god so close to beating the express.
MikieSoSmooth
offline
offline
Originally posted by therichone
god so close to beating the express.
I was pulling for you guys. You were closer than I expected.
god so close to beating the express.
I was pulling for you guys. You were closer than I expected.
MikieSoSmooth
offline
offline
Hey Salizy, are you going to do week 2 predictions or do you want me too? Let me know here or in a PM.
Unconquered
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mikiesdaman
Hey Salizy, are you going to do week 2 predictions or do you want me too? Let me know here or in a PM.
One of the co-commissioners will be.
Hey Salizy, are you going to do week 2 predictions or do you want me too? Let me know here or in a PM.
One of the co-commissioners will be.
salizy13
offline
offline
hah no worries man. I'd love for you to pm me yours as sort of some competition then after each week I will put in our total win loss
MikieSoSmooth
offline
offline
Originally posted by salizy13
hah no worries man. I'd love for you to pm me yours as sort of some competition then after each week I will put in our total win loss
I don't know if Unconquered would approve of that or not. As a matter of fact, I think maybe the commissioners should lobby the Admins/mods and see if they couldn't get the ability to lock/delete threads. I don't know if the rest of us should be allowed to start new threads either. That should be left up to the "big" boys.
hah no worries man. I'd love for you to pm me yours as sort of some competition then after each week I will put in our total win loss
I don't know if Unconquered would approve of that or not. As a matter of fact, I think maybe the commissioners should lobby the Admins/mods and see if they couldn't get the ability to lock/delete threads. I don't know if the rest of us should be allowed to start new threads either. That should be left up to the "big" boys.
salizy13
offline
offline
Bearphin should probably handle that since he is in charge of the administrative stuff
if unconquered apporoves of him trying to get the 5 of us mod powers
if unconquered apporoves of him trying to get the 5 of us mod powers
MikieSoSmooth
offline
offline
I wish there were someway to convey sarcasm in these forums. I can already see this league government system turning into a Dictatorship. As soon as I saw where Unconquered said it was time for him to "take control" in the league commissioner thread, I knew this was headed down a road I wouldn't like.
Bearphin
offline
offline
Originally posted by salizy13
Bearphin should probably handle that since he is in charge of the administrative stuff
if unconquered apporoves of him trying to get the 5 of us mod powers
sure, I'd be willing to give it a shot and PM Bort. Not sure how effectively it would work though.
Bearphin should probably handle that since he is in charge of the administrative stuff
if unconquered apporoves of him trying to get the 5 of us mod powers
sure, I'd be willing to give it a shot and PM Bort. Not sure how effectively it would work though.
BullFrogOnNet
offline
offline
18 point difference in chemistry = 31 to 7 lose. I call BS on that since I watched the replays and saw that my D percent was pretty much spot on to the plays that occured. I would have expected closer inspite of thier 65 to our 48 chemistry. The lose isn't suprising to me but It was uncanny how they would get 3rd downs. Oh well...a game based on keeping your players together for the chemistry factor is gonna get old.
Unconquered
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mikiesdaman
I wish there were someway to convey sarcasm in these forums. I can already see this league government system turning into a Dictatorship. As soon as I saw where Unconquered said it was time for him to "take control" in the league commissioner thread, I knew this was headed down a road I wouldn't like.
I'm just blunt, how can I really take control? We're just roleplaying so really you could tell me off and what am I going to do, suspend you? lol
With the Mod powers I really don't think it'll happen. It could be considered a suggestion as a GLB Wide thing which I personally think this is a good idea and probably would be well accepted.
I wish there were someway to convey sarcasm in these forums. I can already see this league government system turning into a Dictatorship. As soon as I saw where Unconquered said it was time for him to "take control" in the league commissioner thread, I knew this was headed down a road I wouldn't like.
