that's just because I'm a total Boston homer 
bluur27
offline
offline
Man, some of you guys just can't wait for someone to post something so you can nip at them for whats wrong with it. All you freaking pansies were BEEEEEGGGGGGIIIIINNG for some east rankings. Now you got 2 people doing it, and you bitch and moan. Rankings are never perfect(See BCS) and even for them to have any actual validity, the season needs to be further along. So enjoy what is presented to you, for your enjoyment, or make your own since your such an expert at it.
Personally I'd love to thank Sean Bishop, Luke 28, and BadgerPhil for taking the time to not only come up with rankings, but actually giving them some reason behind it.
Personally I'd love to thank Sean Bishop, Luke 28, and BadgerPhil for taking the time to not only come up with rankings, but actually giving them some reason behind it.
cdat
offline
offline
Originally posted by mykel
I think the Monkey's are ranked too low......
If I may... bite me. Hell, bite us all.
I think the Monkey's are ranked too low......
If I may... bite me. Hell, bite us all.
Jason Elliott
offline
offline
Originally posted by dctitan49
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
Because you are 1-2 and they are 2-1, any formula out there would have you behind them. Heh, at least you're the top of the 1-2 teams.
?
if you did your homework, we are 1-2 and not 2-1 because we fumbled with a minute left running out the clock against the Nighthawks
but even with that, we beat the Sharks 43-20 just 2 days ago, common sense says we are a more powerful team then them ??
Not to mention we have had the hardest schedule thus far..
Your team wasn't good enough to hold onto the ball, the nighthawks shouldn't be punished for that, you guys should thus you are ranked lower.
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
Because you are 1-2 and they are 2-1, any formula out there would have you behind them. Heh, at least you're the top of the 1-2 teams.
?
if you did your homework, we are 1-2 and not 2-1 because we fumbled with a minute left running out the clock against the Nighthawks
but even with that, we beat the Sharks 43-20 just 2 days ago, common sense says we are a more powerful team then them ??
Not to mention we have had the hardest schedule thus far..
Your team wasn't good enough to hold onto the ball, the nighthawks shouldn't be punished for that, you guys should thus you are ranked lower.
Last edited Jun 18, 2008 06:27:25
bell 3id
offline
offline
Originally posted by dctitan49
Well normally when you Label something Power Rankings, you do it a certain way. I didn't know you were going to make up a system that fits your liking...
my bad
Why do you bitch about "SOMEONE DO POWER RANKINGS" but when someone takes the time to do it and you dont like where your ranked you bitch about it. Make your own power rankings then and rank yourself #1 if you want to be... don't give someone shit that took time out of their day to do this; ungreatful little ass bag.
Well normally when you Label something Power Rankings, you do it a certain way. I didn't know you were going to make up a system that fits your liking...
my bad
Why do you bitch about "SOMEONE DO POWER RANKINGS" but when someone takes the time to do it and you dont like where your ranked you bitch about it. Make your own power rankings then and rank yourself #1 if you want to be... don't give someone shit that took time out of their day to do this; ungreatful little ass bag.
Last edited Jun 18, 2008 08:34:25
dctitan49
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jason Elliott
Originally posted by dctitan49
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
Because you are 1-2 and they are 2-1, any formula out there would have you behind them. Heh, at least you're the top of the 1-2 teams.
?
if you did your homework, we are 1-2 and not 2-1 because we fumbled with a minute left running out the clock against the Nighthawks
but even with that, we beat the Sharks 43-20 just 2 days ago, common sense says we are a more powerful team then them ??
Not to mention we have had the hardest schedule thus far..
Your team wasn't good enough to hold onto the ball, the nighthawks shouldn't be punished for that, you guys should thus you are ranked lower.
i never said the nighthawks should be punished for that.
I said, we were 1 play from being 2-1
we beat the sharks by 23 points.
and yet he has us lower then them by a wide margin it seems like. i don't understand his rankings..
Originally posted by dctitan49
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
Because you are 1-2 and they are 2-1, any formula out there would have you behind them. Heh, at least you're the top of the 1-2 teams.
