Warrior General Games

Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
yes but they have lolstats like speed and agility... I'm talking an intense strength/carry build, maybe even some STR move SA.

You really are dumb. Try again. The long timers in Gold know how to build power backs.

Originally posted by juiceweezl
You really are dumb. Try again. The long timers in Gold know how to build power backs.

I wasn't talking building him to be a good HB... you are an ass...

I just meant if you were building him just to break tackles it wouldn't be that hard... didn't say you'd be gaining yards in the meantime...

gah at you guys all taking any chance you can to jump down my throat....

Originally posted by juiceweezl
Originally posted by EatDaBeaver

yes but they have lolstats like speed and agility... I'm talking an intense strength/carry build, maybe even some STR move SA.

You really are dumb. Try again. The long timers in Gold know how to build power backs.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/full_player_stats.pl?player_id=1997063&playoffs=0

This player was unboosted all season until last game.

125 rushes, 42 Broken Tackles. He hasn't double-capped anything, he hasn't put any points into SAs (but when he hit level 8 I bought him Powerback Custom EQ), and he hasn't invested a single point after the first cap.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/full_player_stats.pl?player_id=1896276&playoffs=0

This player had 76.3 Strength and 44 Carrying. He broke just as many tackles. Proving to you kiddos that you still need momentum to break tackles.

...in half as many carries. proving to you guys that clearly strength/carrying builds are better for just pure tackle breaking... and considering you could get a QB like at least 30-40 carries in a game, he'd have 50 broken tackles in NO time... I stand pretty strongly by that...

Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
I wasn't talking building him to be a good HB... you are an ass...

I just meant if you were building him just to break tackles it wouldn't be that hard... didn't say you'd be gaining yards in the meantime...

gah at you guys all taking any chance you can to jump down my throat....

It's because you are mean, if you were nicer people wouldn't hate you. You need a hug or an lolgm spot to either of my team just let me know. I actually feel bad for you and am concerned about your welfare.

Originally posted by Moogz
It's because you are mean, if you were nicer people wouldn't hate you. You need a hug or an lolgm spot to either of my team just let me know. I actually feel bad for you and am concerned about your welfare.

I need a hug













From your avatar

Megan Fox is pretty awesome. Even in a really lame modest pic, she is really beautiful and attractive. We need to clone her, and start raising little baby Megan Fox clones to help populate the world with sexy.

Originally posted by Moogz
Megan Fox is pretty awesome. Even in a really lame modest pic, she is really beautiful and attractive. We need to clone her, and start raising little baby Megan Fox clones to help populate the world with sexy.

I call 1st dibs

clearly i was very mean in these post

Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
42 Carries 3 BTKL.

Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
no... not really, if you wanted to make him to get Broken tackles, you could just QB sneak every play and max out his strength....

Hed have 50 in no time.

Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
yes but they have lolstats like speed and agility... I'm talking an intense strength/carry build, maybe even some STR move SA.

I answered the OP question, then his follow up question to the best of my ability... then I get flamed once again... about how "stupid" I am.

Stop justifying it... sick of getting jumped on for no reason...

Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
...in half as many carries. proving to you guys that clearly strength/carrying builds are better for just pure tackle breaking... and considering you could get a QB like at least 30-40 carries in a game, he'd have 50 broken tackles in NO time... I stand pretty strongly by that...

But you ignore the fact that last year I played three CPU teams in the West and that I boosted at level 5 to get to level 8 and give me Equipment early and CE Upgrade early.

Originally posted by Time Trial
But you ignore the fact that last year I played three CPU teams in the West and that I boosted at level 5 to get to level 8 and give me Equipment early and CE Upgrade early.

touche, but whos to say that you couldn't do that on the Rushing QB as well?

I'm not professing STR CAR builds to be good at all, just saying that given the build and being fed carries, that I feel a QB would have no problem breaking 50 tackles...

Originally posted by Robbnva
so a rushing QB getting over 50 would be pretty hard?

Against good competition, yes. Against a bunch of CPU teams in copper while also returning kicks...maybe not.

I take it your QB on the Phalanx is an experimental build? His 65 is impressive. I expected to see most of them in just a handful of games, but he's been getting them pretty consistently, with the only outlier the game where he had 16 of them, and a lot of those coming off a FS with an effective level of 7.

But to answer your question, yes...he's getting more than you usually see.

Originally posted by PING72
Originally posted by Robbnva

so a rushing QB getting over 50 would be pretty hard?

Against good competition, yes. Against a bunch of CPU teams in copper while also returning kicks...maybe not.

I take it your QB on the Phalanx is an experimental build? His 65 is impressive. I expected to see most of them in just a handful of games, but he's been getting them pretty consistently, with the only outlier the game where he had 16 of them, and a lot of those coming off a FS with an effective level of 7.

But to answer your question, yes...he's getting more than you usually see.

well i wasn't planning to call out my particular QB build but it was the idea behind the thread.

I am trying to get my team owner to challenge a gold team to see how he would do vs tough competition.

I'm always up for the scrim. Just know that most Gold teams have finished or almost finished boosting by now.

Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
clearly i was very mean in these post


you were mean in these posts :http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=3926757&page=12

Fucking go fly a fucking kite in a fucking thunderstorm you faggot ass people over at MN

Good job waiting till last second to boost your player just to make me lose my well earned #1 seed...

well I guess maybe I should have gameplanned... but maybe I would have had yall assholes not tried to be sneaky...

this isn't a god damn sneak-attack game its meant to be football.. go fuck yourselves and I'm not even mad about losing... because I could have gameplanned and won anyway...

I sure hope to end your boosting team's dreams in round 1 with my non boosting team

you azzholes


AND


No they are assholes, they had nothing to gain from winning this game, they couldn't possibly move up a seed, and they could only have lost a seed if they lost to both us and the wind, and they'll beat win by 100.

The point is this wasn't even a reasonable time to boost, essentially if he waits an extra 10 minutes to boost his players are level 13 right now rather than 12, as far as if he wanted to boost early for a tourney or something, thats fine, plus I'll know beforehand. But it seems they boosted, at possibly the cost of a level for some of there players, JUST to beat us, and that is bullshit and incomprehensible poor sportsmanship.

I doubt we'll make the finals as if I lose to that mid-level of a team just because they boosted a few players, now granted I didn't gameplan, but the AI in place was pretty solid... I think I'll likely be making my exit in the first round to some wannabe boosted team running a sweep every play IN HOPES my FS/SS/CBs would just stand in awe...

The point is MN is a bunch of cowardly assholes and I really really hope the Shocks beat WCC just so I can be responsible for this team exiting the playoffs.



It made me cry... http://makuluwo.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/crying_smiley_by_ajnosftw.jpg