Some people need to fix their builds.
Ubasstards
offline
offline
ITS tries to post a thread for some serious discussion and you people just troll as usual
Edited by Ubasstards on May 23, 2011 22:13:22
Tully Mars
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ubasstards
i try to post a thread for some serious discussion and you people just troll as usual
oops wrong account
i try to post a thread for some serious discussion and you people just troll as usual
oops wrong account
Ronnie Brown 23
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ubasstards
ITS tries to post a thread for some serious discussion and you people just troll as usual
lvl 60 dots in regional pro elite
also would have to open builds or disclose strength/agility/blocking and know the strength/agility of the defenders
basically another shit kai thread intended to get more people to violate rules so that kai can snitch
ITS tries to post a thread for some serious discussion and you people just troll as usual
lvl 60 dots in regional pro elite
also would have to open builds or disclose strength/agility/blocking and know the strength/agility of the defenders
basically another shit kai thread intended to get more people to violate rules so that kai can snitch
Edited by Ronnie Brown 23 on May 23, 2011 22:23:31
Ubasstards
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ronnie Brown 23
lvl 60 dots in regional pro elite
also would have to open builds or disclose strength/agility/blocking and know the strength/agility of the defenders
basically another shit kai thread intended to get more people to violate rules so that kai can snitch
strength on WRs doesnt work as well in blocking due to the nerf on cakes.
Do you think WRs hold blocks well in general or not?
lvl 60 dots in regional pro elite
also would have to open builds or disclose strength/agility/blocking and know the strength/agility of the defenders
basically another shit kai thread intended to get more people to violate rules so that kai can snitch
strength on WRs doesnt work as well in blocking due to the nerf on cakes.
Do you think WRs hold blocks well in general or not?
Ronnie Brown 23
offline
offline
I think WRs hold blocks too well considering that most of them don't have over 20 blocking or 50 strength
Papapoud
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ronnie Brown 23
I think WRs hold blocks too well considering that most of them don't have over 20 blocking or 50 strength
I think WRs hold blocks too well considering that most of them don't have over 20 blocking or 50 strength
Robbnva
online
online
Originally posted by Ubasstards
my 80 strength WRs should have been pancaking all CBs
+1
my 80 strength WRs should have been pancaking all CBs
+1
bug03
offline
offline
Originally posted by Papapoud
Originally posted by Ronnie Brown 23
I think WRs hold blocks too well considering that most of them don't have over 20 blocking or 50 strength
on the same note, cb's with 40 strength and 50 tackling should probably miss half their tackles against an hb
Originally posted by Ronnie Brown 23
I think WRs hold blocks too well considering that most of them don't have over 20 blocking or 50 strength
on the same note, cb's with 40 strength and 50 tackling should probably miss half their tackles against an hb
Edited by bug03 on May 23, 2011 22:38:28
Robbnva
online
online
Originally posted by bug03
on the same note, cb's with 40 strength and 50 tackling should probably miss half their tackles against an hb
More than half
on the same note, cb's with 40 strength and 50 tackling should probably miss half their tackles against an hb
More than half
bug03
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ubasstards
i guess if they break more blocks and miss more tackles nothing really changed
I think it would be more realistic though. A broken tackle could possibly slow down the dot enough for the defense to recover. A block held past 5 seconds in the secondary by a non FB or TE is just bizarre.
i guess if they break more blocks and miss more tackles nothing really changed
I think it would be more realistic though. A broken tackle could possibly slow down the dot enough for the defense to recover. A block held past 5 seconds in the secondary by a non FB or TE is just bizarre.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
