Wait a minute CV? You're talking about the guy who get's drunk every night holding our cash right??? lol
joemiken
offline
offline
Originally posted by kadafitcd
I don't know exactly how it will work on Run Hards Site.
I know I have always used these settings...
http://img232.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=ffsettings1.jpg
I'm calling the law on you for being on Pirate Bay.
I'm down for putting a little cash in. Not a ton, but a $10-15 fee would be fine.
Also wouldn't be against using RUN HARD's site, but I'd like to see how it's run and if I can access it and make roster moves via my Blackberry.
I don't know exactly how it will work on Run Hards Site.
I know I have always used these settings...
http://img232.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=ffsettings1.jpg
I'm calling the law on you for being on Pirate Bay.

I'm down for putting a little cash in. Not a ton, but a $10-15 fee would be fine.
Also wouldn't be against using RUN HARD's site, but I'd like to see how it's run and if I can access it and make roster moves via my Blackberry.
jktooley
offline
offline
Originally posted by kadafitcd
Sounds like a plan but I wouldn't want to make the entry too high. What would people want for the fee?
$10
$15
$20
$25
any...
And yes, I trust CV... He'd have to run from the site if he pocketed the moneyz, and you know that's not happening soon... lol
Sounds like a plan but I wouldn't want to make the entry too high. What would people want for the fee?
$10
$15
$20
$25
any...
And yes, I trust CV... He'd have to run from the site if he pocketed the moneyz, and you know that's not happening soon... lol
Jed
offline
offline
Originally posted by madet0rder
Originally posted by jktooley
I vote Yahoo... But i would still like it to be a pay league if possible... We would just need to choose 1 trustworthy manager to handle the funds (coachviking isn't going anywhere)... That way, we get a full payout of our entry fee, rather than some random site pocketing a bunch of cash.
+1 here.
Also +1 since I already use Yahoo for another league and so I'll get all the Plus stuff there for free
Also, I'm really not a fan of resetting waivers every week. If you sucked a dick, you now get rewarded with the new starting RB on a team who just lost their starter? I like a rolling waiver system much better.
Originally posted by jktooley
I vote Yahoo... But i would still like it to be a pay league if possible... We would just need to choose 1 trustworthy manager to handle the funds (coachviking isn't going anywhere)... That way, we get a full payout of our entry fee, rather than some random site pocketing a bunch of cash.
+1 here.
Also +1 since I already use Yahoo for another league and so I'll get all the Plus stuff there for free

Also, I'm really not a fan of resetting waivers every week. If you sucked a dick, you now get rewarded with the new starting RB on a team who just lost their starter? I like a rolling waiver system much better.
madet0rder
offline
offline
If I remember correctly, yahoo's default settings were pretty good. And no keeping a rolling waiver system is the best.
Galkuris
offline
offline
Originally posted by madet0rder
If I remember correctly, yahoo's default settings were pretty good. And no keeping a rolling waiver system is the best.
This too, I hate ESPN's way of doing it.
If I remember correctly, yahoo's default settings were pretty good. And no keeping a rolling waiver system is the best.
This too, I hate ESPN's way of doing it.
jktooley
offline
offline
I also dig Yahoo's settings... My only suggestion would be to make sure there's a decent yardage bonus... IMO it's retarded that a back can get 10 carries for 2 td's and 35 yards and get just as many points as a back that runs for 150 yards and 0 TDs...
Put rushing and receiving bonuses worth 6 pts at the 150 yard mark... and the same for passing over 375
Put rushing and receiving bonuses worth 6 pts at the 150 yard mark... and the same for passing over 375
Originally posted by jktooley
I also dig Yahoo's settings... My only suggestion would be to make sure there's a decent yardage bonus... IMO it's retarded that a back can get 10 carries for 2 td's and 35 yards and get just as many points as a back that runs for 150 yards and 0 TDs...
Put rushing and receiving bonuses worth 6 pts at the 150 yard mark... and the same for passing over 375
I hate bonuses like that since I have never been able to understand why 149 yards rushing should be worth six points less than 150 yards to use your example. Why not instead give the proper points per yard?
I also dig Yahoo's settings... My only suggestion would be to make sure there's a decent yardage bonus... IMO it's retarded that a back can get 10 carries for 2 td's and 35 yards and get just as many points as a back that runs for 150 yards and 0 TDs...
Put rushing and receiving bonuses worth 6 pts at the 150 yard mark... and the same for passing over 375
I hate bonuses like that since I have never been able to understand why 149 yards rushing should be worth six points less than 150 yards to use your example. Why not instead give the proper points per yard?
joemiken
offline
offline
Originally posted by cavalier
Originally posted by jktooley
I also dig Yahoo's settings... My only suggestion would be to make sure there's a decent yardage bonus... IMO it's retarded that a back can get 10 carries for 2 td's and 35 yards and get just as many points as a back that runs for 150 yards and 0 TDs...
Put rushing and receiving bonuses worth 6 pts at the 150 yard mark... and the same for passing over 375
I hate bonuses like that since I have never been able to understand why 149 yards rushing should be worth six points less than 150 yards to use your example. Why not instead give the proper points per yard?
I hate leagues that don't use fractional points. I'm down for whatever though. We can even do kick/punt return yardage so I can get an easy 10 points/game.
Originally posted by jktooley
I also dig Yahoo's settings... My only suggestion would be to make sure there's a decent yardage bonus... IMO it's retarded that a back can get 10 carries for 2 td's and 35 yards and get just as many points as a back that runs for 150 yards and 0 TDs...
Put rushing and receiving bonuses worth 6 pts at the 150 yard mark... and the same for passing over 375
I hate bonuses like that since I have never been able to understand why 149 yards rushing should be worth six points less than 150 yards to use your example. Why not instead give the proper points per yard?
I hate leagues that don't use fractional points. I'm down for whatever though. We can even do kick/punt return yardage so I can get an easy 10 points/game.

