Warrior General Games

Yeah I agree, Stone did put up some numbers... He has my vote.

Stone, without a doubt.

This was most impressive to me:

K Tommy "Sure thing" Foot, 5/5 FGs (4 of those were in the 40-49 range)-Port City Mosquitoes

This might not work so good with CPU teams padding players stats... Yes RB William Stone had a remarkable game but it was against a gutted/CPU team whereas HB Drew Romine played against a decent team and ran up some decent numbers over 31 plays.
So I'll vote for..... K Tommy "Sure thing" Foot, 5/5 FGs (4 of those were in the 40-49 range)-Port City Mosquitoes

Originally posted by Mattyk41
This might not work so good with CPU teams padding players stats... Yes RB William Stone had a remarkable game but it was against a gutted/CPU team whereas HB Drew Romine played against a decent team and ran up some decent numbers over 31 plays.
So I'll vote for..... K Tommy "Sure thing" Foot, 5/5 FGs (4 of those were in the 40-49 range)-Port City Mosquitoes


I gotta agree when we vote we have to take those games with a grain of salt. Of course there will be some big numbers, but there probaly is a player much more deserving

If that's the case with him running on a CPU team, I am going with Eye Shield 21 who put up big numbers running against players that were higher lvl... But I don't want to start a pissing match...

Originally posted by kentae
Originally posted by Mattyk41

This might not work so good with CPU teams padding players stats... Yes RB William Stone had a remarkable game but it was against a gutted/CPU team whereas HB Drew Romine played against a decent team and ran up some decent numbers over 31 plays.
So I'll vote for..... K Tommy "Sure thing" Foot, 5/5 FGs (4 of those were in the 40-49 range)-Port City Mosquitoes


I gotta agree when we vote we have to take those games with a grain of salt. Of course there will be some big numbers, but there probaly is a player much more deserving


It's just the preseason and it will give us a chance to work things out on how we want to do this. Also voter should take in consideration of the team a player played against. I can honesty say I didn't this time around but I will next game and there after. I know our RB Drew Romine had a good game against a evenally matched team with high lvl players. So let just come up with some ground rules for situations like this. It can work, it's just depends on us.

Tommy Foot.

Originally posted by drezplace
Originally posted by kentae

Originally posted by Mattyk41


This might not work so good with CPU teams padding players stats... Yes RB William Stone had a remarkable game but it was against a gutted/CPU team whereas HB Drew Romine played against a decent team and ran up some decent numbers over 31 plays.
So I'll vote for..... K Tommy "Sure thing" Foot, 5/5 FGs (4 of those were in the 40-49 range)-Port City Mosquitoes


I gotta agree when we vote we have to take those games with a grain of salt. Of course there will be some big numbers, but there probaly is a player much more deserving


It's just the preseason and it will give us a chance to work things out on how we want to do this. Also voter should take in consideration of the team a player played against. I can honesty say I didn't this time around but I will next game and there after. I know our RB Drew Romine had a good game against a evenally matched team with high lvl players. So let just come up with some ground rules for situations like this. It can work, it's just depends on us.

.....so who are u voting for?

Originally posted by Mattyk41
This might not work so good with CPU teams padding players stats... Yes RB William Stone had a remarkable game but it was against a gutted/CPU team whereas HB Drew Romine played against a decent team and ran up some decent numbers over 31 plays.
So I'll vote for..... K Tommy "Sure thing" Foot, 5/5 FGs (4 of those were in the 40-49 range)-Port City Mosquitoes

Yeh I know it was against a pretty weak team but if you look at my team too I have a few low levels and CPUs in there also, so hopefully you take that into consideration.

Originally posted by chi-bob
Yeh I know it was against a pretty weak team but if you look at my team too I have a few low levels and CPUs in there also, so hopefully you take that into consideration.
Except the D you ran against was pure CPU besides one player. Cant believe people care enough about these awards, especially preseason, when their player may not get voted for...

I am now going into the fetal position because I didnt get enough votes. Boohoo.

Originally posted by patsfootball91
Originally posted by drezplace

Originally posted by kentae


Originally posted by Mattyk41



This might not work so good with CPU teams padding players stats... Yes RB William Stone had a remarkable game but it was against a gutted/CPU team whereas HB Drew Romine played against a decent team and ran up some decent numbers over 31 plays.
So I'll vote for..... K Tommy "Sure thing" Foot, 5/5 FGs (4 of those were in the 40-49 range)-Port City Mosquitoes


I gotta agree when we vote we have to take those games with a grain of salt. Of course there will be some big numbers, but there probaly is a player much more deserving


It's just the preseason and it will give us a chance to work things out on how we want to do this. Also voter should take in consideration of the team a player played against. I can honesty say I didn't this time around but I will next game and there after. I know our RB Drew Romine had a good game against a evenally matched team with high lvl players. So let just come up with some ground rules for situations like this. It can work, it's just depends on us.

.....so who are u voting for?

I have already voted earlier.

Also, not everyone is going to no matter what is decided on as far as how we do this. There always going to be that one person who's going to be unhappy with something. So know there will be one or two who's going to be unset not matter what.

Its a tie between 2 people. We need someone to break it!

or we can just have 2 winners. that happens sometimes too.

Stone!!!

-WJ

Originally posted by Shocken
Originally posted by chi-bob

Yeh I know it was against a pretty weak team but if you look at my team too I have a few low levels and CPUs in there also, so hopefully you take that into consideration.
Except the D you ran against was pure CPU besides one player. Cant believe people care enough about these awards, especially preseason, when their player may not get voted for...

I am now going into the fetal position because I didnt get enough votes. Boohoo.

It's just for fun. If you don't like it don't participate, no need to trash it.

All things considered I vote for "Eye Shield", he put up great numbers at level 34 against a good run defense.