Warrior General Games

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Originally posted by coachviking


Can you please stop using the word imply

Are you implying that I'm using that word incorrectly?

No, just that your excessive use of the same word implies that you have a limited vocabulary.

Originally posted by coachviking
No, just that your excessive use of the same word implies that you have a limited vocabulary.




After MEM beats him in a few hours his range of vocabulary will be expanded to include the following excuses....lolregular season, AI was off, SB Hangover and couldn't game plan, bad sim, Bort's fault, bugs etc, etc etc!

Originally posted by cubsluver22
After MEM beats him in a few hours his range of vocabulary will be expanded to include the following excuses....lolregular season, AI was off, SB Hangover and couldn't game plan, bad sim, Bort's fault, bugs etc, etc etc!

Is "cubsluver22 is retarded" an excuse or just a fact?

Originally posted by cubsluver22
After MEM beats him in a few hours his range of vocabulary will be expanded to include the following excuses....lolregular season, AI was off, SB Hangover and couldn't game plan, bad sim, Bort's fault, bugs etc, etc etc!

After the Hedgehogs win, are you going to go all whiny like you did on our forum again?

p sure hogs by 17

Originally posted by cubsluver22
Originally posted by coachviking

No, just that your excessive use of the same word implies that you have a limited vocabulary.




After MEM beats him in a few hours his range of vocabulary will be expanded to include the following excuses....lolregular season, AI was off, SB Hangover and couldn't game plan, bad sim, Bort's fault, bugs etc, etc etc!

Damn it Cubs...Those were going to be my excuses. Not in that order, Super Bowl Hangover was my first choice tbh.

Nice game Wise

Only 1 question

What the hell was this

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1521237&pbp_id=8284271

Originally posted by Dr. Showtime
p sure hogs by 17

You sir are f'ing genius.

Originally posted by Dr. Showtime
p sure hogs by 17

They would have had to score 17 to win by 17.

Just sayin

Originally posted by coachviking
Nice game Wise

Only 1 question

What the hell was this

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1521237&pbp_id=8284271

Was a FB screen. U guys got 2 MLB sacks against it which is whatever without a LG missed vision check.

Good game and impressive win MEM.

The INT and 2 fumbles really hurt us. Should we both make it to day38, I promise to give a better showing.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Originally posted by coachviking

Nice game Wise

Only 1 question

What the hell was this

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1521237&pbp_id=8284271

Was a FB screen. U guys got 2 MLB sacks against it which is whatever without a LG missed vision check.

I meant 4th and 2 at your 32. Ballsy or OOPS

Originally posted by coachviking
I meant 4th and 2 at your 32. Ballsy or OOPS

ballsy. Used to only go for it on the 40+, but this is the first time the chance has backfired this season tbh.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Was a FB screen. U guys got 2 MLB sacks against it which is whatever without a LG missed vision check.

might be. We only run 2 plays against the strong formation at the moment though (2 others in the package at zero 0%) so it's easy to isolate some things.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1521237&pbp_id=8280798 - sack
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1521237&pbp_id=8279752 - completion

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1521237&pbp_id=8284271 - sack
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1521237&pbp_id=8283302 - completion
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1521237&pbp_id=8284261 - completion

I split them up so the dots are all going in the same direction in comparison. Noticed this a while ago that occasionally we'd get a sack with this play and it's good against some running plays as well. Never looked closely at it until this game though (if a 5 minute comparison is considered looking closely). There is only one version of this play in the package and other versions I have in other packages all have the same thing - MLB is set to shallow depth. Notice the spacing between the MLB and the DLine on the plays that are sacks however (when there is a "missed vision check") compared to the ones where there is a completion. MLB is further back on the sacks. I'm not changing the depth (and this like all of our handful of plays we are running is a new DPC play so I can't change the depth on the MLB if he's blitzing) but for whatever reason the dots aren't always starting from the same spot. I'd like them to always start from that slightly further back position please

GG. I expect to see lots of 3-3 MLB blitzes against the strong I in the future.

Originally posted by flaredog
After the Hedgehogs win, are you going to go all whiny like you did on our forum again?

no u