User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Separate Global Rankings for Pee Wee
Page:
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Kaerey
Simple solution right here, just allow us to sort by "Pee Wee"


Even this would be great...I will add this to the OP
 
We_Rule
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by CDZYO
Originally posted by The Greatest DTD

That is only for one league in Pee Wee...I am talking about a ranking system that includes Copper, Silver, and Gold all together with a separate ranking from the Global rankings.


+1. It's silly that PeeWee (and World League, for that matter) weren't included in the age filters. PeeWee isn't Rookie.


It isn't? Same age dots, so they should be considered different somehow? Not trying to troll, I just don't do Peewee...... what is the difference and why would it be important to rank them separately?
 
LordEvil
offline
Link
 
Pee Wee gold teams > Rookie teams at the same level
 
We_Rule
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by LordEvil
Pee Wee gold teams > Rookie teams at the same level


Not sure I understand how TBH....... wouldn't a 16-0 rookie team be equal to a 16-0 peewee team?
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by We_Rule
It isn't? Same age dots, so they should be considered different somehow? Not trying to troll, I just don't do Peewee...... what is the difference and why would it be important to rank them separately?


As stated before Pee Wee is really a league of its own where many agents only play that league. Rookie leagues you just keep moving up. Pee Wee Gold is like the World League for Pee Wee so to answer your question, no pee wee is not the same as rookie. Yea they might be the same level dots, but the leagues are completely different.

Edit: Too put this in very understandable terms...Rookie team owners don't spend a good amount of money on their dots then retire them all then stay in rookie the next season, Pee Wee does.
Edited by The Greatest DTD on Nov 28, 2011 17:20:15
Edited by The Greatest DTD on Nov 28, 2011 17:15:58
Edited by The Greatest DTD on Nov 28, 2011 17:14:47
 
We_Rule
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Greatest DTD
Originally posted by We_Rule

It isn't? Same age dots, so they should be considered different somehow? Not trying to troll, I just don't do Peewee...... what is the difference and why would it be important to rank them separately?


As stated before Pee Wee's is really a league of its own where many agents only play that league. Rookie leagues you just keep moving up. Pee Wee Gold is like the World League for Pee Wee so to answer your question, no pee wee is not the same as rookie. Yea they might be the same level dots, but the leagues are completely different.


I understand it is a different league....... so is casual, and I think they are lumped in with regular leagues too, right? I guess I'm still not "getting it".
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by We_Rule
I understand it is a different league....... so is casual, and I think they are lumped in with regular leagues too, right? I guess I'm still not "getting it".


Also stated earlier in this thread Casual teams actually have a chance to be ranked number 1 in global rankings, Pee Wee teams do not. I checked a while ago and saw a Casual team at 47th in GLB. The highest ranked Pee Wee team is maybe 900?
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
I mean even if the suggestion that came from Kaerey happens I would be happy. I would just like to see all of the Pee Wee League rankings combined together instead of rankings for each separate league.
Edited by The Greatest DTD on Nov 28, 2011 17:19:18
 
bmac1188
offline
Link
 
Rookie leagues are making players for the long term. PW leagues are making players to be successful immediately. Therefore the builds between a PW team and a Rookie team will look drastically different by the end of the first season and IMO the PW team that is 16-0 will most likely be > the Rookie team that is 16-0.
 
bmac1188
offline
Link
 
+1

All DTD is asking for is ranking PW teams independent of other leagues to give a better representation of the strength of a team based solely on PW as it is the only ladder that resets at the end of each season, conversely to all other leagues which are mainly built for the long haul
 
Antonine
offline
Link
 
+1
 
We_Rule
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Greatest DTD
Originally posted by We_Rule

I understand it is a different league....... so is casual, and I think they are lumped in with regular leagues too, right? I guess I'm still not "getting it".


Also stated earlier in this thread Casual teams actually have a chance to be ranked number 1 in global rankings, Pee Wee teams do not. I checked a while ago and saw a Casual team at 47th in GLB. The highest ranked Pee Wee team is maybe 900?


There are no rookie or sophomore teams ranked high either though. Would be kinda like a high school team being ranked #1 in the USA period....... pretty sure LSU, Bama, or the Green Bay Packers might think otherwise though. It is about player age, and then talent....... even the most talented 13 year old on the planet won't be ranked very high compared to those all growed up guys.

That being said, seems like it should be sortable for Peewee though so you could see who is ranked better than whom I guess. Just don't think a whole separate system for lolpeewee is necessary in any way TBH.
 
Kaerey
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bmac1188
Rookie leagues are making players for the long term. PW leagues are making players to be successful immediately. Therefore the builds between a PW team and a Rookie team will look drastically different by the end of the first season and IMO the PW team that is 16-0 will most likely be > the Rookie team that is 16-0.


You'd be surprised, if we played a game on Day 32, Odds are you would have a Rookie Team with all level 19 players, and a Pee Wee Team with all 16s.

Rookie teams should have players that are boosted 6 times vs 3 for the Pee Wee so it's just another reason the leagues are different.

 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by We_Rule
There are no rookie or sophomore teams ranked high either though. Would be kinda like a high school team being ranked #1 in the USA period....... pretty sure LSU, Bama, or the Green Bay Packers might think otherwise though. It is about player age, and then talent....... even the most talented 13 year old on the planet won't be ranked very high compared to those all growed up guys.

You just pointed out the main reason that Pee Wee rankings should be separate. High school rankings are separate from college/NFL, College rankings are separate from High School/NFL, and NFL rankings are separate from College/High School. I agree with you that Pee Wee teams should not be ranked number 1 in GLB, but that is why I am asking that we get our own rankings so that we know who our number 1 team is.

On a side note...I think Alabama might be able to play a close game with the Colts

That being said, seems like it should be sortable for Peewee though so you could see who is ranked better than whom I guess. Just don't think a whole separate system for lolpeewee is necessary in any way TBH.

Even if we don't get our own rankings I would like to be able to see all of Pee Wee combined together to see who the top teams in ALL of Pee Wee are.




 
We_Rule
offline
Link
 
Bama would prb beat the Colts...... if they somehow acquired a kicker.

I understand what you are saying, but to me, it should be a global one-list system, with appropriate filters added. The best team in Peewee gold is still just a low-level team and should be ranked as such....... you should be able to filter it out though for bragging rights within Peewee, just like other age levels. The king of the hill needs to be global though, and a separate ranking system for peewee is just one more activity in lulziness where that "precious time" should be spent doing something a whole lot more meaningful....... like making the game better. Frankly, most peewee teams should be ranked higher than rookie teams of the same age, since they are more balanced in builds. Then of course we'll get 101 whine posts about "how is my undefeated rookie team ranked lower than a 13-3 peewee team"...... you get the point, you can't please everyone.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.