Warrior General Games

I understand Sully's concern

Originally posted by DFM

Fort worth, you know the team that added 7 level 13+ players at the deadline and still only managed to beat us by 4 points.


Go go Chocolate city!

...but when you said that you crossed into the realm of being a sore loser

Originally posted by oklandr8rs2000
I didn't gut the team.. they were tired of being on a team with a dead beat owner and wanted off.. when the new owner took over he promised everyone could leave if they chose to.. players asked about it and here they are..

last I heard the point of the game was to get better by adding players while staying with in the rules... here is what your statment sounded like to me-
Originally posted by sully


I wonder how the game would've gone had Welker and Moss stayed in Miami and Oakland instead of being shipped out and sent over to New England.

Hmm... Speculation! :O

sure Oakland and Miami wern't "gutted" but neither got anything out of the trades while NE came out on top..


Would the deadbeat owner happen to own two of the players that got traded at the deadline to your team? And does he know that you think he's a deadbeat?

This thread is getting out of line. Week 15 is over Sully did a hell of a job making mostly correct picks.

OaklandR8ders guy, please just don't respond to them you're not gonna change their opinion.

Originally posted by jcarm22
Originally posted by oklandr8rs2000

I didn't gut the team.. they were tired of being on a team with a dead beat owner and wanted off.. when the new owner took over he promised everyone could leave if they chose to.. players asked about it and here they are..

last I heard the point of the game was to get better by adding players while staying with in the rules... here is what your statment sounded like to me-
Originally posted by sully



I wonder how the game would've gone had Welker and Moss stayed in Miami and Oakland instead of being shipped out and sent over to New England.

Hmm... Speculation! :O

sure Oakland and Miami wern't "gutted" but neither got anything out of the trades while NE came out on top..


Would the deadbeat owner happen to own two of the players that got traded at the deadline to your team? And does he know that you think he's a deadbeat?


nope... thats the new owner of the team... he got it in week 10 or 11

Originally posted by oklandr8rs2000
Originally posted by jcarm22

Originally posted by oklandr8rs2000


I didn't gut the team.. they were tired of being on a team with a dead beat owner and wanted off.. when the new owner took over he promised everyone could leave if they chose to.. players asked about it and here they are..

last I heard the point of the game was to get better by adding players while staying with in the rules... here is what your statment sounded like to me-
Originally posted by sully




I wonder how the game would've gone had Welker and Moss stayed in Miami and Oakland instead of being shipped out and sent over to New England.

Hmm... Speculation! :O

sure Oakland and Miami wern't "gutted" but neither got anything out of the trades while NE came out on top..


Would the deadbeat owner happen to own two of the players that got traded at the deadline to your team? And does he know that you think he's a deadbeat?


nope... thats the new owner of the team... he got it in week 10 or 11
Which would be 2 weeks before you got the other guys. Don't see how this isn't fishy, that a guy trying to rebuild a team he bought would send his highest leveled player elsewhere.

Certainly his prerogative, but doesn't make sense to me.

Who cares? You're not gonna change anything. It's not against the rules officially.

Originally posted by jcarm22
Originally posted by oklandr8rs2000

Originally posted by jcarm22


Originally posted by oklandr8rs2000



I didn't gut the team.. they were tired of being on a team with a dead beat owner and wanted off.. when the new owner took over he promised everyone could leave if they chose to.. players asked about it and here they are..

last I heard the point of the game was to get better by adding players while staying with in the rules... here is what your statment sounded like to me-
Originally posted by sully





I wonder how the game would've gone had Welker and Moss stayed in Miami and Oakland instead of being shipped out and sent over to New England.

Hmm... Speculation! :O

sure Oakland and Miami wern't "gutted" but neither got anything out of the trades while NE came out on top..


Would the deadbeat owner happen to own two of the players that got traded at the deadline to your team? And does he know that you think he's a deadbeat?


nope... thats the new owner of the team... he got it in week 10 or 11
Which would be 2 weeks before you got the other guys. Don't see how this isn't fishy, that a guy trying to rebuild a team he bought would send his highest leveled player elsewhere.

Certainly his prerogative, but doesn't make sense to me.


take it up with him

Originally posted by oklandr8rs2000
I understand Sully's concern

Originally posted by DFM


Fort worth, you know the team that added 7 level 13+ players at the deadline and still only managed to beat us by 4 points.


Go go Chocolate city!

...but when you said that you crossed into the realm of being a sore loser

/violin

Your damned right im sore about losing that way.

Say we got smoked with your original roster by 50 poitns, i wouldn't have a problem with it.

Originally posted by DFM
Originally posted by oklandr8rs2000

I understand Sully's concern

Originally posted by DFM



Fort worth, you know the team that added 7 level 13+ players at the deadline and still only managed to beat us by 4 points.


Go go Chocolate city!

...but when you said that you crossed into the realm of being a sore loser

/violin

Your damned right im sore about losing that way.

Say we got smoked with your original roster by 50 poitns, i wouldn't have a problem with it.



..im guessing that violin was for you..you are the one whining
if your team is filled with dousche bags like you, then I am glad we won...

Originally posted by sully
Originally posted by gogoaggro

Sully what was that one wrong prediction again?

That's funny right there. I wonder how the game would've gone had you and 6 of your buddies stayed on Queen City in the A league instead of being gutted out and sent over to Fort Worth.

Hmm... Speculation! :O
So... we were traded over and I'm not sure what your point is. And we never were on Queen city.

Trades were made, a team improved there is nothing wrong with that.

Originally posted by gogoaggro
So... we were traded over and I'm not sure what your point is. And we never were on Queen city.

Then you might want to check your game logs. Looks like you played the first 3/4 of the season with them, along with about 6 other guys that were part of a mass migration to Fort Worth right at the trade deadline.

Originally posted by gogoaggro
Originally posted by sully

Originally posted by gogoaggro


Sully what was that one wrong prediction again?

That's funny right there. I wonder how the game would've gone had you and 6 of your buddies stayed on Queen City in the A league instead of being gutted out and sent over to Fort Worth.

Hmm... Speculation! :O
So... we were traded over and I'm not sure what your point is. And we never were on Queen city.

Trades were made, a team improved there is nothing wrong with that.

Damn. . .with all those ringers, you should have won by about 40, don't you think?

Originally posted by TheGonz

Damn. . .with all those ringers, you should have won by about 40, don't you think?

Jesus Christ... drop this shit
no, we wouldn't have won by 40 points... much like how yall beat the Dirtybirds

Your avergage starters level - 12
Our average starter level - 12.7
Atlanta's average starter level - 13.4
Actually, if we were going by just players levels alone, then since yall beat Atlanta yall should have stomped us.. but game plan is worth alot more than you are giving us credit for..

yall are a very well ran team and ran with a 6 game win streak that was very impressive... we just got the upper hand this game here no big deal..

Your adding 7 guys that we have no scouting report on and that you know intimately from GMing Queen City surely wouldn't affect our ability to gameplan for you, I'm sure...

Originally posted by jcarm22
Your adding 7 guys that we have no scouting report on and that you know intimately from GMing Queen City surely wouldn't affect our ability to gameplan for you, I'm sure...

welp, I would say this is about over... that is a reach if I have ever seen one

5 of those players we have had for 3 games, and 2 of them were FAs