Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Modok

Yeah, because SW's depth really helped them this season.

What are you trying to say? That comparing apples to oranges has any relevance to my point about some oranges?

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by Modok


Yeah, because SW's depth really helped them this season.

What are you trying to say? That comparing apples to oranges has any relevance to my point about some oranges?

Reminds me of this analogy I heard one time about beating 3rd graders in basketball or something

Exactly.

I don't know what he is trying to chime in with, but SW played in a different conference and used a different run/pass ration and played different team with many different dynamics involved, and they still did well and won 10 games, but this isn't about SW, it's about LVG compared to OFG and there aren't outside factors of SW that have a direct implication of relevance to my point about LVGs massive depth advantage in this one single game.

Originally posted by thehazyone
Big Shirley (who I think is better than Csonka, yea, I said it)

I LOL'ed

TSE, the point is that you seem to think depth makes a difference in the scheme of things. While it may have a small impact, it isnt as powerful as you seem to let on.

once S8 is over, I hope everyone in the East can just squash everything, and no one bears any hard feelings due to "cheese". everyone can have a group hug, sing kumbayah, and then focus on directing their barbs at TSE, as intended.

Originally posted by Maik Jeaunz
once S8 is over, I hope everyone in the East can just squash everything, and no one bears any hard feelings due to "cheese". everyone can have a group hug, sing kumbayah, and then focus on directing their barbs at TSE, as intended.

I agree

I wish these boards had an ignore function.

Originally posted by s.i.m.
I wish these boards had an ignore function.

http://glbscripts.myfreeforum.org/Forum_Ignore_List_about122.html

Don't know if this still works, but you could try that.

Originally posted by s.i.m.
I wish these boards had an ignore function.

I would ignore myself

It's damn nice to have you back, magic...Been seeing your posts popping up all over the place today, and a couple of them damn near made me spit soda.

Originally posted by PP
It's damn nice to have you back, magic...Been seeing your posts popping up all over the place today, and a couple of them damn near made me spit soda.

Thank god you didn't say spit beer....I would have had to rethink my opinion of you

Originally posted by s.i.m.
I wish these boards had an ignore function.

Greasemonkey

Originally posted by Modok
TSE, the point is that you seem to think depth makes a difference in the scheme of things. While it may have a small impact, it isnt as powerful as you seem to let on.

You don't think having most of your offense and defense not have to play STs makes a difference? I don't want to turn this thread into a debate about that, but higher energy = better performance for about 10 calculations per player per play. If you don't think that matters tremendously you should probably reconsider. I actually added several STers many seasons ago (unfortunately for me, non-booster types) specifically to save our offense and defense some energy. However, I think the most players we have ever had was 53. One of the main goals we have this season is to increase the size of our roster because Bort won't limit roster sizes and we have no choice because our STs got mauled this season, particularly against bloated teams.

If you don't think roster sizes should be limited, that is fine. But you are just plain wrong if you don't think it provides a significant advantage to have 10+ more players than the team you are playing.

All that said, I'm picking Vegas to win by less than a TD with a STs TD being the difference.