Warrior General Games

Originally posted by GIEFFcia
Jeff Garcia was the first one to do this very long ago.

AKA, the best QB in GLB history

Not sure who Jeff Garcia (the GLB player) is, but couldn't find a build to reference. On an unrelated note, why are you banned?

jeff garcia was just a player from some gay agent that love to over hype his players. emphasis on gay, that guy was a rainbow through and thorugh

Im going to take throwing to 100, vision to 70 and strength to 56 by the time im done with my QB

Originally posted by jxwhee
I'm all for experiments, so will be interesting to see. QB to me so far has been one of those positions with little debate on what the first cap should be, and that's throwing.

I agree with ya as well...

I actually created a scrambler and capped his throwing 1st and Vision 2nd...

I'm about to cap his speed and agility as well at the 1st cap.
This will give me 1st cap+ on Thr,Vis,Sp and Ag...at lvl 13

Then I plan to take Speed and agility pretty far...

While I train stamina,strength and carry...
I probably should do the multi-train on those...we'll see.(specially with the new upgrades on those in the announcement)

maybe a 4-multi and add confidence in there..

Originally posted by -M-
Im going to take throwing to 100, vision to 70 and strength to 56 by the time im done with my QB

strength to 56 only?

Originally posted by -M-
Im going to take throwing to 100, vision to 70 and strength to 56 by the time im done with my QB

That guy's gonna throw INT after INT. He will never be able to throw a deep pass with accuracy with only 56 STR.

Get his STR to the 73, arguably the 77 cap.

Originally posted by -M-
Im going to take throwing to 100, vision to 70 and strength to 56 by the time im done with my QB

Not a good finishing spot at all. My QB has over 120 throwing and over 100 vision. Both should be at 77-82 with out EQ by Level 65.

Originally posted by Border Runners
strength to 56 only?

You can have a very successful QB without much strength. Strength isn't that important.

Throwing >>> Vision > Confidence >> Strength

Originally posted by megaman1337
You can have a very successful QB without much strength. Strength isn't that important.

Throwing >>> Vision > Confidence >> Strength

Oof.

Throwing >> Strength >>>>> Confidence >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vision

i'd be more interested in seeing a QB that doesnt take vision above 48

with all of this do you guys think a 140 throwing - 90 vision is better than a 130 throwing - 100 vision????

Originally posted by HULK
Originally posted by megaman1337

You can have a very successful QB without much strength. Strength isn't that important.

Throwing >>> Vision > Confidence >> Strength

Oof.

Throwing >> Strength >>>>> Confidence >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vision



If you want to build a very average deep passer, I say go for it.

Here are the results of the build I'm talking about:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player_awards.pl?player_id=1361513

League Leaders:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/league.pl?league_id=48

His WRs, TEs and RBs have been average to below average in pass catching ability too; yet no other QB has ever been able to touch his performances.

Results don't lie.

Originally posted by megaman1337
Results don't lie.

Not generally, but they also don't always tell the whole story. Just a quick peruse of the teams showed that your basis is skewed.

Your team was primarily a throwing team.

While the most of the other teams in your league were averaging ~60% rushing plays, your team was at ~55% Passing plays.

The ones that were higher in passing % seemingly had much lower quality O-lines & receivers. Dunno how yours were as bad as you claim.

Originally posted by OVERKILL
Originally posted by megaman1337

Results don't lie.

Not generally, but they also don't always tell the whole story. Just a quick peruse of the teams showed that your basis is skewed.

No offense, but wrong.


Originally posted by OVERKILL
Your team was primarily a throwing team.

While the most of the other teams in your league were averaging ~60% rushing plays, your team was at ~55% Passing plays.

You might want to ask yourself why the team chose the pass over the run.

Just a hint, the team I joined utilized a run based offense the season prior.



Originally posted by OVERKILL
The ones that were higher in passing % seemingly had much lower quality O-lines & receivers. Dunno how yours were as bad as you claim.

Because the entire offense was run based. The WRs were of a lower quality than the league average and the offensive line was built for the run.

your team is second in the conference for YAC. just curious, what is your definition of a low quality receiver?