User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Position Talk > D Line Club > What tactic is best for getting sacks?
Page:
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Dudly
I don't buy the "slow DEs are beating the system," argument. It's stupid, the DEs getting to the QB are the ones with the agl to break a block and the spd to finish the play. This is "football" not a race, slow sucks and there is no steady.

I do believe that Olinemen should get their spd up to engaged a blk quicker but I don't post that on their site.

misled was answering the question that started the thread, calm down.


Calm down, you should be telling that to the people calling others stupid. You don't have to buy into the "slow DEs are beating the system" argument because that's not what I'm saying. My DE isn't slow. My DT isn't as fast as everyone else who is an "expert" without a dominant DT. I just choose different tactics that work against the players I'm going up against. If you think setting yourself to pass and leaving it there all season is the best thing for you, that's cool, but that doesn't mean it is the best thing for you every game. Misled's answer is just that, misled.
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
wow that's clever. Never heard that line before. He wanted to get sacks... not tackles. You can only get sacks on passing plays (in this game anyways) so noticing a pass play is a pass play as soon as possible will mean a higher chance of getting a sack. I can show you how a DE plays a pass play and a run play differently if you want... especially if the run is a strongside rush. These are from the last game played since I'm too lazy to look up other plays that better exemplify this:

Here's a strongside rush:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=523470&pbp_id=17750279

Here's a pass rush:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=523470&pbp_id=17751694

As you can see noticing the difference between these two plays early on can be the difference from attacking the QB to in this case hurry the throw or do nothing because you hesitate and back off in case of a rush. And my DE exclusively plays weakside DE.

 
Link
 
Originally posted by misled
wow that's clever. Never heard that line before. He wanted to get sacks... not tackles. You can only get sacks on passing plays (in this game anyways) so noticing a pass play is a pass play as soon as possible will mean a higher chance of getting a sack. I can show you how a DE plays a pass play and a run play differently if you want... especially if the run is a strongside rush. These are from the last game played since I'm too lazy to look up other plays that better exemplify this:

Here's a strongside rush:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=523470&pbp_id=17750279

Here's a pass rush:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=523470&pbp_id=17751694

As you can see noticing the difference between these two plays early on can be the difference from attacking the QB to in this case hurry the throw or do nothing because you hesitate and back off in case of a rush. And my DE exclusively plays weakside DE.



Well, maybe you wouldn't hear that comment as often if you'd go deeper into a discussion and hear others opinions and stop giving advice with such certainty. Sorry, but it comes across as a little arrogant and immature. That's one of the reasons Underdogs gets so much shit on these forums. I also apologize for the play on words in your screen name. Feel free to pull the same card on me since my screen name is a bit ironic as well. I get that whenever I state my opinion. Anyway, I'm not arguing that you don't get off the line faster focusing on pass rush. Yes, sometimes it gets you sacks, but I'm saying it's not always the best way.

One other thing, I'm not saying you'll get sacks on running plays. I don't know where you're getting that from, but forget it - it has no place in this discussion. We're talking about getting sacks. So let's just kill that strawman argument right here and talk about getting to the QB on pass plays.

My stance is simple. I'm saying you can get sacks on passing plays with your tactics set to balanced and run focus. I'm also saying that sometimes getting off the line slower is more beneficial in certain matchups than using pass focus. It helps you against the run AND against the pass in those games. I don't pretend to know everything about how the O-line/D-line interaction works, but from my experience playing this game and watching a lot of replays at the higher level, I can tell you solely focusing on the pass isn't always the best way to go. Hear me out why I think that.

First, Bort has already said that he thinks the Oline's blocking angle's/vector/radius (whatever you want to call it) is probably too big. He is guessing that's why DEs might not be as effective as they used to be. He changed something after seasons 6 and DEs have been bitching ever since about not getting sacks. So, OTs have a big advantage in the space required to get around them.

Second, I think one of the reasons a lot of speed/agility guys are struggling to get sacks is probably because they use pass focus solely with a quick build. Don't get me wrong, if you're not a fast DE, run focus isn't going to even the playing field against the guard because you're too slow to get around him without contact anyway. But as a speed DE, if your fast and strong enough to get one stun, the extra tick or two delay in getting off the line on run focus, as opposed to pass focus, doesn't seem to matter as much. Sometimes it actually helps because the guard drops back, in effect giving you more room to avoid his blocking (let's call it) range. What I think is very material in getting QB sacks is the 3-7 ticks that you waste getting held by the O-line when you jump into their blocking range. That's what I try to avoid every game. If I think I can do it with speed, then I go pass. But if I expect to have to break a lot of blocks, I'd rather avoid the penalty to reading run plays, or both types of plays.

An example of my DE avoiding an OT entirely while on run focus.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=526903&pbp_id=10128315

In addition to the blocking range/holding advantage, the strength buff last season made it even harder for DEs. Most DEs don't have enough strength to get free from those blocks often enough to get sacks, which is one of the reasons the Stun effect was added - to help out the DEs who did have decent strength but still couldn't get around that huge blocking range the o-line has.