kadafitcd
offline
offline
Alright I edited my first posts. Votes are in. We are going to be using yahoo, and we are are going with the first 16 teams to join.
Bladnach
offline
offline
Originally posted by joemiken
Originally posted by cavalier
Originally posted by jktooley
I also dig Yahoo's settings... My only suggestion would be to make sure there's a decent yardage bonus... IMO it's retarded that a back can get 10 carries for 2 td's and 35 yards and get just as many points as a back that runs for 150 yards and 0 TDs...
Put rushing and receiving bonuses worth 6 pts at the 150 yard mark... and the same for passing over 375
I hate bonuses like that since I have never been able to understand why 149 yards rushing should be worth six points less than 150 yards to use your example. Why not instead give the proper points per yard?
I hate leagues that don't use fractional points. I'm down for whatever though. We can even do kick/punt return yardage so I can get an easy 10 points/game.
I still don't understand why some leagues don't use fractions when pretty much every league creator website allows them. The funny thing is, in the league i run with friends we still have a tie every other season (been doing it for about 10 years now). Ties with fractions are pretty crazy (to the hundredth place too!)
Originally posted by cavalier
Originally posted by jktooley
I also dig Yahoo's settings... My only suggestion would be to make sure there's a decent yardage bonus... IMO it's retarded that a back can get 10 carries for 2 td's and 35 yards and get just as many points as a back that runs for 150 yards and 0 TDs...
Put rushing and receiving bonuses worth 6 pts at the 150 yard mark... and the same for passing over 375
I hate bonuses like that since I have never been able to understand why 149 yards rushing should be worth six points less than 150 yards to use your example. Why not instead give the proper points per yard?
I hate leagues that don't use fractional points. I'm down for whatever though. We can even do kick/punt return yardage so I can get an easy 10 points/game.

I still don't understand why some leagues don't use fractions when pretty much every league creator website allows them. The funny thing is, in the league i run with friends we still have a tie every other season (been doing it for about 10 years now). Ties with fractions are pretty crazy (to the hundredth place too!)
kadafitcd
offline
offline
Thoughts as far as money goes third place doubles their money second place 4x and the Winner takes the rest....
$10 buy in = $160 > Winner $100 - Second $40 - Third $20
Or we could go third place wins their money back second place doubles and winner takes home the rest.(More reward for winning)
$10 buy in = $160 > Winner $130 - Second $20 - Third $10
Or we could do winner takes all. Your choice.
$10 buy in = $160 > Winner $100 - Second $40 - Third $20
Or we could go third place wins their money back second place doubles and winner takes home the rest.(More reward for winning)
$10 buy in = $160 > Winner $130 - Second $20 - Third $10
Or we could do winner takes all. Your choice.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.




























