Kickers added
jprietman
offline
offline
i think we can now just enjoy the fantasy numbers our players put up this year, and next offseason, we'll actually do a fantasy draft.
Alpha Stats now updated to include Game 2 stats.
(Still have to update WRs, will get to it tonight or tomorrow afternoon GMT)
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pC42ofCsspZ1oFHM6m2yXXA
(Still have to update WRs, will get to it tonight or tomorrow afternoon GMT)
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pC42ofCsspZ1oFHM6m2yXXA
CapnCrunch
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mike Rogers
Alpha Stats now updated to include Game 2 stats.
(Still have to update WRs, will get to it tonight or tomorrow afternoon GMT)
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pC42ofCsspZ1oFHM6m2yXXA
The QB formula is off...
Corey Smith 581 yards = 58.1 pts
3 td = 18 pts
7 int = -21
58.1 + 18 - 21 = 55.1 and it says 60.1
JJ Flicker
459 yards = 45.9
6 TD = 36
0 int
45.9 + 36 = 81.9 not 84.9
They are all off, I cant really see a pattern without looking at the formulas...
Alpha Stats now updated to include Game 2 stats.
(Still have to update WRs, will get to it tonight or tomorrow afternoon GMT)
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pC42ofCsspZ1oFHM6m2yXXA
The QB formula is off...
Corey Smith 581 yards = 58.1 pts
3 td = 18 pts
7 int = -21
58.1 + 18 - 21 = 55.1 and it says 60.1
JJ Flicker
459 yards = 45.9
6 TD = 36
0 int
45.9 + 36 = 81.9 not 84.9
They are all off, I cant really see a pattern without looking at the formulas...
coreyls18
offline
offline
They actually arent off. They have a bonus in the points based off of your Comp %
EDIT: Im going to take out the bonuses though. So they should be right now
EDIT: Im going to take out the bonuses though. So they should be right now
Last edited Jun 15, 2008 22:49:59
karrde45
offline
offline
Personally, I preferred the old O-line grading. Pancakes just show if you've played a bad opponent or not.
CapnCrunch
offline
offline
Ok, not busting your balls because I think you did a hell of a job and I do appreciate it, but 2 things..
there are some numbers bolded which I assume are the high's - the passing yardage high is 620 not 581
the totals just need to be sorted again
Again, nice job on this!
coreyls18
offline
offline
Originally posted by karrde45
Personally, I preferred the old O-line grading. Pancakes just show if you've played a bad opponent or not.
Does it really matter? We will all play the same opponents, so who cares to be honest. Eventually it will all even out.
Personally, I preferred the old O-line grading. Pancakes just show if you've played a bad opponent or not.
Does it really matter? We will all play the same opponents, so who cares to be honest. Eventually it will all even out.
jprietman
offline
offline
Well, obviously sacks and hurries should count as negative points for an o-line. That's really how o-lines are criticized anyway.
We had a bit of discussion about this, I dont like Pancakes being in there really, but it came down to there only being 2 stats for O-line. so we are trying to find something else to justify it.
I will probably play around with the point system on a few of the sheets throughout the season.
But for now just have to accept that its skewed until the last conference game...
Bolded scores were last game leaders idea was to do it for all categories, but its only ove person per conference doing this, so somethings just wont be done everytime.
I will probably play around with the point system on a few of the sheets throughout the season.
But for now just have to accept that its skewed until the last conference game...
Bolded scores were last game leaders idea was to do it for all categories, but its only ove person per conference doing this, so somethings just wont be done everytime.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























