Warrior General Games

Originally posted by regoob2
Originally posted by Rage Kinard

Well by that logic any VA or SA having to do with pass rushing is a waste for DTs. Because right now at the WL level, it is virtually impossible to get an effective pass rush from DTs regardless of build, VAs, or SAs.

Not necessarily. I think pass rusher is good. I dont like Technique man because you have to use evasive.

Yes, necessarily.

Originally posted by regoob2
That's what I mean. Tech man for a DT won't really make you a better pass rusher. IMO it's a waste of the VAs for a DT.

That's not what you said at all. You said Power >>>>>>>>> Evasive.
Stats don't lie, they net the same results and same pressure.

Originally posted by regoob2
Not necessarily. I think pass rusher is good. I dont like Technique man because you have to use evasive.

If a WL DT gets more than 5 sacks this season, over 50% are on 3rd/4th down, and that DT has pass rusher, then I will agree with you.

Originally posted by Rage Kinard
If a WL DT gets more than 5 sacks this season, over 50% are on 3rd/4th down, and that DT has pass rusher, then I will agree with you.

My NT who doesn't have pass rusher got both his sacks on 3rd downs.
My DT who does have pass rusher got their sack on 2nd down.

Go figure?

Please show evidence where power pass rush >> evasive. Not >>>>>>, just >>. I'll even settle for >.

It seems more likely to get production from taking a power pass rush build and incorporate evasive pass rush tactics. And technique man certainly fits into that setup.

If there is a better basic theory that can show actual results, please provide something other than dot conjecture and "what should be". Welcome to beta.