?
if you did your homework, we are 1-2 and not 2-1 because we fumbled with a minute left running out the clock against the Nighthawks
but even with that, we beat the Sharks 43-20 just 2 days ago, common sense says we are a more powerful team then them ??
Not to mention we have had the hardest schedule thus far..
Your team wasn't good enough to hold onto the ball, the nighthawks shouldn't be punished for that, you guys should thus you are ranked lower.
i never said the nighthawks should be punished for that.
I said, we were 1 play from being 2-1
we beat the sharks by 23 points.
and yet he has us lower then them by a wide margin it seems like. i don't understand his rankings..
bell 3id
offline
offline
Originally posted by bluur27
Man, some of you guys just can't wait for someone to post something so you can nip at them for whats wrong with it. All you freaking pansies were BEEEEEGGGGGGIIIIINNG for some east rankings. Now you got 2 people doing it, and you bitch and moan. Rankings are never perfect(See BCS) and even for them to have any actual validity, the season needs to be further along. So enjoy what is presented to you, for your enjoyment, or make your own since your such an expert at it.
Personally I'd love to thank Sean Bishop, Luke 28, and BadgerPhil for taking the time to not only come up with rankings, but actually giving them some reason behind it.
to mock what bluur said thank you to all that have taken the time to do these power rankings and reviews it makes things alot more interesting for us that appreciate it, and to those who bitch and moan about it go jump off a bridge or hang yourself from a ceiling fan...
Man, some of you guys just can't wait for someone to post something so you can nip at them for whats wrong with it. All you freaking pansies were BEEEEEGGGGGGIIIIINNG for some east rankings. Now you got 2 people doing it, and you bitch and moan. Rankings are never perfect(See BCS) and even for them to have any actual validity, the season needs to be further along. So enjoy what is presented to you, for your enjoyment, or make your own since your such an expert at it.
Personally I'd love to thank Sean Bishop, Luke 28, and BadgerPhil for taking the time to not only come up with rankings, but actually giving them some reason behind it.
to mock what bluur said thank you to all that have taken the time to do these power rankings and reviews it makes things alot more interesting for us that appreciate it, and to those who bitch and moan about it go jump off a bridge or hang yourself from a ceiling fan...
jwman92
offline
offline
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
Non-biased, by the numbers, rankings.
The formula uses wins, strength-of-schedule*, and point difference; with it weighted in that order.
*Yes, we all play basically the same schedule minus one game out of conference. SOS still gives us an idea of what team are better while they are bunched up at the beginning and through the middle of the season.
Without further ado, rankings as of Week 3:
Team Name: Power Ranking
-----------------------------------------
Eleven Wise Monkeys: 8.27
Bristol Bullets: 8.13
New York Warriors: 8.11
Alcatraz Island Jailbreakers: 5.51
Boston Massacre: 5.39
Dallas Rampage: 5.37
Louisville Nighthawks: 5.3
Cleveland Firebirds: 5.22
Miami Sharks: 5.16
New York Hope: 2.78
Baltimore Knights: 2.6
Syracuse Souls: 2.5
Colonial Zoners: -0.05
TCC's Wax-Bustin Warriors: -0.06
Hartford Musician: -0.1
Richmond Retros: -0.2
If strength of schedule is taken into account we should be in there!
We have played teams who are 8-1 combined this year!
Non-biased, by the numbers, rankings.
The formula uses wins, strength-of-schedule*, and point difference; with it weighted in that order.
*Yes, we all play basically the same schedule minus one game out of conference. SOS still gives us an idea of what team are better while they are bunched up at the beginning and through the middle of the season.
Without further ado, rankings as of Week 3:
Team Name: Power Ranking
-----------------------------------------
Eleven Wise Monkeys: 8.27
Bristol Bullets: 8.13
New York Warriors: 8.11
Alcatraz Island Jailbreakers: 5.51
Boston Massacre: 5.39
Dallas Rampage: 5.37
Louisville Nighthawks: 5.3
Cleveland Firebirds: 5.22
Miami Sharks: 5.16
New York Hope: 2.78
Baltimore Knights: 2.6
Syracuse Souls: 2.5
Colonial Zoners: -0.05
TCC's Wax-Bustin Warriors: -0.06
Hartford Musician: -0.1
Richmond Retros: -0.2
If strength of schedule is taken into account we should be in there!
