Thanks for the rankings and taking the time in doing them.
bug03
offline
offline
Originally posted by Plankton
It won't piss me off, because I agree with you on Devonport. We have beaten two good teams, but we are still underleveled. We only have 3 non-ST players on our entire roster that are Level 72 or higher.
But if you keep your roster together you're in great shape
It won't piss me off, because I agree with you on Devonport. We have beaten two good teams, but we are still underleveled. We only have 3 non-ST players on our entire roster that are Level 72 or higher.
But if you keep your roster together you're in great shape
Originally posted by bug03
But if you keep your roster together you're in great shape
Yeah, we have a real strong and loyal core of agents that make up not only Devonport, but our two farm teams. On average, we replace no more than 5 players on Devonport per season, which makes the offseason easier and Chemistry not an issue. We lose an agent every once in a while to boredom with GLB, but I think we will be in good shape for many seasons to come.
But if you keep your roster together you're in great shape
Yeah, we have a real strong and loyal core of agents that make up not only Devonport, but our two farm teams. On average, we replace no more than 5 players on Devonport per season, which makes the offseason easier and Chemistry not an issue. We lose an agent every once in a while to boredom with GLB, but I think we will be in good shape for many seasons to come.
bug03
offline
offline
Originally posted by Plankton
Yeah, we have a real strong and loyal core of agents that make up not only Devonport, but our two farm teams. On average, we replace no more than 5 players on Devonport per season, which makes the offseason easier and Chemistry not an issue. We lose an agent every once in a while to boredom with GLB, but I think we will be in good shape for many seasons to come.
I agree
Yeah, we have a real strong and loyal core of agents that make up not only Devonport, but our two farm teams. On average, we replace no more than 5 players on Devonport per season, which makes the offseason easier and Chemistry not an issue. We lose an agent every once in a while to boredom with GLB, but I think we will be in good shape for many seasons to come.
I agree
JackBeQuick
offline
offline
Much appreciated though, this kind of stuff keeps the game interesting with everyone voicing opinions on where teams should be ranked
Originally posted by JackBeQuick
Much appreciated though, this kind of stuff keeps the game interesting with everyone voicing opinions on where teams should be ranked
+1 I used to do rankings and don't take our banter as criticism of your time and effort. We definitely appreciate the time you put into it and giving us something to debate/discuss.
Much appreciated though, this kind of stuff keeps the game interesting with everyone voicing opinions on where teams should be ranked
+1 I used to do rankings and don't take our banter as criticism of your time and effort. We definitely appreciate the time you put into it and giving us something to debate/discuss.
14 6th Street Savage Swarm, 2-0 Last week: 15
...22 OffTopica Miracle, 0-2 Last week: 21
Lil puzzling, I came within 2 points of beating 6th Street....
...22 OffTopica Miracle, 0-2 Last week: 21
Lil puzzling, I came within 2 points of beating 6th Street....
Punk Rock Jocks
offline
offline
Originally posted by yello1
14 6th Street Savage Swarm, 2-0 Last week: 15
...22 OffTopica Miracle, 0-2 Last week: 21
Lil puzzling, I came within 2 points of beating 6th Street....
6th Street is 2-0, you guys are 0-2. Fwiw, you guys are the second highest 0-2 team. Also, there is no I in team.
14 6th Street Savage Swarm, 2-0 Last week: 15
...22 OffTopica Miracle, 0-2 Last week: 21
Lil puzzling, I came within 2 points of beating 6th Street....
6th Street is 2-0, you guys are 0-2. Fwiw, you guys are the second highest 0-2 team. Also, there is no I in team.
Punk Rock Jocks
offline
offline
Originally posted by Plankton
+1 I used to do rankings and don't take our banter as criticism of your time and effort. We definitely appreciate the time you put into it and giving us something to debate/discuss.
Don't worry, I don't give a shit what you guys say! I'm used to it. I did the Alpha rankings here 2 seasons ago, and I used to do league rankings in SEAPL and SEA AAA back in the day.
+1 I used to do rankings and don't take our banter as criticism of your time and effort. We definitely appreciate the time you put into it and giving us something to debate/discuss.