Basically, if you are trying to tell me that my DT/DE would have had more sacks this season if I had him set to pass focus all season, I'm going to difffer with you on that. In the old sim, yes - agility, speed, and first step were enough to get you around OTs and Guards really easy. DE's had all the advantage back then. However, in the current sim strength with the ability to stay on your feet, break blocks, and stun is very important to pass rushing.

I've tried pass focus, balance, and run a lot over the past 3 pre-seasons, scrimmages, and a few games. They all have their benefits in certain situations. But, saying pass focus is the sure fire best way to get sacks just doesn't match up with my players performance. Pass focus might be the overwhelming favorite way to get sacks next season when Bort changes things again and boosts FS, but if he doesn't do anything with the Oline's ability to grab a D-lineman from a mile away and hold blocks through strength only (very little blocking), then I'm still gonna use balanced and run focus mostly.

I hope that clears up my position on it. I'm not saying pass focus isn't a good way to get sacks sometimes. I just don't think it is the best way all the time like you believe. If nothing changes over next couple seasons I think you'll notice your DE start to have a much harder time gettings sacks, just like most DEs as they get higher level. It's not your build really, it's the Oline's advantage that needs changing for the most part. My suggestion is, if you're having trouble with your speed/agility DE, play with your tactics and observe how they interact with the Oline.
 
Underdawg08
offline
Link
 
Why ya gotta bring me into it? I am just minding my own bussiness
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by UnderDogs
Why ya gotta bring me into it? I am just minding my own bussiness


doh.
He said I'm like you

Ha

but you're link is also showing that the RE got off the line quicker than your guy and a RT who completely ignores your guy because he's too infatuated with the NT. I definitely see what you are talking about but to me the more time your guy spends not making a decision, the less likely he'll be able to get into position to make a play. The tackle will be able to back off and get in better position to handle you no matter which way you go. So I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. If it works for you so be it.
Edited by misled on May 28, 2009 11:51:53
 
Link
 
Originally posted by UnderDogs
Why ya gotta bring me into it? I am just minding my own bussiness


Sorry, but I see you catch a lot of shit on this forum for doing something similar to what he did. Some of the shit you get is justified, some not. My point being that the way you word your opinions is the reason for it and if he expects others to respect his opinion, he needs to show a little respect as well. Believe me UD, I'm not saying that you're wrong in what you say most of the time, but you leave very little room for an open discussion. I've never attacked you on this board because you've never done that on a thread I cared to offer my advice on. Basically, I'm only pointing out the similarity in the way he tried to give advice.

Saying stuff like: anybody who does it any other way is stupid, or whatever makes you come across as immature and thoughtless. I feel it is a very poor way to cousel players seeking advice. Just because you have experience or success doing it one way, does not make it the best way all the time. With that said, I've said my piece on this thread. It's really not worth arguing on the internet, which is one of the reasons I don't do it very often.
Edited by notgoing2argue on May 28, 2009 13:20:29
 
tdp992
offline
Link
 
What the hell, my DE only has 3 tactics to set (Ball carrying, intensity, and tackling).

Pass and run focus are no where to be seen... can someone explain this?
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tdp992
What the hell, my DE only has 3 tactics to set (Ball carrying, intensity, and tackling).

Pass and run focus are no where to be seen... can someone explain this?


that would be because you're not on the depth chart.
 
Underdawg08
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by notgoing2argue
Originally posted by UnderDogs

Why ya gotta bring me into it? I am just minding my own bussiness


Sorry, but I see you catch a lot of shit on this forum for doing something similar to what he did. Some of the shit you get is justified, some not. My point being that the way you word your opinions is the reason for it and if he expects others to respect his opinion, he needs to show a little respect as well. Believe me UD, I'm not saying that you're wrong in what you say most of the time, but you leave very little room for an open discussion. I've never attacked you on this board because you've never done that on a thread I cared to offer my advice on. Basically, I'm only pointing out the similarity in the way he tried to give advice.

Saying stuff like: anybody who does it any other way is stupid, or whatever makes you come across as immature and thoughtless. I feel it is a very poor way to cousel players seeking advice. Just because you have experience or success doing it one way, does not make it the best way all the time. With that said, I've said my piece on this thread. It's really not worth arguing on the internet, which is one of the reasons I don't do it very often.


You're right I can be a douche. It has to be for a reason though. You see guys on here making fun of something, saying it's worthless, or blah blah blah. Usually it's something I have had success with, so I want to make sure everyone knows the guy is wrong. A lot of different things work. You're completely right. Some things work the best though.

Let's take for instance Wall helping getting sacks. It does not. I will fight to the death for that, so newbs won't pump up Wall then quit after it doesn't help them get sacks.

A lot of players in these forums have taught me things, as I am sure(not to be egocentric) I have taught others. I give advice freely. I have my own way of doing things. If you take the advice and succeed, then great. At least I'm not charging 39.99$ for it. And Nothing is forcing your hand to listen to me.

Debates are debates, whether I am more passionate about what I believe is no ones fault but my own. I can not change who I am.

