Originally posted by woahtuff
I think if you look for the best shutdown CB, a ton of tackles doesn't meen that the CB isn't any good, you have to check and see where those tackles came from. Agent Ocho on our own Reykjavik Aggies had 95 tackles last season, but only about 1/3 of those came from pass plays to his man. The rest came from ST, rushing plays or tackling somebody else's man.
Also, few PDs doesn't account for a shutdown CB either, he could of had a ton of passes come his way, but he just sucks and can't even get PDs. A better measure of a shutdown CB is completions allowed/pass attempts that went to his man. IMO it's the only way to really figure out who is a better shutdown CB.
that's almost exactly what I'm talking about. A great CB, stuck in the #1 spot could statistically (tackles/pd's) look worse than a second or 3rd string CB. However from what I've seen the #1 CBs can often take their side out of a play completely so the QB doesn't even bother throwing there. That's great coverage.
I know with my CB when I line him up as the #1 CB I'll have a solid game with maybe 1 tackle and 2 PD's against a balanced team. I could then put him in the #2 spot against a similarly balanced team and have 8 tackles (6 from rushes), 8 pd's, 1 int, 1 FF
Last edited Jun 24, 2008 13:59:52