Warriors Represent!
threesportphenom
offline
offline
Hopefully we will see the Clamjousters in the top 15 after tonights huge win!
JeffJa5
offline
offline
Not to be a dick or anything but how much thought goes into these rankings? Scranton beat Riverside and KC yet both are still ranked higher? Granted we just beat KC today so that makes sense. Do people actually look at this or is it just based off of record. Don't get me wrong I love the thread and its fun to read, just wondering how these rankings are made?
The Plauwlauw
offline
offline
(4)5. New York Doom 10-1-1 - Winning 4 games in a row and almost shutting down the Beer Barons from scoring (the team that has been known to score, even against the Gangsters and ATCT); the Doom may possibly now have the BEST defense in the league, yes even better than the Gangsters.
WE would like to say we think the Tide's defense is pretty stout as well
WE would like to say we think the Tide's defense is pretty stout as well
The Plauwlauw
offline
offline
Originally posted by bigpimpin123
crap we lost
you did score the first touchdown on us since the 3rd game of the season
crap we lost
you did score the first touchdown on us since the 3rd game of the season
bigpimpin123
offline
offline
yeah who was it that said wed be lucky to score 7 or something? well we did so suck it lol jk. those 2 plays cost us, one was my player's fault which im not so happy with, especially since it was his 1st missed tackle on the season
The Plauwlauw
offline
offline
Well don't blame yourself. It was Major Speed ,who will probably be the league MVP. He has done that to many others.
Good game Doom.
Good game Doom.
MagiK
offline
offline
Originally posted by JeffJa5
Not to be a dick or anything but how much thought goes into these rankings? Scranton beat Riverside and KC yet both are still ranked higher? Granted we just beat KC today so that makes sense. Do people actually look at this or is it just based off of record. Don't get me wrong I love the thread and its fun to read, just wondering how these rankings are made?
There's a committee that has members of owners/gms/and players of BBB9. They send in their rankings (whether they go by rank, opinion, stats, etc.). I take those rankings and determine who's the top dog and the worst.
If you want to know how I determine their rankings, I give 1st place 32 points and so on. The team with the most points will be number 1.
If you disagree with the rankings, you can always join the committee and voice your own rankings to possibly tinker the final rankings.
Not to be a dick or anything but how much thought goes into these rankings? Scranton beat Riverside and KC yet both are still ranked higher? Granted we just beat KC today so that makes sense. Do people actually look at this or is it just based off of record. Don't get me wrong I love the thread and its fun to read, just wondering how these rankings are made?
There's a committee that has members of owners/gms/and players of BBB9. They send in their rankings (whether they go by rank, opinion, stats, etc.). I take those rankings and determine who's the top dog and the worst.
If you want to know how I determine their rankings, I give 1st place 32 points and so on. The team with the most points will be number 1.
If you disagree with the rankings, you can always join the committee and voice your own rankings to possibly tinker the final rankings.
Psycho79
offline
offline
Originally posted by JeffJa5
Not to be a dick or anything but how much thought goes into these rankings? Scranton beat Riverside and KC yet both are still ranked higher? Granted we just beat KC today so that makes sense. Do people actually look at this or is it just based off of record. Don't get me wrong I love the thread and its fun to read, just wondering how these rankings are made?
Scranton didn't beat KC until after the voting for these rankings and at the time they had a better record than Scranton, voting was on the 18th-19th, you beat them on the 20th. And when the voting went on Riverside was 6-6 Scranton was 5-7, so the main thing there was probably because they had a better record.
Not to be a dick or anything but how much thought goes into these rankings? Scranton beat Riverside and KC yet both are still ranked higher? Granted we just beat KC today so that makes sense. Do people actually look at this or is it just based off of record. Don't get me wrong I love the thread and its fun to read, just wondering how these rankings are made?
Scranton didn't beat KC until after the voting for these rankings and at the time they had a better record than Scranton, voting was on the 18th-19th, you beat them on the 20th. And when the voting went on Riverside was 6-6 Scranton was 5-7, so the main thing there was probably because they had a better record.
Last edited May 21, 2008 12:01:15
edwardwscollins
offline
offline
I think the rankings are biased toward the Eastern Conference. In all actuality when it comes time for the interleague playing I dont see the easternn conference winning more than 3 games
The Championship will be coming to a western conference team. I dont know which one but it will be one.
The Championship will be coming to a western conference team. I dont know which one but it will be one.
Last edited May 21, 2008 13:45:03
Jakemall
offline
offline
Originally posted by edwardwscollins
I think the rankings are biased toward the Eastern Conference. In all actuality when it comes time for the interleague playing I dont see the easternn conference winning more than 3 games
The Championship will be coming to a western conference team. I dont know which one but it will be one.
I appreciate the vote of confidence but if either the Warriors or the Stars progress to the championship, I would not care to wager my own money on that game against Bama or Indy...and if any other team from the west progresses I would put my own money against the west winning.
I think the rankings are biased toward the Eastern Conference. In all actuality when it comes time for the interleague playing I dont see the easternn conference winning more than 3 games
The Championship will be coming to a western conference team. I dont know which one but it will be one.
I appreciate the vote of confidence but if either the Warriors or the Stars progress to the championship, I would not care to wager my own money on that game against Bama or Indy...and if any other team from the west progresses I would put my own money against the west winning.
Last edited May 21, 2008 14:37:47
Papa_Bear
offline
offline
If we had to go on current Team Chemistry and Overall level average right now.... I would pit the Hawaii Warriors against anyone in the BBB and have at worst a 50/50 shot at winning.... east or west. But then again I'm Biased 
edwardwscollins
offline
offline
Your last tough game this regular season is tomorrow against us there Papa Bear good luck of course I will be rooting for my team.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
