Warrior General Games

I'd hate to see eepro go away but something should be done

Originally posted by Rage Kinard
The best may be to just cut down to 4 leagues with each former Nat Pro league becoming a Nat Pro conference


Europe - EEPL conference WEPL conference
North America - USA conference Canada conference
Pacific - South East Asia conference Oceania conference
Atlantic - Africa conference South America conference

and after that what? Another tier between WL and Pro? People want competive National Pro leagues and not another tier.

Btw the solution for competive Pro leagues but NGTH is to remove WL.

Originally posted by Rage Kinard
The best may be to just cut down to 4 leagues with each former Nat Pro league becoming a Nat Pro conference


Europe - EEPL conference WEPL conference
North America - USA conference Canada conference
Pacific - South East Asia conference Oceania conference
Atlantic - Africa conference South America conference

this is not bad all things considered.

Originally posted by Kenshinzen
Btw the solution for competive Pro leagues but NGTH is to remove WL.

dunno .. Buda's WL season last year was the most fun i've had in this game for probably 10 seasons? i certainly get "to each their own". Removing WL doesn't solve the problem at all to my eyes. So you have Sofia, Hood, Mojo all here .. We go from 5 teams that have a shot at gold to 8? out of 32? it's not enough. you'd have to still change the promotion system or something.

Originally posted by Kenshinzen
Originally posted by Kenshinzen

Originally posted by Rage Kinard


The best may be to just cut down to 4 leagues with each former Nat Pro league becoming a Nat Pro conference


Europe - EEPL conference WEPL conference
North America - USA conference Canada conference
Pacific - South East Asia conference Oceania conference
Atlantic - Africa conference South America conference

and after that what? Another tier between WL and Pro? People want competive National Pro leagues and not another tier.



i don't believe that's the case but honestly that threads gotten too long. they need to scrap the vote, revise the message, and revote.

Revote or no, it's the same to me. I want to find a solution and all Pro leagues remain as they're. Don't want 3,4,5,6 or whatever they're proposing. Else I'll say bye-bye to this game (and many others I think).

I think a lot of agents that chose to play in lower level pro, are doing so to rack up stats and win a trophy. there needs to be a reason to bring your level 70 plus players up. if you can win a cup in sectional pro casual jr pee wee league or get crushed in nat pro ... most are choosing to win (stats). And who can blame them, they have spent 10 seasons getting to the point to play pro, only to go to a half ass team. The reason WL works, is there are enough players that want to play at the top. as well as a few nat pro teams that look like they are going to make a run for WL. We need to make Nat Pro worth playing for.


My solution is to keep WL and National pro as is, change the Regional Pro Leagues back down to minor leagues, with generic names.

I would also award a letter, like a lettermans jacket, to each player that earned it

W for WL / P for pro, then a number for how many seasons.

http://i55.tinypic.com/29kustv.jpg

This would incentive-ize playing in the top leagues.
and the agents that want to keep there level 73/75 players in lower levels will not be rewarded.

I would also think about only counting stats that were at Nat Pro only, The Nfl HOF doesn't count NACC stats, and College doesn't count High School...

make it worth while to pay at the right level.

you dont see Ray Lewis or Adrian Peterson playing in the arena league to rack up stats!

This is interesting Raider, you should post this somewhere in Suggestions

just did, but wont hold my breath. I have lost faith in that forum

Originally posted by Kenshinzen
and after that what? Another tier between WL and Pro? People want competive National Pro leagues and not another tier.

Nope.

Just cut down from 256 to 128 national Pro teams.

Then you only have 8 teams promote to WL and 8 teams demote from WL.

The top 12 teams in each WL conference would stay and only the bottom 4 demote.


Basically only teams that are currently able to make playoffs at Nat Pro level would stay Nat Pro.

I personally don't think there are 15,840 players in GLB that are Pro/WL quality.


You can't have a WL and 8 Pro leagues and keep them competitive, if there aren't enough quality players to fill those teams.

Originally posted by Rage Kinard
I personally don't think there are 15,840 players in GLB that are Pro/WL quality.


You can't have a WL and 8 Pro leagues and keep them competitive, if there aren't enough quality players to fill those teams.




I have 55 players coming to EEPL in a few seasons

Originally posted by Thundercat_12
I have 55 players coming to EEPL in a few seasons

In a year....

edit: and they are terrible