Warrior General Games

Originally posted by kwankwan
Well... it will probably be +12% later on... and most of the SAs are taken care of. I don't see why not if he's not going with SDC. Could use the CEQ in DB%, but meh...

I've never really been a fan of sdc - but if I get the rest of the sa's where I want them, I don't see why not. And I'm glad you get my point. why not ff%? Got everything else.

Because it's a waste. 6% to deflect or make tackle would help more than 12 to ff.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Because it's a waste. 6% to deflect or make tackle would help more than 12 to ff.

until he forces a fumble and then we can blame it on rng right?

judging by your str and tckl you play on wrap up, so this ff piece have no effect on your dot at all, if he gets a ff it wont be because of this piece...

Originally posted by marcaodl
judging by your str and tckl you play on wrap up, so this ff piece have no effect on your dot at all, if he gets a ff it wont be because of this piece...

k, good thing its the custom eq so I can replace later if I don't like it

I would trade his Sure Tackler for Long Reach. If you swapped the strength and tackling he'd be much better. I like the AEQ except the Force Fumble. I'd have gone with Shut Down Coverage or Smooth Operator instead.

But, if I went with Smooth Operator, I'd have switched 3rd Down Stopper for Show Boat.

Definitely more strength and confidence. I'd also like to see the CEQ in PD% and some more SB.

Originally posted by BadBuc99
I would trade his Sure Tackler for Long Reach. If you swapped the strength and tackling he'd be much better. I like the AEQ except the Force Fumble. I'd have gone with Shut Down Coverage or Smooth Operator instead.

But, if I went with Smooth Operator, I'd have switched 3rd Down Stopper for Show Boat.

Trading sure tackler for long reach is a terrible idea. Swapping strength for tackling is a terrible idea. SDC is overrated, Smooth Operator might be the worst SA in the game. 3rd Down Stopper is a Huge VA especially if you force starters on defense. And showboat? cb's might get 3-4 pd's a game.

You trolling again?

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Definitely more strength and confidence. I'd also like to see the CEQ in PD% and some more SB.

Yeah, this is definitely the plan. Still training strength so I'm not sure how high I'll go, and I'll probably put a lot of his sp he has now into sb. Not sure how far I'll go with confidence though.

Originally posted by bug03
Trading sure tackler for long reach is a terrible idea. Swapping strength for tackling is a terrible idea. SDC is overrated, Smooth Operator might be the worst SA in the game. 3rd Down Stopper is a Huge VA especially if you force starters on defense. And showboat? cb's might get 3-4 pd's a game.

You trolling again?

Absolutely not......... My reasoning is based on some things written here..... http://www.scribd.com/doc/12971499/DLight03s-Elite-Pass-Coverage-LB-Guide

Originally posted by BadBuc99
Absolutely not......... My reasoning is based on some things written here..... http://www.scribd.com/doc/12971499/DLight03s-Elite-Pass-Coverage-LB-Guide

Wow, I've never seen that before, but its more than a year old for sure (before the coverage sliders)

Originally posted by bug03
Wow, I've never seen that before, but its more than a year old for sure (before the coverage sliders)

I still believe the philosophy is solid.

Originally posted by BadBuc99
I still believe the philosophy is solid.

k

Originally posted by BadBuc99
I would trade his Sure Tackler for Long Reach. If you swapped the strength and tackling he'd be much better. I like the AEQ except the Force Fumble. I'd have gone with Shut Down Coverage or Smooth Operator instead.

But, if I went with Smooth Operator, I'd have switched 3rd Down Stopper for Show Boat.

This is a terrible idea.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
This is a terrible idea.

Only to those who don't understand disparity!