Warrior General Games

Just a few of my guys created in season 1 and been in WEPL every season almost

Corey Smith - QB
Deion Smith - CB
Lock Smith - CB
Blake Smith - WR (was amazing in early seasons of WEPL. Since having more WRs around him though ive limited his numbers, still a great target)

Originally posted by coreyls18
Originally posted by korranus

How can you all forget Magnus Samuelsson

yeah but he dominated AAA, since here in WEPL he hasnt been as good as JJ. JJ is the only DE i think worthy

As far as when he was in AAA, I've never seen a DE more dominant...but after going back to look, at all of his seasons up here, his best season statistically isn't really any better than the one Heywood Jablomi just finished up with this season.

Originally posted by 9873101
Originally posted by coreyls18

Originally posted by korranus


How can you all forget Magnus Samuelsson

yeah but he dominated AAA, since here in WEPL he hasnt been as good as JJ. JJ is the only DE i think worthy

As far as when he was in AAA, I've never seen a DE more dominant...but after going back to look, at all of his seasons up here, his best season statistically isn't really any better than the one Heywood Jablomi just finished up with this season.

id take this guy over him anyday
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=38671

DT - http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=105666
Only his 1st season in WEPL and his last unfortunately. But he even did very well in USA Pro.

Originally posted by coreyls18
Originally posted by korranus

How can you all forget Magnus Samuelsson

yeah but he dominated AAA, since here in WEPL he hasnt been as good as JJ. JJ is the only DE i think worthy

JJ definitely has him beat since Bort rewards his style of build more than others, but magnus was 2nd in wepl in sacks in our first season here, the last non-fucked DE season.

As far as this year's stats, who cares, watch our games and see how many times our DE's are in coverage or we're just rushing 3 and forcing quick throws. Same reason Sienna's stats are down this season. Only thing I care about is that we allowed 5.3 YPA against as a team despite having one of the lowest leveled secondaries here and still finished with the second ranked rush D.

Why do u always talk about having the lowest level guys....your about avg. You guys have low levels on the team but they dont start and play near as much. I didnt go through those plays, but i assume they only play STs.
Here are the levels
DBs
56
50
33 - 14 plays per game
59
45
58
57
54
54
51
47
33 - 13 plays per game
DT
33 - 13.3 plays per game

rest of the defense is all like 53+ SO thats not an excuse anymore. Just say, "We have a good defense" leave the levels out of it.

nm u already posted what I posted

The extremely low leveled guys (basically our owners dudes) only play ST. But I mean look at Paris' roster compared to ours. You guys have 6 safeties who are 53+, we have 2. You also have 6 CB's who are 53+ on defense, we have 3 (jason doesn't play defense). Writing that off as nothing doesn't really make a whole lotta sense to me. That's a big difference.

But what I was talking about was scheme really. Like our singleback defenses for the vast majority of the season had about 30% of our snaps there with both DE's dropping into coverage. I'd say 35-45% of our snaps against 2 wide had the DE's in a position to better stop screens, not rush the passer.

Originally posted by Menamino
The extremely low leveled guys (basically our owners dudes) only play ST. But I mean look at Paris' roster compared to ours. You guys have 6 safeties who are 53+, we have 2. You also have 6 CB's who are 53+ on defense, we have 3 (jason doesn't play defense). Writing that off as nothing doesn't really make a whole lotta sense to me. That's a big difference.

But what I was talking about was scheme really. Like our singleback defenses for the vast majority of the season had about 30% of our snaps there with both DE's dropping into coverage. I'd say 35-45% of our snaps against 2 wide had the DE's in a position to better stop screens, not rush the passer.

That actually only makes sense based on what I assume are DE's built very heavily on Speed and agility at the cost of strenth. If you lined them up head to head with OT's and Guards at this level they would just be pancaked and out of the play anyway. Sounds like a good game plan based upon the strenths and weaknesses of the talent on your roster...you guys obviously are doing something right, your record in the pros is proof of that. But my point is, you drop DE's out do to the fact that you almost have to as opposed to the fact that you can.

If he's dropping his DEs because his personnel dictates that he "has to," that's more a sign of good DCing than anything else. Berlin does have good tactics in general, but that does not necessarily have to follow from having a lower level roster. There's no doubt that Berlin is a top-5 team in WEPL in terms of talent, and most of their success is due to that.

For the record, WWW has even lower levels than Berlin:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/team_stats.pl?league_id=9&conference_id=0&stat=passing&sort=passing_yards_allowed&playoffs=0
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team_stats.pl?league_id=9&conference_id=0&stat=rushing&sort=rushing_yards_allowed&playoffs=0

We almost never talk about our levels though... when we do it's usually because someone makes fun of us for it. (We also do the ST player thing).

Originally posted by sarcasticsleuth
If he's dropping his DEs because his personnel dictates that he "has to," that's more a sign of good DCing than anything else. Berlin does have good tactics in general, but that does not necessarily have to follow from having a lower level roster. There's no doubt that Berlin is a top-5 team in WEPL in terms of talent, and most of their success is due to that.

For the record, WWW has even lower levels than Berlin:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/team_stats.pl?league_id=9&conference_id=0&stat=passing&sort=passing_yards_allowed&playoffs=0
http://goallineblitz.com/game/team_stats.pl?league_id=9&conference_id=0&stat=rushing&sort=rushing_yards_allowed&playoffs=0

We almost never talk about our levels though... when we do it's usually because someone makes fun of us for it. (We also do the ST player thing).

Youre in alpha. Alpha offenses are much worse than Zeta offenses imo.

Originally posted by Menamino
The extremely low leveled guys (basically our owners dudes) only play ST. But I mean look at Paris' roster compared to ours. You guys have 6 safeties who are 53+, we have 2. You also have 6 CB's who are 53+ on defense, we have 3 (jason doesn't play defense). Writing that off as nothing doesn't really make a whole lotta sense to me. That's a big difference.

But what I was talking about was scheme really. Like our singleback defenses for the vast majority of the season had about 30% of our snaps there with both DE's dropping into coverage. I'd say 35-45% of our snaps against 2 wide had the DE's in a position to better stop screens, not rush the passer.

if u saw our CBs builds u wouldnt think we had the advantage. They are rough. And of them is sctrictly a KR/PR, not on the DC as a CB

Hard to tell Alpha v. Zeta; maybe your defenses just suck, it's hard to tell.

It's stupid that they have the interconference at the start of the season now, when everyone's feeling out the sim. This kind of trash talk would be a lot more relevant if it were game 16 like it used to be.

Originally posted by sarcasticsleuth
Hard to tell Alpha v. Zeta; maybe your defenses just suck, it's hard to tell.

It's stupid that they have the interconference at the start of the season now, when everyone's feeling out the sim. This kind of trash talk would be a lot more relevant if it were game 16 like it used to be.

yup but its a guarantee if you were to play the musketeers you wouldnt hold the offense under 400 yards and you would lose the game.

Originally posted by sarcasticsleuth
It's stupid that they have the interconference at the start of the season now, when everyone's feeling out the sim. This kind of trash talk would be a lot more relevant if it were game 16 like it used to be.

+1