Warrior General Games

I think Dugan definitely needs some recognition though his average per carry is so high even with him over 200 carries, he's leading the conference in scores and has some dual threat ability too

It was tough to pick some between some of the marquee positions theres a lot of talent out there. Yea defense would be interesting, we might need some help tho, or even just suggestions, its so hard to just wade through list without their being any mention of players positions in the stats page.

Originally posted by BerkeyTerps
I think Dugan definitely needs some recognition though his average per carry is so high even with him over 200 carries, he's leading the conference in scores and has some dual threat ability too

It was tough to pick some between some of the marquee positions theres a lot of talent out there. Yea defense would be interesting, we might need some help tho, or even just suggestions, its so hard to just wade through list without their being any mention of players positions in the stats page.

Yeah, defense is hard to do because you really have to watch replays more than judge statistics, since worse defenses generally garner more stats (well, more often anyways).

I think we should just start Slowpoke at all defensive positions and call it a rap.

lol works for me

I think McGee has got to be #1 C... he played 400 less plays and had 9 fewer pancakes... just sayin'

thats a good point, i saw that after we posted it up

I think we should do a defensive team. It's a great way to thank the players. How about we break it into: DE, DT, OLB, MLB, CB, FS, SS. And 1 rep from 2 teams take on each of the positions. If there are less than 14 teams that want to participate then we can combine LBs, if there are more than we can have 3 team participants for a couple positions.

I don't think there will be a ton of film involved... D-Line stats are pretty accurate. For CBs, you've got PDs, you've got INTs and I would look at starting CBs that had the least number of tackles in consideration of the other stats. Etc., etc. bottom line is that taking on one position isn't a huge burden. I'm willing to do it to honor the players. If there's interest elsewhere, let's do it.

I've already looked into potential choices for a defensive roster, but gameplanning for Chicago means that'll take a backseat for the time being.

Man My team feels so left out in the pro bowl I guess we're good as a team and ok as indiviuals

Oh look, a member of the Philly Watersnakes happened not to include a Washington Capital, i am so surprised!

He said watersnakes....he's so clever

Originally posted by Prince Darius
Oh look, a member of the Philly Watersnakes happened not to include a Washington Capital, i am so surprised!

Maybe it's because the 11-5 Capitals (no offense to anyone on the Caps, except for PD), didn't have stand out players compared to some of the other teams. Have you ever thought of that?

And why the watersnakes all of a sudden? Did you get to play with somebody's trouser snake in the bathtub again?

Originally posted by tuocekim
Originally posted by Prince Darius

Oh look, a member of the Philly Watersnakes happened not to include a Washington Capital, i am so surprised!

Maybe it's because the 11-5 Capitals (no offense to anyone on the Caps, except for PD), didn't have stand out players compared to some of the other teams. Have you ever thought of that?

And why the watersnakes all of a sudden? Did you get to play with somebody's trouser snake in the bathtub again?

I agree we didn't really have any stand out players but that is due to the fact we started the season as all lvls 1-3. We spent most of the season splitting time between 2-3 players at every position. Just within the last 3 games of the season we've found our best starting lign up. I'm not going to say we are the best team in BBB #4 but we are one of the deepest.

We also started with lvl 1-3 players... Well, 1-4 I guess since some boosted. We also have at least 2 people per position, with a high sub rate. Definitely good depth to our team, but I credit our wins more to our coordinators than to individual players

Originally posted by Prince Darius
Oh look, a member of the Philly Watersnakes happened not to include a Washington Capital, i am so surprised!

Oh no, you got me there...Seriously dude, just shut the fuck up because you're really pissing me off and I'm tired of listening to you bitch in every damn thread on here.

We made decisions based on stats and we obviously gave different stats different weight. If you really have a problem make your own roster and post it up, I'm sure it would be worth a laugh or two.

hey we went based on the stats, and those players were the most productive or efficient at their positions not our fault washington lowercases that you didn't have any really league high standouts, we weren't trying to exclude anyone, we just picked the players then we got the teams last, how it fell was how it fell.

obviously your too dumb to read how we said make some suggestions, we're looking for input