aha! i just didn't really understand how you were ranking us. You took our passing game and rushing game and ranked us out of 32. then you did the same with defense. Thats 4s categories, then you take our average points scored and points allowed and add them all together and divide by 6

.
This is actually a pretty ingenious system, but your right that it is flawed. But i can't think of a way to rank teams without using statistics.
Take for example the fact that the Boston Massacre have the 4rth best passing game, and 10th bets running game. We can pretty much do what we want against most defenses. We can exploit almost any weakness they have defensivly.
But if you take our defense, we are absolutely awful. But the thing is, a team can only score so much in a certain amount of time. So it doesn't matter if our defense is the 25th worst in the league, or the 20th worst, The opposing team isn't likely to score THAT much more points just because we miss 4 more tackles and don't get an INT.
But that difference in the average is huge. This system will reward teams that are more well rounded, and well rounded teams generally win, but not always. With us it turns into a scoring route, which we won 9 16 times.
Idk if there is a way to factor in offensive and defensive plays per game? That could effect the average significatly. And it reflects how dominant your team is at controlling the ball offensivly, and how good the defense is at forcing those quick 3 and outs.
This might also be flawed though, but if it is i can't see one? If you do please let me know. Otherwise i can take the stats accumlated by Rhuin, and add in the O-plays/g and D-plays/g to it somehow.