User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Position Talk > QB Club > Anyone ever try a vision-based QB?
Page:
 
MF Adam Banks
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by GIEFFcia
Jeff Garcia was the first one to do this very long ago.

AKA, the best QB in GLB history


Not sure who Jeff Garcia (the GLB player) is, but couldn't find a build to reference. On an unrelated note, why are you banned?
 
gtthom86
offline
Link
 
jeff garcia was just a player from some gay agent that love to over hype his players. emphasis on gay, that guy was a rainbow through and thorugh
 
Uncle Si
offline
Link
 
Im going to take throwing to 100, vision to 70 and strength to 56 by the time im done with my QB
 
aceinthehouse
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jxwhee
I'm all for experiments, so will be interesting to see. QB to me so far has been one of those positions with little debate on what the first cap should be, and that's throwing.


I agree with ya as well...

I actually created a scrambler and capped his throwing 1st and Vision 2nd...

I'm about to cap his speed and agility as well at the 1st cap.
This will give me 1st cap+ on Thr,Vis,Sp and Ag...at lvl 13

Then I plan to take Speed and agility pretty far...

While I train stamina,strength and carry...
I probably should do the multi-train on those...we'll see.(specially with the new upgrades on those in the announcement)

maybe a 4-multi and add confidence in there..
 
Link
 
Originally posted by -M-
Im going to take throwing to 100, vision to 70 and strength to 56 by the time im done with my QB


strength to 56 only?
 
dviss1
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by -M-
Im going to take throwing to 100, vision to 70 and strength to 56 by the time im done with my QB


That guy's gonna throw INT after INT. He will never be able to throw a deep pass with accuracy with only 56 STR.

Get his STR to the 73, arguably the 77 cap.
 
Seleni
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by -M-
Im going to take throwing to 100, vision to 70 and strength to 56 by the time im done with my QB


Not a good finishing spot at all. My QB has over 120 throwing and over 100 vision. Both should be at 77-82 with out EQ by Level 65.
Edited by Seleni on Jun 8, 2010 14:06:53
 
megaman1337
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Border Runners
strength to 56 only?


You can have a very successful QB without much strength. Strength isn't that important.

Throwing >>> Vision > Confidence >> Strength
 
HULK
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by megaman1337
You can have a very successful QB without much strength. Strength isn't that important.

Throwing >>> Vision > Confidence >> Strength


Oof.

Throwing >> Strength >>>>> Confidence >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vision

 
monsterkill
offline
Link
 
i'd be more interested in seeing a QB that doesnt take vision above 48
 
joeyjojok
offline
Link
 
with all of this do you guys think a 140 throwing - 90 vision is better than a 130 throwing - 100 vision????
 
megaman1337
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by HULK
Originally posted by megaman1337

You can have a very successful QB without much strength. Strength isn't that important.

Throwing >>> Vision > Confidence >> Strength


Oof.

Throwing >> Strength >>>>> Confidence >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vision



If you want to build a very average deep passer, I say go for it.

Here are the results of the build I'm talking about:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player_awards.pl?player_id=1361513

League Leaders:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/league.pl?league_id=48

His WRs, TEs and RBs have been average to below average in pass catching ability too; yet no other QB has ever been able to touch his performances.

Results don't lie.
 
OVERKILL
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by megaman1337
Results don't lie.


Not generally, but they also don't always tell the whole story. Just a quick peruse of the teams showed that your basis is skewed.

Your team was primarily a throwing team.

While the most of the other teams in your league were averaging ~60% rushing plays, your team was at ~55% Passing plays.

The ones that were higher in passing % seemingly had much lower quality O-lines & receivers. Dunno how yours were as bad as you claim.
 
megaman1337
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by OVERKILL
Originally posted by megaman1337

Results don't lie.


Not generally, but they also don't always tell the whole story. Just a quick peruse of the teams showed that your basis is skewed.


No offense, but wrong.


Originally posted by OVERKILL
Your team was primarily a throwing team.

While the most of the other teams in your league were averaging ~60% rushing plays, your team was at ~55% Passing plays.


You might want to ask yourself why the team chose the pass over the run.

Just a hint, the team I joined utilized a run based offense the season prior.



Originally posted by OVERKILL
The ones that were higher in passing % seemingly had much lower quality O-lines & receivers. Dunno how yours were as bad as you claim.


Because the entire offense was run based. The WRs were of a lower quality than the league average and the offensive line was built for the run.
Edited by megaman1337 on Jun 19, 2010 17:18:28
 
monsterkill
offline
Link
 
your team is second in the conference for YAC. just curious, what is your definition of a low quality receiver?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.