What is the formula you use, because I thought with power rankings was based off of record first and than you use the formula for team with the same record.
Originally posted by demetrius_dew What is the formula you use, because I thought with power rankings was based off of record first and than you use the formula for team with the same record.
But none the less thanks for what you do.
My formula is actually a combination of a bunch of factors. But the most heavily weighted are wins, points scored, points scored against, yards gained, yards given up, turnovers, 3rd down conversion percentages, and percentage of possessions that result in points (higher is good for your offense, lower is good for your defense).
So with my formula, it's entirely possible that a team with a worse record can be above a team with a better record. My reasoning behind allowing this is that a team with a worse record ( say 2-3) may actually be better than a 4-1 team, because maybe the 4-1 team has played the leagues worst teams, whereas the 2-3 team has played some of the leagues best teams....
Originally posted by Stickman Originally posted by demetrius_dew
What is the formula you use, because I thought with power rankings was based off of record first and than you use the formula for team with the same record.
But none the less thanks for what you do.
My formula is actually a combination of a bunch of factors. But the most heavily weighted are wins, points scored, points scored against, yards gained, yards given up, turnovers, 3rd down conversion percentages, and percentage of possessions that result in points (higher is good for your offense, lower is good for your defense).
So with my formula, it's entirely possible that a team with a worse record can be above a team with a better record. My reasoning behind allowing this is that a team with a worse record ( say 2-3) may actually be better than a 4-1 team, because maybe the 4-1 team has played the leagues worst teams, whereas the 2-3 team has played some of the leagues best teams....
So your saying that Fremont is the 6th best team in the league? You really believe that? . . . So your saying that Philly is the 13th best team in the league? You really believe that? . . . Ok I'm done!
Wow, I do not even know why we re-do this forum every week. Stickman you should just edit your post so we can see the changes. This will save all these people the time of posting the same bitches every week. They could just enjoy the rankings or even just quote there previous bitches and complaints.
Originally posted by hutchins929 So your saying that Fremont is the 6th best team in the league? You really believe that? . . . So your saying that Philly is the 13th best team in the league? You really believe that? . . . Ok I'm done!
I really believe that Fremont has the 6th best stats according to my ranking system. And I really believe that Philly has the 13th best stats.
I do, however, doubt that the are the 6th best and 13th best teams in the league. On any given day, there are not 12 teams that would likely beat Philly, and there are not 5 teams that would likely beat Fremont.
Also, remember that my rankings don't account for coaching/tactics, which can help an under-leveled team even the field against a team with higher ranked players.
Originally posted by gassyazz Wow, I do not even know why we re-do this forum every week. Stickman you should just edit your post so we can see the changes. This will save all these people the time of posting the same bitches every week. They could just enjoy the rankings or even just quote there previous bitches and complaints.
Originally posted by facient Originally posted by Fruitbat Bearcat
I have some questions about the Sirius.
Me too i think they cheated !
we didn't cheat it was just a good game to where the coaching came into play with some good scouting of the team. It all came down to kicking an someone on here once said kickers arn't that important to me on here one time.