Don't worry, I don't give a shit what you guys say! I'm used to it. I did the Alpha rankings here 2 seasons ago, and I used to do league rankings in SEAPL and SEA AAA back in the day.
bug03
offline
offline
Originally posted by Punk Rock Jocks
6th Street is 2-0, you guys are 0-2. Fwiw, you guys are the second highest 0-2 team. Also, there is no I in team.
there is when he owns the majority of the dots on the team and does all the gameplanning himself...
6th Street is 2-0, you guys are 0-2. Fwiw, you guys are the second highest 0-2 team. Also, there is no I in team.
there is when he owns the majority of the dots on the team and does all the gameplanning himself...
Punk Rock Jocks
offline
offline
Originally posted by bug03
You're blind faith in Alpha teams is ridiculous.
Devonport is NOT the 5th best team in OPL.... and no offense to them they've got a great team and will probably have a great season, but both their hb's aren't lvl 72, therefore missing 4 speed (as well as all but 1 of the rest of their skill players)
That alone hurts a team so much that its unbelievable.
Death Dealers are a perennial playoff team in alpha and I like their owner a lot, but a RNG does not a better team make.
I don't care where you rank EEA, but at least have some decent reasoning when you post something. Have an opinion, talk shit. Piss somebody off
It's not blind faith, and I do have reasoning behind my rankings. I have Algoma and Cypriot at the top 2 spots because they are the only teams with WL experience. I had Sumatra at #2 in the preseason because when I was doing those rankings, they had one of the highest player values in the league (I know that's not everything, but at the time I didn't have much else to go on) and they were 14-2 last season. Syracuse is #3 because they dominated us in week one, and destroyed Razorback Nation. Death Dealers are #4 because they beat Buda Pests.
Devils are #5 because they because they dominated Sumatra and beat Bora Bora - both very good teams. They may have lower levels, but if they keep playing like a top 5 team, I'm going to keep ranking them in the top 5. If they start losing, I will drop them. Buda Pests are #6 because they beat you guys, but lost to DD.
You guys are 7th because you lost to Buda. Tbh, I thought about moving you guys up, but I couldn't justify ranking you ahead of a team that beat you. I also didn't drop you after your loss, because I didn't think that losing a close game to Buda merited that.
Addicts are 8th because I think they are a top 10 team, and their one loss was to a very good team. That is also why Bora Bora is ranked 9th, and Sumatra is now 10th.
You're blind faith in Alpha teams is ridiculous.
Devonport is NOT the 5th best team in OPL.... and no offense to them they've got a great team and will probably have a great season, but both their hb's aren't lvl 72, therefore missing 4 speed (as well as all but 1 of the rest of their skill players)
That alone hurts a team so much that its unbelievable.
Death Dealers are a perennial playoff team in alpha and I like their owner a lot, but a RNG does not a better team make.
I don't care where you rank EEA, but at least have some decent reasoning when you post something. Have an opinion, talk shit. Piss somebody off

It's not blind faith, and I do have reasoning behind my rankings. I have Algoma and Cypriot at the top 2 spots because they are the only teams with WL experience. I had Sumatra at #2 in the preseason because when I was doing those rankings, they had one of the highest player values in the league (I know that's not everything, but at the time I didn't have much else to go on) and they were 14-2 last season. Syracuse is #3 because they dominated us in week one, and destroyed Razorback Nation. Death Dealers are #4 because they beat Buda Pests.
Devils are #5 because they because they dominated Sumatra and beat Bora Bora - both very good teams. They may have lower levels, but if they keep playing like a top 5 team, I'm going to keep ranking them in the top 5. If they start losing, I will drop them. Buda Pests are #6 because they beat you guys, but lost to DD.
You guys are 7th because you lost to Buda. Tbh, I thought about moving you guys up, but I couldn't justify ranking you ahead of a team that beat you. I also didn't drop you after your loss, because I didn't think that losing a close game to Buda merited that.
Addicts are 8th because I think they are a top 10 team, and their one loss was to a very good team. That is also why Bora Bora is ranked 9th, and Sumatra is now 10th.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.




I'm not the only one that knows 