Plus I enjoy people in the position talk forums. You can look at the team I own. Most of the guys there are from the position talk forums who have hated me at one time or another. I don't take anything personally. And if they took anything personally we would not be as good as we are now.
Edited by UnderDogs on Jun 1, 2009 00:16:50
 
Djinnt
offline
Link
 
lol pass rush gets you more sacks, there's no real reason to debate that.
If you're better on passing plays, and on every passing play your build goal is sacking, then you're better at getting sacks.
trying to manipulate your player's speed vs any given opponent would require far too much effort and conjecture that will likely end up hurting you (in the way of sacks specifically) if you don't just put it on pass rush if you want them.

You're (notgoing2argue) focusing a lot of energy on rationalizing why you shouldn't primarily pass rush but it's useless in the debate because you're talking about the run game... that has nothing to do with how many sacks you can get.

Calling someone immature for disagreeing with you and believing what they say is a sissy tactic. Argue their point, not their dialect, or you're just being a whiner. Everyone addresses points differently, and not everyone is a care bear tree hugger with the greater good for all of mankind in mind every time they make a post. Plus stepping on toes is fun. Guess I'm "immature", oh noez.
 
Underdawg08
offline
Link
 
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=582213&pbp_id=20480065

High agility High shed blocks, and use agility to pass rush. It doesn't get much better than beating two level 52 linemen on the same play.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Daddy Warbucks
lol pass rush gets you more sacks, there's no real reason to debate that.
If you're better on passing plays, and on every passing play your build goal is sacking, then you're better at getting sacks.
trying to manipulate your player's speed vs any given opponent would require far too much effort and conjecture that will likely end up hurting you (in the way of sacks specifically) if you don't just put it on pass rush if you want them.

You're (notgoing2argue) focusing a lot of energy on rationalizing why you shouldn't primarily pass rush but it's useless in the debate because you're talking about the run game... that has nothing to do with how many sacks you can get.

Calling someone immature for disagreeing with you and believing what they say is a sissy tactic. Argue their point, not their dialect, or you're just being a whiner. Everyone addresses points differently, and not everyone is a care bear tree hugger with the greater good for all of mankind in mind every time they make a post. Plus stepping on toes is fun. Guess I'm "immature", oh noez.


Once again, reading is fundamental. I'm not talking about pass rushing in the run game. You really need to understand that your tactics affect you on every play. Reread my posts. It doesn't matter if you don't agree with what I say, watch my game versus the Florida Frenzy. They gave up 4 sacks all season long. I got 3 in one game. Well, 2 recorded and the 3rd was a safety on their QB that didn't count as a sack. How about this, in the first scrimmage this year against The Pagan Fire Eaters, I got 2 sacks on balanced focus, and we just played them again and I used pass focus, which netted 1 hurry and no tackles.

It's cool though, you can keep pass rushing on pass focus because you believe it's always the better choice. I'll keep changing up my play focus based on what I think is the guards build. Now I'm out, I'm tired of trying to explain I'm talking about pass rushing while on balanced/run focus. If you can't understand that your DT/DE doesn't just stand there watching only for run plays on run focus, that's your short-coming.
 
Djinnt
offline
Link
 
I like how you just blame shortcomings and lack of understanding on the simple fact that you don't get the argument.
We're not talking about "what will make your player the best all-around"
We're talking about "what will get you the most sacks"
fucking period. end of story.
Stop being a retard and arguing for the sake of arguing.

I'm sure everyone realizes that if you set to pass rush every game every play, some teams that almost exclusively run will walk all over you and make you regret it.
that's not what we're talking about.
Edited by Daddy Warbucks on Jun 2, 2009 13:46:56
 
Djinnt
offline
Link
 
That said, this


Originally posted by notgoing2argue
You can get sacks on any of the settings.



is still true. I'm not saying it isn't. Getting sacks is more about player build than anything else, but playing on run or balance will not give you any BOOST to getting sacks
running on pass will. that's why it's "better for getting sacks" which is the topic
 
bcjuggernauts
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by notgoing2argue
Originally posted by UnderDogs

Why ya gotta bring me into it? I am just minding my own bussiness


Sorry, but I see you catch a lot of shit on this forum for doing something similar to what he did. Some of the shit you get is justified, some not. My point being that the way you word your opinions is the reason for it and if he expects others to respect his opinion, he needs to show a little respect as well. Believe me UD, I'm not saying that you're wrong in what you say most of the time, but you leave very little room for an open discussion. I've never attacked you on this board because you've never done that on a thread I cared to offer my advice on. Basically, I'm only pointing out the similarity in the way he tried to give advice.

Saying stuff like: anybody who does it any other way is stupid, or whatever makes you come across as immature and thoughtless. I feel it is a very poor way to cousel players seeking advice. Just because you have experience or success doing it one way, does not make it the best way all the time. With that said, I've said my piece on this thread. It's really not worth arguing on the internet, which is one of the reasons I don't do it very often.


Thats cause he has a tendency to be a shadey mthr fkr dont-cha dog?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.