lololol receivers silly
Forum > Pee Wee Leagues > Possession vs. Blocking WRs Season 13
vrecksler
offline
offline
Originally posted by jxgator33
lololol receivers silly
Well shit, I was just following the flow. The thread started out about WR's, then we started talking about QB's. And here I thought, wow, jx is really on his game thinking about blocking QB's because that is just crazy enough to work!
lololol receivers silly
Well shit, I was just following the flow. The thread started out about WR's, then we started talking about QB's. And here I thought, wow, jx is really on his game thinking about blocking QB's because that is just crazy enough to work!
jxgator33
offline
offline
Originally posted by vrecksler
Originally posted by jxgator33
lololol receivers silly
Well shit, I was just following the flow. The thread started out about WR's, then we started talking about QB's. And here I thought, wow, jx is really on his game thinking about blocking QB's because that is just crazy enough to work!
he could follow the RB's then make down field blocks
Originally posted by jxgator33
lololol receivers silly
Well shit, I was just following the flow. The thread started out about WR's, then we started talking about QB's. And here I thought, wow, jx is really on his game thinking about blocking QB's because that is just crazy enough to work!
he could follow the RB's then make down field blocks
Derek McFadden
offline
offline
With South Park we are running some of each. Haven't thought about next season yet, but will probably do something similar.
vladykins
offline
offline
Originally posted by jxgator33
Originally posted by vrecksler
Originally posted by jxgator33
lololol receivers silly
Well shit, I was just following the flow. The thread started out about WR's, then we started talking about QB's. And here I thought, wow, jx is really on his game thinking about blocking QB's because that is just crazy enough to work!
he could follow the RB's then make down field blocks
That's awesome- I'm making a 300 flex blocker next year!
Originally posted by vrecksler
Originally posted by jxgator33
lololol receivers silly
Well shit, I was just following the flow. The thread started out about WR's, then we started talking about QB's. And here I thought, wow, jx is really on his game thinking about blocking QB's because that is just crazy enough to work!
he could follow the RB's then make down field blocks
That's awesome- I'm making a 300 flex blocker next year!
gjwhite66
offline
offline
Originally posted by vladykins
That's awesome- I'm making a 300 flex blocker next year!
Well if you think about it, a blocking WR is still a 300 FP blocker
That's awesome- I'm making a 300 flex blocker next year!
Well if you think about it, a blocking WR is still a 300 FP blocker
vladykins
offline
offline
Originally posted by gjwhite66
Originally posted by vladykins
That's awesome- I'm making a 300 flex blocker next year!
Well if you think about it, a blocking WR is still a 300 FP blocker
No, that's a 300 flex CB tickler.
Originally posted by vladykins
That's awesome- I'm making a 300 flex blocker next year!
Well if you think about it, a blocking WR is still a 300 FP blocker
No, that's a 300 flex CB tickler.
vladykins
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
what is the OOP like if you used TEs as blocking WRs?
My understanding from the guide to building blocking WRs is that in tests, the TEs aren't as effective, so the OOP seems to be larger in regards to blocking.
what is the OOP like if you used TEs as blocking WRs?
My understanding from the guide to building blocking WRs is that in tests, the TEs aren't as effective, so the OOP seems to be larger in regards to blocking.
vladykins
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
you follow that guide o_O
It's worked for me so far and generally makes sense.
- Blocking >strength for blocking WRs, since pancaking your CB is not effective. Thus "tickling your CB".
- Too much blocking and your WR isn't gonna do much receivin'
- One blocking WR isn't very effective by himself.
- TEs aren't very effective as blocking WRs based on tests.
Other than that, there isn't much else to the "guide".
you follow that guide o_O
It's worked for me so far and generally makes sense.
- Blocking >strength for blocking WRs, since pancaking your CB is not effective. Thus "tickling your CB".
- Too much blocking and your WR isn't gonna do much receivin'
- One blocking WR isn't very effective by himself.
- TEs aren't very effective as blocking WRs based on tests.
Other than that, there isn't much else to the "guide".
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