I'm just blunt, how can I really take control? We're just roleplaying so really you could tell me off and what am I going to do, suspend you? lol
With the Mod powers I really don't think it'll happen. It could be considered a suggestion as a GLB Wide thing which I personally think this is a good idea and probably would be well accepted.
gambrinus843
offline
offline
Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
18 point difference in chemistry = 31 to 7 lose. I call BS on that since I watched the replays and saw that my D percent was pretty much spot on to the plays that occured. I would have expected closer inspite of thier 65 to our 48 chemistry. The lose isn't suprising to me but It was uncanny how they would get 3rd downs. Oh well...a game based on keeping your players together for the chemistry factor is gonna get old.
well as long as teams dont have mass exoduses and bring in lets say 30 new players your chemistry should build at a rate that eventually we will all have 90+ chemistry with teams adding a key player here or there each year. NFL teams dont just diband and restock so why should the game be set up to allow that? and chemistry is only an 8% factor in the game, depth however allows for teams to sub in without much of a drop in productivity and playing out of position hurts your abilities as well.
18 point difference in chemistry = 31 to 7 lose. I call BS on that since I watched the replays and saw that my D percent was pretty much spot on to the plays that occured. I would have expected closer inspite of thier 65 to our 48 chemistry. The lose isn't suprising to me but It was uncanny how they would get 3rd downs. Oh well...a game based on keeping your players together for the chemistry factor is gonna get old.
well as long as teams dont have mass exoduses and bring in lets say 30 new players your chemistry should build at a rate that eventually we will all have 90+ chemistry with teams adding a key player here or there each year. NFL teams dont just diband and restock so why should the game be set up to allow that? and chemistry is only an 8% factor in the game, depth however allows for teams to sub in without much of a drop in productivity and playing out of position hurts your abilities as well.
BullFrogOnNet
offline
offline
Originally posted by gambrinus843
Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
18 point difference in chemistry = 31 to 7 lose. I call BS on that since I watched the replays and saw that my D percent was pretty much spot on to the plays that occured. I would have expected closer inspite of thier 65 to our 48 chemistry. The lose isn't suprising to me but It was uncanny how they would get 3rd downs. Oh well...a game based on keeping your players together for the chemistry factor is gonna get old.
well as long as teams dont have mass exoduses and bring in lets say 30 new players your chemistry should build at a rate that eventually we will all have 90+ chemistry with teams adding a key player here or there each year. NFL teams dont just diband and restock so why should the game be set up to allow that? and chemistry is only an 8% factor in the game, depth however allows for teams to sub in without much of a drop in productivity and playing out of position hurts your abilities as well.
Ya my team is fine on depth our D Line is a lil weak but they did fine against the run, only other hole is my back up LBers and they usually over achieve. The problem wasn't that really because I feel we kept the run under control. It was all the 3rd downs converted into coverage. I mean have of them were into double and triple covered players. For my offense to be so inept was laughable...I know you have great CBs but my gameplan was to work the middle of the field to my TE and run game which was stymied. It made no sense to get shut down like that. I am losing faith in the tactics....I think it is based more on them working when they are set to the extreme.
Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
18 point difference in chemistry = 31 to 7 lose. I call BS on that since I watched the replays and saw that my D percent was pretty much spot on to the plays that occured. I would have expected closer inspite of thier 65 to our 48 chemistry. The lose isn't suprising to me but It was uncanny how they would get 3rd downs. Oh well...a game based on keeping your players together for the chemistry factor is gonna get old.
well as long as teams dont have mass exoduses and bring in lets say 30 new players your chemistry should build at a rate that eventually we will all have 90+ chemistry with teams adding a key player here or there each year. NFL teams dont just diband and restock so why should the game be set up to allow that? and chemistry is only an 8% factor in the game, depth however allows for teams to sub in without much of a drop in productivity and playing out of position hurts your abilities as well.
Ya my team is fine on depth our D Line is a lil weak but they did fine against the run, only other hole is my back up LBers and they usually over achieve. The problem wasn't that really because I feel we kept the run under control. It was all the 3rd downs converted into coverage. I mean have of them were into double and triple covered players. For my offense to be so inept was laughable...I know you have great CBs but my gameplan was to work the middle of the field to my TE and run game which was stymied. It made no sense to get shut down like that. I am losing faith in the tactics....I think it is based more on them working when they are set to the extreme.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