We have played teams who are 8-1 combined this year!
bell 3id
offline
offline
Originally posted by jwman92
If strength of schedule is taken into account we should be in there!
We have played teams who are 8-1 combined this year!
OMFG guess what... its another East Team bitching about something they bitched for 2 weeks for and finally got it and dont like the outcome; go figure...
You are outscored 23-86 this year; you were shutout last game and your 0-3 you have nothing to bitch about your lucky your not at the bottom.
If strength of schedule is taken into account we should be in there!
We have played teams who are 8-1 combined this year!
OMFG guess what... its another East Team bitching about something they bitched for 2 weeks for and finally got it and dont like the outcome; go figure...
You are outscored 23-86 this year; you were shutout last game and your 0-3 you have nothing to bitch about your lucky your not at the bottom.
Last edited Jun 18, 2008 08:49:22
ortizhr13
offline
offline
If strength of schedule is taken into account we should be in there!
We have played teams who are 8-1 combined this year!
But if you don't actually beat any of them....
mykel
offline
offline
Originally posted by cdat
Originally posted by mykel
I think the Monkey's are ranked too low......
If I may... bite me. Hell, bite us all.
O cmon cdat! I have NEVER talked smack on these boards but thought it would be funny in this case since everyone is claming they are too low on the list!
Originally posted by ortizhr13
Originally posted by
If strength of schedule is taken into account we should be in there!
We have played teams who are 8-1 combined this year!
But if you don't actually beat any of them....
hehe - thats kinda funny
Originally posted by mykel
I think the Monkey's are ranked too low......
If I may... bite me. Hell, bite us all.
O cmon cdat! I have NEVER talked smack on these boards but thought it would be funny in this case since everyone is claming they are too low on the list!
Originally posted by ortizhr13
Originally posted by
If strength of schedule is taken into account we should be in there!
We have played teams who are 8-1 combined this year!
But if you don't actually beat any of them....
hehe - thats kinda funny
FriskyMonkey
offline
offline
Originally posted by dctitan49
i never said the nighthawks should be punished for that.
I said, we were 1 play from being 2-1
we beat the sharks by 23 points.
and yet he has us lower then them by a wide margin it seems like. i don't understand his rankings..
congrats! OKC was 1 play from being in USA A 1 - shit happens, you still lost and guess what, that will move you down in any ranking
just because you can't comprehend math doesn't mean its wrong, it just means you need to shut your mouth and enjoy the numbers someone has posted because you are too lazy to do it yourself.
he explained how he got his numbers in the original post, please if you come up with a flawless system to rank teams call me because i'll make a fortune selling it to every professional sport league because guess what...ALL the ranking systems are slightly flawed in one way or another
please do some power rankings and feel free to list yourself at #1 if thats what you really need to get through your day
Badger - like most i appreciate the rankings
please continue
i never said the nighthawks should be punished for that.
I said, we were 1 play from being 2-1
we beat the sharks by 23 points.
and yet he has us lower then them by a wide margin it seems like. i don't understand his rankings..
congrats! OKC was 1 play from being in USA A 1 - shit happens, you still lost and guess what, that will move you down in any ranking
just because you can't comprehend math doesn't mean its wrong, it just means you need to shut your mouth and enjoy the numbers someone has posted because you are too lazy to do it yourself.
he explained how he got his numbers in the original post, please if you come up with a flawless system to rank teams call me because i'll make a fortune selling it to every professional sport league because guess what...ALL the ranking systems are slightly flawed in one way or another
please do some power rankings and feel free to list yourself at #1 if thats what you really need to get through your day
Badger - like most i appreciate the rankings
please continueLast edited Jun 18, 2008 10:05:43
GeneralMills92
offline
offline
I think Power Rankings that have no opinions are safer, but i don't think they are ever very accurate. They almost always favor well rounded teams. (says the guy from Boston Massacre lol) Anyway, i would rather have several people post their OPINIONS rather than one guy just posting stats for two reasons: its more fun to discuss, and two, anyone can look at the stats, but that hardly ever states the best team.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
