Warrior General Games

No Centurions

Thanks Texan but you may have just killed the lionfish. by picking us to win man you have killed the yin and the yang.

Originally posted by Dujoman
Originally posted by fool

awesome read! thanks for the continued excellent work!

also appreciate you taking the time to make sure you got the upper & lowercase "g's" right!

i did this too

yeah but you ranked us 5th!

Originally posted by Polorl69
a few more games till the mystery nerf, usually happens around game 6

Ain't that the troofs.

Great job Texan!

Originally posted by Texan


Tibet (2-1) v SCSK (2-1)
SCSK started off nicely but got a reality check against Saigon. Tibet started off against potential Garuda champion Tet but has since righted the ship very impressively. One of these newcomers is not like the other. Look for Tibet to go GI Joe on SCSK and make them wish they'd stayed home and just played "Dungeons and Dragons". Tibet 42, SCSK 14.



I always was a big fan of G.I. Joe as a kid. Dungeons and Dragons, not so much. Although I did like making characters.......Some things never change.

I could be wrong, but I think Mekong is 1-2 instead of 0-3.

Also, I think we are going to lose by about 40-50.

We keep sounding the horn for reinforcements, but no one is coming.

Originally posted by Tony Dungy
I could be wrong, but I think Mekong is 1-2 instead of 0-3.

Also, I think we are going to lose by about 40-50.

We keep sounding the horn for reinforcements, but no one is coming.

I hate it when I'm right:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=1019731

Report Card

Current Record: 57-7
This Week's Record: 14-2 (both misses once again in garuda)
Grade v Spread (subjective): A-

Naga

NBA Jam (4-0) v St John Rumrunners (0-4)
Jam 90(83), Rumrunners 3(0) Correct.

Monks (4-0) v Mekong (1-3)
Monks 32(57), Mekong 20(6) Correct.

SLS (4-0) v HKH (1-3)
SLS 27(38), HKH 13(21) Correct.

Saigon (4-0) v Mutant Smurfs (2-2)
Saigon 57, Smurfs 7(0) Correct.

Tibet (3-1) v SCSK (2-2)
Tibet 42(41), SCSK 14(3) Correct.

PDP (2-2) v PPW (0-4)
PDP 85(207), PPW 10(7) Correct.

Bacolod (1-3) v Bali (1-3)
Bali 17(23), Bacolod 14(13) Correct.

Thai (2-2) v CMM (0-4)
Thai 42(64), CMM 33(45) Correct.

garuda

Bangalore (4-0) v Dharma (CPU)
Bangalore 255, Dharma 0 Correct.

Garudas (4-0) v BKK (2-2)
Garudas 38(100), BKK 17(3) Correct.

Tet (4-0) v Sweatshop (1-3)
Tet 31(62), Sweatshop 17(34) Correct.

LSP (4-0) v Ottawa (1-3)
LSP 35(76), Ottawa 20(14) Correct.

Lampang (3-1) v Lucid (2-2)
Lampang 23(20), Lucid 20(21) Incorrect.

Buffalo Rampage (3-1) v MMJ (0-4)
Buffalo 110, MMJ 10.

RSR (1-3) v Danang (2-2)
Danang 20, RSR 17(3) Correct.

Sydney (1-2) v Singapore (0-3)
Sydney 27(10), Singapore 20(27) Incorrect.

You.
Me.
Two plane tix to Vegas.
A suitcase full of seed money.

Let's make this happen! ...

Originally posted by Epark88
You.
Me.
Two plane tix to Vegas.
A suitcase full of seed money.

Let's make this happen! ...

Man, if I could get these %s on real sports that would be my new "job"...

right on the money. Can you pick college and pro games as well? If so, ever heard of a stakehorse?

Deja Vu

I'm almost certain I've seen that exact exchange before.

Amazing.

Yea pretty nice job so far sorry we had to F@#K it up for you