not be CPU owned.
QED
so basically you are saying that it is better to have shitty teams owned by a agent rather than have shitty teams owned by CPU's. come on there aren't enough freaking players to fill all these teams now. why let people own even more and water down the player pool even more.
seriously Yello1 I have no problem how many teams people own if they are actually competitive. but just owning teams for the sake of saying you own them doesn't work for most people.
Just looking at your teams Yello1 you have 4 teams that are at the Pro level instead of fielding 4 seperate teams. you could combine rosters and field 2 teams with the best builds of those 4 teams. and you could conceivably have a shot at winning championships with those 2 teams. but because you chose to own 4 teams around the same age level you are just watering down the player pool at that level and hurting all 4 of your own teams. so none of the 4 teams will be as good as they conceivably should be. in short by you owning 4 teams in that age level you are hurting not only your chances at winning a championship. but you are screwing the guys that have signed with your teams at that level. because you are hurting those players chances of winning a championship.
and before someone pops off it isn't all about winning those pretty little Gold trophies. I will say this if you aren't interested in winning those pretty little gold trophies then why waste the time and money to build players. If you aren't about winning then why not just focus on doing what you like on this game. like posting in forums or making a ton of suggestions or whatever.
You are under the mistaken impression that if I don't own those teams they will somehow vanish and not sully our fair game.
But thats not the case.
So long as their are ownerless teams, the cap on team ownership should be expanded. Allow demand to meet supply.
And your premise is not correct, by the way. I HAD just one team at the National Pro level (or any pro) for many seasons, the OTM being in Oceania Pro since S16 and the Grace only going up in S25 and the Word this offseason.
Players are like a gas, they will fill the volume.
Greywolfmeb
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
Players are like a gas, they will fill the volume.
This is bullshit... the last bunch have seasons of half filled rosters all over GLB say it's you that is wrong.
Players are like a gas, they will fill the volume.
This is bullshit... the last bunch have seasons of half filled rosters all over GLB say it's you that is wrong.
Originally posted by Greywolfmeb
Originally posted by yello1
Players are like a gas, they will fill the volume.
This is bullshit... the last bunch have seasons of half filled rosters all over GLB say it's you that is wrong.
Are you suggesting my teams are some how wonderous things that attract recruits?
Because I filled a half and a full team in a couple of days both times. Without network connections and no particular cachet about the team or its performance.
Half empty teams exist because their owner is not putting the time into the admittedly clunky recruiting system to put his teams face in front of enough players. Usually, I submit, because his team is a low level farm club he doesnt care about to begin with. Its just a training program for his big team. But whatever the reason, you can find recruits if you try hard enough these days. Maybe not 55 or the perfect guys you want, but still.
Originally posted by yello1
Players are like a gas, they will fill the volume.
This is bullshit... the last bunch have seasons of half filled rosters all over GLB say it's you that is wrong.
Are you suggesting my teams are some how wonderous things that attract recruits?
Because I filled a half and a full team in a couple of days both times. Without network connections and no particular cachet about the team or its performance.
Half empty teams exist because their owner is not putting the time into the admittedly clunky recruiting system to put his teams face in front of enough players. Usually, I submit, because his team is a low level farm club he doesnt care about to begin with. Its just a training program for his big team. But whatever the reason, you can find recruits if you try hard enough these days. Maybe not 55 or the perfect guys you want, but still.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
