I can definitely see your point Mob-6, but I decided to do a few AE rolls because it's my first character and I was curious to see how it goes.
A funny thing happened though, my guy just hit level 32 so I did 3 rolls with the 6 training points I had, and coincidentally a piece that has 5% fake chance came up. I'm trying to resist the temptation to equip both pieces and do a stupid double fake chance build, but I made a quick spreadsheet anyway a copy/pasted the results here, it shows what the fake chance for each piece would be at each level:
Level Cost per piece Total Cost Effect +3% +5% Total Fake Chance
1 $500 $2,000 1 3 5 8
8 $2,500 $10,000 2 6 10 16
16 $12,500 $50,000 3 9 15 24
24 $50,000 $200,000 4 12 20 32
32 $200,000 $800,000 5 15 25 40
40 $400,000 $1,600,000 6 18 30 48
48 $600,000 $2,400,000 7 21 35 56
56 $800,000 $3,200,000 8 24 40 64
So I could put +40% fake chance on him right now if I wanted, and it would be +64% by level 56. I doubt it would even be good, but maybe I'll do it as a science experiment since I had the weird luck to roll those pieces.
This table is totally wrong, ignore it.
A funny thing happened though, my guy just hit level 32 so I did 3 rolls with the 6 training points I had, and coincidentally a piece that has 5% fake chance came up. I'm trying to resist the temptation to equip both pieces and do a stupid double fake chance build, but I made a quick spreadsheet anyway a copy/pasted the results here, it shows what the fake chance for each piece would be at each level:
Level Cost per piece Total Cost Effect +3% +5% Total Fake Chance
1 $500 $2,000 1 3 5 8
8 $2,500 $10,000 2 6 10 16
16 $12,500 $50,000 3 9 15 24
24 $50,000 $200,000 4 12 20 32
32 $200,000 $800,000 5 15 25 40
40 $400,000 $1,600,000 6 18 30 48
48 $600,000 $2,400,000 7 21 35 56
56 $800,000 $3,200,000 8 24 40 64
So I could put +40% fake chance on him right now if I wanted, and it would be +64% by level 56. I doubt it would even be good, but maybe I'll do it as a science experiment since I had the weird luck to roll those pieces.
This table is totally wrong, ignore it.
Edited by Fumblerooski on May 25, 2009 12:44:39
Edited by Fumblerooski on May 22, 2009 12:14:10






























