Delhomme hasn't played in weeks and doesn't look to this week.
Forum > Pro Leagues > WDIS - embarrassment of riches in above average WRs
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Originally posted by JohnnyDollar
Delhomme hasn't played in weeks and doesn't look to this week.
o rly? How's Steve looking with Moore or whoever it is they've been rolling with? I can't imagine it being worse.
Delhomme hasn't played in weeks and doesn't look to this week.
o rly? How's Steve looking with Moore or whoever it is they've been rolling with? I can't imagine it being worse.
phthalatemagic
offline
offline
Originally posted by Iceman16
CAR has a great matchup, but it's Delhomme.
As much as I've called the Skins pass D numbers out for being skewed they've started to back them up the past few weeks.
So I think I'd be going with Chad, although there's a real good chance that the Bengals could not be retarded and run all over the Chargers.
EDIT: Oh. Yeah Winfield makes that even uglier. And I mean, Walker's good. But CJ's better and has a better matchup.
Pretty sure it's Matt Moore not Delhomme playing for the Panthers, not that it matters. Carolina should invite fans to play QB for the rest of the year.
CAR has a great matchup, but it's Delhomme.
As much as I've called the Skins pass D numbers out for being skewed they've started to back them up the past few weeks.
So I think I'd be going with Chad, although there's a real good chance that the Bengals could not be retarded and run all over the Chargers.
EDIT: Oh. Yeah Winfield makes that even uglier. And I mean, Walker's good. But CJ's better and has a better matchup.
Pretty sure it's Matt Moore not Delhomme playing for the Panthers, not that it matters. Carolina should invite fans to play QB for the rest of the year.
phthalatemagic
offline
offline
Originally posted by Iceman16
o rly? How's Steve looking with Moore or whoever it is they've been rolling with? I can't imagine it being worse.
Yeah.. it's awful.
o rly? How's Steve looking with Moore or whoever it is they've been rolling with? I can't imagine it being worse.
Yeah.. it's awful.
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Originally posted by phthalatemagic
Originally posted by Iceman16
o rly? How's Steve looking with Moore or whoever it is they've been rolling with? I can't imagine it being worse.
Yeah.. it's awful.
Guess my choice still stands
Originally posted by Iceman16
o rly? How's Steve looking with Moore or whoever it is they've been rolling with? I can't imagine it being worse.
Yeah.. it's awful.
Guess my choice still stands

Originally posted by Iceman16
Originally posted by JohnnyDollar
Delhomme hasn't played in weeks and doesn't look to this week.
o rly? How's Steve looking with Moore or whoever it is they've been rolling with? I can't imagine it being worse.
meh, about the same. Maybe worse, they run a lot more now.
Originally posted by JohnnyDollar
Delhomme hasn't played in weeks and doesn't look to this week.
o rly? How's Steve looking with Moore or whoever it is they've been rolling with? I can't imagine it being worse.
meh, about the same. Maybe worse, they run a lot more now.
gtthom86
offline
offline
Wow, we have very similar WR cores. I'm benching MSW for sure, going to have to show me something after his recent slide + injury.
Right now I am starting jennings too - but he as been mediocre all year and he seems to be a lock for 4 catches for 40 yards or thereabouts. I'm debating starting Forte over him as my flex......who is dead equal in his mediocrity this season
Right now I am starting jennings too - but he as been mediocre all year and he seems to be a lock for 4 catches for 40 yards or thereabouts. I'm debating starting Forte over him as my flex......who is dead equal in his mediocrity this season
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Originally posted by JohnnyDollar
Originally posted by Iceman16
Originally posted by JohnnyDollar
Delhomme hasn't played in weeks and doesn't look to this week.
o rly? How's Steve looking with Moore or whoever it is they've been rolling with? I can't imagine it being worse.
meh, about the same. Maybe worse, they run a lot more now.
It's Wildcat time imo
Originally posted by Iceman16
Originally posted by JohnnyDollar
Delhomme hasn't played in weeks and doesn't look to this week.
o rly? How's Steve looking with Moore or whoever it is they've been rolling with? I can't imagine it being worse.
meh, about the same. Maybe worse, they run a lot more now.
It's Wildcat time imo
phthalatemagic
offline
offline
They should. RW made a good point in a recent interview - that the Dolphins started the Wildcat not because it's a superior style, but becasue they wanted to get the talent on the field. WIlliams/Stewart would be fun to watch.
r87
offline
offline
lol wtf is this shit
i have almost the exact same conundrum
fitz
jennings
harvin
sims walker
braylon
i have almost the exact same conundrum
fitz
jennings
harvin
sims walker
braylon
phthalatemagic
offline
offline
Originally posted by r87
lol wtf is this shit
i have almost the exact same conundrum
fitz
jennings
harvin
sims walker
braylon
Mom???
lol wtf is this shit
i have almost the exact same conundrum
fitz
jennings
harvin
sims walker
braylon
Mom???
n:iceman:16
offline
offline
Originally posted by phthalatemagic
They should. RW made a good point in a recent interview - that the Dolphins started the Wildcat not because it's a superior style, but becasue they wanted to get the talent on the field. WIlliams/Stewart would be fun to watch.
And I think those guys have a better chance of completing a screen to Steve Smith without it turning into a pick 6 than Delhomme. You'd have 3 guys that could score from the line of scrimmage on every touch.
They should. RW made a good point in a recent interview - that the Dolphins started the Wildcat not because it's a superior style, but becasue they wanted to get the talent on the field. WIlliams/Stewart would be fun to watch.
And I think those guys have a better chance of completing a screen to Steve Smith without it turning into a pick 6 than Delhomme. You'd have 3 guys that could score from the line of scrimmage on every touch.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























