Originally posted by Ruger7mmmag
Ronnie, if you were in WL, chances are your APV is going to be substantially higher than the typical team you'd be "sorted with". So you'd still be in WL or whatever top tier they called it. Remember, all the other teams of similar stature won't be too far off of you either. For instance, how many teams have an APV of over 1100? It's a small percentage compared to where most Pro teams will put up there where it's more around 1050.
Remember, the formula above weights the APV way more than record. The record really only helps separate out the teams of similar APV to decide which team should be on which side of the fence if there's any debate.
WJ-It's not the height of the golfer but the length of the driver...
Well I know that when we won OPL, our APV was 12th or 14th in OPL (can't remember which). I think the main thing messing it up is sorting through the distribution of positions and their different APV values (e.g. C/QB/DT versus CB, LB, WR).
Ronnie, if you were in WL, chances are your APV is going to be substantially higher than the typical team you'd be "sorted with". So you'd still be in WL or whatever top tier they called it. Remember, all the other teams of similar stature won't be too far off of you either. For instance, how many teams have an APV of over 1100? It's a small percentage compared to where most Pro teams will put up there where it's more around 1050.
Remember, the formula above weights the APV way more than record. The record really only helps separate out the teams of similar APV to decide which team should be on which side of the fence if there's any debate.
WJ-It's not the height of the golfer but the length of the driver...
Well I know that when we won OPL, our APV was 12th or 14th in OPL (can't remember which). I think the main thing messing it up is sorting through the distribution of positions and their different APV values (e.g. C/QB/DT versus CB, LB, WR).






























