User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Rate my Player > Level 49 Possession WR
Page:
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MadCow DTD
if only you had a VPB


What is that going to tell me? Is there a feature to the VPB that simulates how my build will work in the WL when he is level 74? If so the VPB just became viable to me again.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by snakes22
What about run blocking or going up against CB's / Safety with 50 strength / 70 tackling ? Knocked loose going to become a problem?


psh...run blocking? What do you think this is, a casual dot?
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
I gave up on Poss WRs, remember how he worked for you .. its all about speed and spin, what a waste of a game
 
Rage Kinard
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Ya. 140 speed was pretty much what I was shooting for on these builds.

That is the main thing too. Basing it off current WR builds is hard just because there is no telling what kind of maniacs these new arch secondaries are gonna be like.

My WL WR which is kind of a lesser version of this guy has 4 dropped passes in the last 3 seasons.

Strength - 32
Carrying - 48
Confidence - 40
Stamina - 66

He also has a 68% completion rate in that time. Now taking into account my catching, jumping, vision, and agility would all already be higher than my WL WR....is taking Carrying to that second cap really worth the SP?


What kind of training are you doing? All you have to do is cap it to 49, then if you are quad training train it up to about 54. From level 56-73 you will get roughly 3 pts in ALG. It would only cost 6 sp to get it to 60.

It won't need to be that high against a lot of DBs (since the common build is going to over invest in speed to get it to 155+), but I have a feeling there will be at least a few CBs running around with 140-145 speed, 90 agility, 80 vision, 70 jumping, 70+ tackling, 60+ strength, 60 stamina, 50 confidence
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MadCow DTD
I gave up on Poss WRs, remember how he worked for you .. its all about speed and spin, what a waste of a game


nonsense. Swift and the top WR in WL right now bring hope to what was a gruesome world for Possession WR's everywhere.
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
my Poss WR was good until Pro level.

back in the day when 130 speed was fast

130 speed
87 agility
70 jump
78 catching
60 strength and carry
65 vision

route running and sticky hands and catch ball % and he sucked dick the last 4 seasons of his life.

Minus 1 100 yard w/l playoff game vs socal.... Fuck POS Wrs
Edited by MadCow DTD on May 16, 2011 20:26:39
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rage Kinard
What kind of training are you doing? All you have to do is cap it to 49, then if you are quad training train it up to about 54. From level 56-73 you will get roughly 3 pts in ALG. It would only cost 6 sp to get it to 60.

It won't need to be that high against a lot of DBs (since the common build is going to over invest in speed to get it to 155+), but I have a feeling there will be at least a few CBs running around with 140-145 speed, 90 agility, 80 vision, 70 jumping, 70+ tackling, 60+ strength, 60 stamina, 50 confidence


Right now multi training...stamina, agility, jumping, vision. Once I roll over agility ill replace that with either carrying or strength. Or should I replace both jumping and agility for strength/carrying?
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by MadCow DTD
my Poss WR was good until Pro level.

back in the day when 130 speed was fast

130 speed
77 agility
70 jump
78 catching
60 strength and carry
65 vision

route running and sticky hands and catch ball % and he sucked dick the last 4 seasons of his life.

Minus 1 100 yard w/l playoff game vs socal.... Fuck POS Wrs


I think he could have been more valuable had I known what I know now tbh.
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
wtf do you know now, Ill take a PM
 
MadCow420
offline
Link
 
im just hesitant to waste all that damn flex again on a WR that sucks ass again
Edited by MadCow DTD on May 16, 2011 20:29:47
 
Rage Kinard
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Right now multi training...stamina, agility, jumping, vision. Once I roll over agility ill replace that with either carrying or strength. Or should I replace both jumping and agility for strength/carrying?


You shouldn't be training jumping at 58. You should have switched out at around 55/56 and over 80% then trained something else until after you capped it and then started training it again. The only reason for not doing it that way is if you didn't have an extra attribute unlocked and couldn't afford to spend the 20 BT to unlock a 4th attribute. If you couldn't do it then, you shouldn't do it now.

I'd definitely train carrying before strength. Carrying gets ALGs and strength doesn't. To many it doesn't matter, but if I can get an extra 3-4 attribute pts above the 2nd cap vs below, I'll take it especially if I'm not giving anything up end build. You can train strength later.
Edited by Rage Kinard on May 16, 2011 20:31:41
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
And that my friends is where my training knowledge starts failing me.

Thanks Rage. Ill move over to carrying from agility and see where that takes me for now. That should buy me some time to see whether or not ill need more strength or confidence come a season or so from now.
 
bug03
offline
Link
 
No, either quit training jumping or cap it at 61 and keep training it. Training after 55 was where you went wrong
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bug03
No, either quit training jumping or cap it at 61 and keep training it. Training after 55 was where you went wrong


He will be capping it 61 next.
 
Forbin
offline
Link
 
ITT: People discussing how to make a build 0.09% more efficient!


Also
Originally posted by MadCow DTD
I gave up on Poss WRs, remember how he worked for you .. its all about speed and spin, what a waste of a game


It's all about the essay's, holmes.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1665523&pbp_id=2939994
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.